cognition and development Flashcards

1
Q

what are the key points of piagets theory of cog development

A
  • argues that cog develops due to active discovery
  • child as scientist
  • schema is developed and development takes place in stages
  • do not know less than adults but simply think in an entirely different way
  • argues that discovery learning will occur when child is ready/ matured
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the schema and how does it work in piagets theory

A
  • mental framework of beliefs and expectations that influence cognitive processing , developed from experience
  • piaget says children are born with small number of schema to allow them to interact with the world
  • cog development involves construction of progressively more detailed schema for people, objects and physical actions as well as feelings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is equilibration and what part does it play in piagets theory

A
  • motivation to learn
    -the process of cog balancing when encountering new information
  • once assimilation or accomodation has taken place when dealing with new info
  • done to escape disequilibrium when adapting to a new situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what two processes are how learning occurs in piagets theory of cog development and how do they work

A

ASSIMILATION - process of fitting new experiences into existing schemas without making any change to it
- eg a child with a dog can adapt to the existence of other breeds of dig by assimilating into the dog schema

ACCOMODATION- takes place in response to dramatically new experiences
- process of radically changing current schema or forming new one
- due to new conflicting info creates disequilibrium
- eg child may at first think dogs and cats are same due to 4 legs and a tail - but then recognise new category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is a strength of piagets theory of cog development

A

REAL WORLD APP
- has been applied in teaching
- piagets idea of children actively learning by exploring environment has changed classroom teaching
- since his ideas became popular in 1960s classroom teaching has changed
- from children sat silently in rows copying from board to actively orientated classrooms where kids engage in tasks
- construct own understandings
- eg looking at physical differences between water and sand
- shows how piaget has inspired approaches that may facilitate development of individual mental representations of the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are two weaknesses of piagets theory of cog development

A

UNDERESTIMATES ROLE OF OTHERS
-piaget saw others as useful as sources of info
- saw learning itself as an individual process
- contrasts other theories in which learning is seen as a more social process, supported by knowledgeable people like vygotskys theory
-strong evidence to support idea that learning is enhanced by others and interaction
- fails to consider alternative explanations
- alternative theories may explain better or should at least be considered
- piagets theory may be incomplete explanation as there is little emphasis on others

NOT SCIENTIFIC
- although his work has been used within education so therefore has wider application and external validity
- methods and research is not scientific
- sample that he used was from a nursery at the university
- these children were all of similar social class and intelligence
- not generalisable to others- social class, culture/ ethnicity, intelligence
- found that there may be more individual differences that can occur due to different cog abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the key point of piagets stages of intellectual development

A

children develop skills when they are mentally ready to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the 4 stages of piagets stages and what are the ages for each

A
  • sensorimotor stage (0-2years)
  • pre operational stage (2-7years)
    -stage of concrete operations (7-11)
  • stage of formal operations (11+)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the key terms, description, and any studies for the sensorimotor stage

A
  • object permanence- ability to realise that an object still exists when it passes out of visual field (0-8 months can not understand)
  • babys early focus is on physical sensations
  • knowledge consist of basic motor movement
  • 8 months- begins to understand object permanence
  • in order to have this, child needs to hold simple mental representations of objects
  • piaget took toy from child and put under blanket
  • if child searched for it suggested object permanence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the key terms, description, and any studies for the pre operational stage

A
  • CONSERVATION- ability to distinguish between reality and appearance
    -EGOCENTRISM- seeing things from own view and being unaware of other peoples perspectives
  • CLASS INCLUSION- advanced classifacation skill learning that classifacations have subsets
  • child is mobile and can use language at age of 2
  • find it difficult to look from another POV
  • can not see some classifacations
  • 2 containers with liquid of same amount but dfferent shapes - kids before this stage would not recognise same amount
  • three mountain task - doll placed other side and child asked what doll would see
  • class inclusion- are there more dogs or animals - would say more dogs- do not recognise they are included in animals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the key terms, description, and any studies for the stage of concrete operations

A
  • operations - ability to accurately imagine the consequences of something happening witthout it actually happening
  • most children can conserve and perform better on egocentric tasks and class inclusion
  • only concrete operations - can only be applied to physical objects in childs prescence
  • still struggle with absract ideas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the key terms, description, and any studies for the stage of formal operations

