Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

contracts & sales > formation of contracts > Flashcards

formation of contracts Flashcards

1
Q

what is required for a contract to be binding?

A
  • manifestation of mutual assent
  • consideration
  • lack of valid defenses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define offer

A

objective manifestation of a willingness by offeror to enter into agreement that creates power of acceptance in offeree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

intent - a statement is an offer only if:

A
  • person to whom it is communicated could reasonably interpret it as an offer
  • expresses present intent of a person to be legally bound by a K
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the knowledge requirement for an offer?

A

offeree must know of the offer in order to have the power to accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the general requirement for the terms of an offer?

A

terms must be definite or the contract fails for indefiniteness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the required terms for offer under common law?

A
  • essential terms (parties, subject matter, price, quantity) must be covered in K
  • if the parties intended to create a K, the court may supply missing terms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the required terms for an offer under the UCC?

A
  • only essential term is quantity
  • UCC “fills the gap” if other terms are missing
  • EXCEPTION: requirements or output Ks (UCC implies “good faith”)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what language is required for a valid offer?

A

offer must contain words of promise, undertaking, or commitment, and be targeted to a number of people who could actually accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what kind of contract is it if a return promise is requested?

A

bilateral contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what kind of contract is it if an act is requested?

A

unilateral contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

advertisements as an invitation to deal

A

advertisements are only an invitation to receive offers (but may qualify as an offer if sufficiently specific and limits who can accept or if associated with a stated aware)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

termination of offers - lapse of time

A

offer terminates on a specified termination date or a reasonable period of time if none stated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

termination of offers - death/mental incapacity general rule

A

offer terminates, even if offeree does not learn of the offeror’s death until after the oferee has sent what he believes is an acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

termination of offers - death/mental incapacity EXCEPTION

A

offers for option Ks do not terminate because consideration was paid to keep the offer open

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

termination of offers - destruction/illegality

A

destruction of offer or illegality of offer terminates the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

termination of offers - revocation

A

offer can be revoked any time prior to acceptance (even if it states it will be open for specific amount of time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

when is the revocation of an offer effective?

A

not effective until communicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

when is a revocation sent by mail effective?

A

revocation sent by mail is not effective until received

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the four limitations on revocation?

A

(1) option K
(2) UCC firm offer rule
(3) promissory estoppel
(4) partial performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

limitations on revocation - option K

A

an offeree must generally give consideration for an option K to be enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

limitations on revocation - UCC firm offer rule

A

offer irrevocable (for reasonable time but no more than three months) if offeror is a merchant (or any business person), and assurances (in authenticated writing) are made that offer will remain open

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

is consideration needed to keep offer open under the UCC firm offer rule?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

limitations on revocation - promissory estoppel

A

if offeree reasonably and detrimentally relies on offer it may become irrevocable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

limitations on revocation - partial performance generally

A

for all Ks, offeree must have knowledge of offer when performance begins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

limitations on revocation - partial performance unilateral K

A

offeror cannot revoke once offeree has begun performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

limitations on revocation - partial performance bilateral K

A

commencement of performance operates as promise to render complete performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

revocations of general offers (to large number of people)

A

revocable only by notice given at least same level of publicity as offer (effective even if potential offeree acts in reliance on offer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

rejection by offeree

A
  • offeree clearly conveys to offeror that he no longer intends to accept the offer
  • rejection usually effective upon receipt
  • counteroffer - acts as rejection of original offer and creates new offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

what is an acceptance?

A

an objective manifestation by the offeree to be bound by the terms of the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

how is a bilateral K accepted?

A

an exchange of promises that render enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

how is a unilateral K accepted?