A
  • operations - ability to now imagine consequences of even abstract ideas
  • capable of formal reasoning
  • can focus on formal reasoning
  • pendulum tasks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the three weaknesses if piagets stages of intellectual development

A

ISSUES WITH CONSERVATION RESEARCH
- research into this was flawed
- Children were influenced by seeing the experimental change the counters
- They believed they were meant to agree that the quantity had changed
- Another test was set up where naughty Teddy knocked the counters instead and it was found that 62% of six-year-olds answered successfully
- this shows they could conserve and shows that the first study did not measure what it intended to measure
- Internal validity also shows was wrong about age at which conservation happens

LACK OF SUPPORT FOR EGOCENTRISM
-Hughes tested ability of children to see a situation from two viewpoints by using a model with walls two police dolls and another doll
- Children were asked to move the doll somewhere where one police officer could not see
- Found that as young as 3 1/2 years old were able to position the in the right place
-means that when tested with a scenario that makes more sense children could imagine other perspective much earlier than Piaget expected
- piaget underestimated abilities of younger children and the stages are incorrect

CULTURAL BIAS
- Piaget was a middle-class European who used children from European families
Developed his theory off of child families who valued academic abilities and a group that were from very similar backgrounds
Limits ability to generalise
Many tasks used required being familiar with certain western problems solving skills
Research has shown cognitive development is influenced by cultural factors such as schooling language social interactions which are different in different cultures
His research is an imposed etic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the main theme of
vygotskyx theory of cognitive development

A

cog development is a social process of learning from more experienced others
it includes ZPD and scaffolding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did vygotsky say about cultural differences in cognitive abilities

A
  • reasoning abilities are required from the more knowledgeable others
    Means that there may be cultural differences in cognitive development
    Children will pick up mental tools that will be most important for life with physical social and work environment in their culture
    For example and eye coordination to hunt with a bow
    Unlike Piaget who doesn’t take into account
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the zone of proximal development

A

The gap between between what a child can do on their own and what they can achieve with guidance from expert

Believed that children learn learn more facts via social interaction and acquire more advanced reasoning ability
Believed higher mental functions could only be acquired through interaction with more knowledgeable others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is scaffolding

A

The process of helping a learner cross zone of proximal development and advance as much as they can on the stage of development they are at level of help declines as the learner crosses the CPD
Five stages recruitment breaking task into manageable steps encouragement motivation demonstration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what are MKO’s

A

More knowledgeable others
Child learns through problem-solving experiences with someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the two strengths of Vygoskys theory of cognitive development

A

REAL WORLD APP
has practical application in education
Idea that children learn faster with scaffolding has raised expectations of what they can achieve
Social interaction is encouraged through tutoring an individual assistance from teachers used to scaffold children through ZPD
Evidence to suggest these are effective review of teaching assistance found that they were very effective and improving the rate of learning

EMPHASIS ON SOCIAL AND CULTURAL DIFFERENCES
theory unlike piagets highlights the social and cultural differences in cognitive development
Has more cultural relativism accounting for differences in development based on cultural norms values and tools
This makes it more universally applicable

20
Q

what is the weakness
of vygotskys theory of cognitive development

A

LITTLE RESEARCH SUPPORT
lacks measurable concepts making it difficult to test an operationalise
whilst concepts like scaffolding are useful
Did not clearly define how to measure these e.g. how much scaffolding is optimal for learning
Makes it more difficult to apply consistently in both research and education
Unlike piaget who proposed distinct developmental stages
Makes it harder to test and compare age groups

21
Q

what are they key aspects of baillargeons theory

A

-disputes piagets theory that babies less than 8-9 months have no understanding of the physical world
-VOE developed to investgate infant understanding of the world arguing that it is innate
- if children understand the physical world , they will expect certain events to happen in a situation
- if they do not occur, child will react

22
Q

what is the procedure and findings of the violation of expectation research

A

procedure
- showed 24 babies 5-6 months old a tall and short rabbit passing behind a screen with a window
- familiarisation even- both passed behind the wall disappearing
- expected event- small rabbit does not appear in window due to height
- unexpected event- large rabbit does not appear in window
- a baby with object permanance should show surprise

findings
- babies looked longer at unexpected event
- interpreted as being more surprised at this
- demonstrated that children younger than 8 months - some as young as 3 months- demonstrated object permenance

23
Q

what was baillrgeons alternative explanation for piagets theory of a lack of understanding of the physical world in younger children

A
  • that it was due to something different for example failure to look for a hidden product due to lack of motor skills or getting easily distracted
24
Q

what is the theory of physical reasoning system

A
  • proposed children are born with PRS
  • have primitive awareness of world becoming more sophisticated from experience
  • impossible event captured attention as PRS redies them to take notice of events that may develop their understanding
25
what are the two strengths of Baillargeons explanation
SCIENTIFIC METHODOLGY - controlled - more internal val - higher pop validity than other research as used birth announcements in the local paper - infants sat on parents lap to try normalise situation - parents closed eyes and did not interact to reduce evs - two observers, noting amount of interest -double blind technique used so didnt know if observing expected or unexpected - gives more scientific credibility UNIVERSAL UNDERSTANDING - ability to explain universal understandings of the physical world - we all have understanding of basic characteristics of physical world regardless of culture and personal experience - everyone understands that if we drop something it will fall to the ground - does nto require past experiences or culture - suggests basic understanding is innate - suggests PRS is correct
26
what is the weakness of baillargeons explanation
ISSUES WITH CAUSATION - although in controlled env - infant may show surprise and interest but does not neccessarily mean they understand principle of object permanance - infant may simply find the event more fascinating than the other rather than understanding - studies show variability in looking time may not always reflect knowledge - decr internal val asks question of whether it is measuring what it intended to
27
what is perspective taking
ability to be able to view a situation or emotions from another persons perspective
28
what did perspective taking research look at, what was the procedure and what where the findings
- looked at changes that occured with age in responses to scenarios - 30 boys and girls ( 20 4year olds , 20 5year olds, 20 6year olds ) given task then asked how each person felt in scenarios - one- holly who promised her father she wouldnt climb any more trees but sees her friend whos cat is stuck in a tree - a number of distinct levels of perspective taking were identified - selman found levels of perspective taking correlated with age suggesting clear developmental sequence
29
what were selmans stages of development
STAGE 0- egocentric - cannot reliably distinguish between own emotions and those of others - can identify emotional states but not what behaviour caused them STAGE 1- social informational -child can now tell the difference between own POV and that of others -can usually focus on only one of these STAGE 2- self reflectve - child can put themselves in the position of other person and fully appreciate other perspective - can only take on board one at a time STAGE 3- mutual - children now ables to look at a situation from their own and another point of view at a time STAGE 4- social and conventional system - become able to see that sometimes understanding others POV is not enough to allow people to reach agreement
30
what were the later developments of selmans theory of perspective taking
- regonised that the above did not fully explain social development - interpersonal understanding, interpersonal negotiation strategies and awareness of personal meaning of relationships
31
what is the strength of selmans theory of perspective taking
REAL LIFE APPLICATION - theory has been applied in educational and social settings to try and improve social skills - range of programs and lessons that teach children to consider other peoples perspective - these have been effective in reducing conflicts and bullying within schools - can also be used in prisons and young offender institutions to try and improve perspective taking and looking at crime from victims POV - may stop reoffending - has practical application however may depend on individual difference
32
what are the two weaknesses of Selmans thoery of perspective taking
REDUCTIONIST - too cognitive based - there are far more to childs social development than just increasing cog abilities - selmans approach fails to take into account any other factors that may impact a childs social development - other internal factors include empathy and emotional self regulation - approach is too narrow CULTURAL AND SOCIAL INFLUENCES - may be a mix of nature and nurture - assumes that perspective taking develops in a natural sequence that is the same for everyone - evidence for cultural differences in perspective taking - compared american and chinese children and founds chinese children significantly more advances - impact of family, peers and upbringings should be considered
33
what is the theory of mind
an individual understands that other people have separate minds/ mental states and that others see the world from a different point of view
34
what are false beliefs
the understanding that others may hold and act on mistaken belifs
35
what did Meltzoff do to look into theory of mind in toddlers
- research showed that toddlers at 18 months have an understanding of adult intentions - observed adults place beads successfully and unsuccessfully into a jar - both conditions toddler successfully placed beads in a jar - they were imitating what the adult intended to do rather than what they actually did - do have a simple theory of mind
36
what was a false believe task by Wimmer and perner
- test whether children can understand that people can believe something that's not true - 3-4 year olds told a story where maxi left chocolate in blue cupboard and went to play - mother used it and put it in the green cupboard - children asked where maxi would look - at 4, could correctly identify the blue cupboard
37
what is the relationship between Theory of mind and autism and what is the research that supports this ( what was the procedure and the results)
- autism- lifelong developmental disability affects how people communicate and interact with the world - may have challenges with empathy, social communication - may have troubles with TOM SALLY ANNE STUDY - 3 groups of ppts: 20 autistic children, 14 children with down syndrome, 27 children without any disability - sally places marble in basket and when not looking, Anne moves it to her box. - task is to work out where sally will look / have a false belief of where it is - 85% of children in control correctly identified - 20% of autistic children were able to answer
38
what are the two weaknesses of the theory of mind
EFFECTS OF SOCIAL AND CULTURAL FACTORS - states that TOM development forms general pattern for all - strong argument for nature - research has found that children in collectivist cultures where there is emphasis on importance of socialising and working together may develop TOM differently to individualistic cultures where independence is encouraged - may also be effected by other environmental factors like having siblings which could accelerate TOM, learning from a younger age how others point of views HARD TO DISTINGUISH - hard to distinguish between TOM and perspective taking - they are related but still different cognitive abilities - can be very difficult to be sure we are measuring one and not the other - for example in the sally Anne study child may be switching perspective between sally and Anne rather than just trying to understand their point of view - this means that task designed to test for one may be measuring the other
38
what is the strength of the theory of mind
REAL WORLD APPLICATION - one strength is the application to understanding of autism - tasks used to assess TOM prove difficult for some autistic people due to not fully understanding what others are thinking - this offers an explanation for why some autistic people may find social interaction hard - however does not provide complete explanation as not every autistic person experiences TOM issues and does not explain the cog strengths of autistic people means must be other factors involved
39
what are mirror neurons
Special brain cells in several areas of the brain they fire in response to personal action in response to action of others
40
How were mirror neurons discovered?
-Came across by accident -Rizzolatti studying activity in monkeys motor cortex -one researcher reached for lunch In view of monkey. -Monkeys motor cortex became activated -This was due to mirror neurons.
41
what do mirror neurons say about intention
Whole new way of thinking -suggested mirror neurons respond to not just actions but intentions behind behaviour -we simulate, others, actions and experience the intentions
42
which other parts of cognition and development do mirror neurons provide a neural mechanism for
- perspective taking - experiencing and understanding others perspective and experiencing empathy - mechanism for developing TOM
43
how does evolution link to mirror neurons
unique and complex social interactions require a brain that facilitates understanding of intention, emotion and perspective mirror neurons have shaped with evolution
44
how do mirror neurons explain autism
- links autism to dysfunctional MN system - prevent child from imitating and understanding social behaviour of others
45
what are two weaknesses of mirror neurons
DIFFICULT TO RESEARCH - animal studies of Mirror neurons often involve implanting electrodes in the brain in order to study Electrical activity -helps pinpoint activity in individual neurons helping establish causation - However, it is ethically impossible to use this kind of procedure in humans -such animal studies tell us a little about human cognition -much more complex than animals -The alternative technique is only measure brain activity in areas not individual cells -so no direct evidence. MAY BE CHANGED WITH EXPERIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT -there are studies that suggest they may not be as fixed as suggested and may be shaped by experience and learning -due to plasticity - For example, someone who dances may show stronger mirror neuron activity When watching movement linked with dance -suggests the system may be able to develop with practice and challenges idea that they are innate and non-adaptable
46
what isa the strength of mirror neurons
RESEARCH SUPPORT - for example one study scanned brains of people as they watched a film of people yawning - levels of activity in an area belived to be rich in mirror neurons in the brain increased and ppts yawned in response - contagious yawning is widely believed to be the result of mirror neuron activity to empathy