A
  • promise to do something by one party in return for an act of the other party
  • starting to perform is not enough, but it will make offer irrevocable for a reasonable period of time to complete performance
  • offeree must be aware of offer before acting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

means of acceptance - general rule

A

unless offeror specifies, offeree can accept in any reasonable manner/means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

means of acceptance - silence

A

silence is not acceptance unless offeree has reason to believe offer could be accepted by silence or previous dealings make it reasonable to believe that offeree must notify offeror if he does not intent to accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

means of acceptance - shipment of goods

A

buyer’s request that goods be shipped is inviting acceptance either by seller’s promise to ship or by prompt shipment of goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

means of acceptance - shipment of goods: nonconforming goods shipped

A

both an acceptance and a breach, unless seller seasonably notifies buyer that goods are an accommodation (counteroffer); buyer may then accept or reject the nonconforming goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

mailbox rule - generally

A

applies only to acceptance; almost exclusively applies to bilateral K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

mailbox rule - acceptance

A

effective when sent (not upon receipt), unless offer provides otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

mailbox rule - rejection following acceptance

A

acceptance will control even if offeror receives
rejection first (but if offeror detrimentally relies on rejection then offeree estopped
from enforcing K)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

mailbox rule - acceptance following reject

A

mailbox rule does not apply; first one received
(i.e., in possession of offeror or her agent, or deposited in mailbox) will prevail; offeror
need not actually read the received communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

mailbox rule - revocation

A

effective upon receipt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

mailbox rule - options and other irrevocable offers

A

mailbox rule does not apply; acceptance
must be received by offeror by a certain date or before offer expires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

notice - unilateral K

A

Offeree not required to give notice after completing performance, unless:
- Offeror wouldn’t learn of performance with reasonable certainty and promptness; or
- Offer requires notice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

notice - unilateral K: notice required but not provided—offeror’s duty is discharged, unless:

A
  • Offeree exercises reasonable diligence to give notice;
  • Offeror learns of performance within reasonable time; or
  • Offer indicates notice of acceptance is not required.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

notice - bilateral K

A

offeree must give notice of acceptance

  • Mailbox rule—acceptance valid when sent (even though offeror hasn’t received it)
  • UCC—if acceptance is made by beginning performance, notice is required within a
    reasonable time; failure to give notice results in offer’s lapse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

additional or different terms - common law mirror-image rule

A

acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer, so any change or addition to the terms acts as a rejection and a new counteroffer; conditional acceptance terminates the offer and acts as new offer from original offeree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

additional or different terms - UCC (no mirror-image rule) in general

A

acceptance containing additional or different terms generally treated as acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

additional or different terms - UCC (no mirror-image rule): one or both parties are NOT merchants

A

definite and seasonable expression of
acceptance sent within a reasonable time is usually acceptance of original offer, and
new/different terms are treated as proposed additions to the K that must be separately
accepted by offeror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

additional terms - UCC (no mirror-image rule): both parties are merchants (battle of the forms)

A

Additional terms—automatically included in the K, unless:
- Term materially alters original K (i.e., would result in surprise or hardship);
- Offer expressly limits acceptance to terms of the offer; or
- Offeror objects to new terms within a reasonable time after notice of new
terms is received.
- If one of these exceptions is met, original terms of offer control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

additional or different terms - UCC (no mirror-image rule): one or both parties are NOT merchants EXCEPTION

A

an acceptance expressly conditioned on assent to new/different terms is
treated as a counteroffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

different terms - UCC (no mirror-image rule): both parties are merchants (battle of the forms)

A

(“knock-out” rule)—different terms in offer/acceptance nullify each other, and court uses Article 2’s gap-filling provisions to patch holes in K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

additional or different terms - UCC (no mirror-image rule): acceptance based on conduct

A

if offer and purported acceptance differ too much to create a contract but the parties begin to perform anyway, then UCC allows for a
contract to be recognized with the following terms:
- Any terms actually agreed upon in the parties’ writings, and
- Any supplementary terms filled in by the UCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

consideration - bargain and exchange in general

A

must be a bargained-for legal detriment to the promisee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

consideration - legal detriment and bargained-for exchange

A
  • To constitute sufficient consideration, must be bargained-for in exchange for the promise, promise must induce the detriment, and detriment must induce the promise
  • Consideration can be return promise to do or refrain from doing something, or performance of or refraining from doing some act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

consideration - distinguishing gift from valid consideration

A

Test to distinguish gift from valid consideration is whether offeree could reasonably
believe intent of offeror was to induce the action (if YES, then there is consideration
and promise is enforceable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

consideration - gifts: promissory estoppel

A

Promissory estoppel—if promisor/donor knows that promise to make a gift will
induce substantial reliance by promisee and failure to enforce it would cause
substantial injustice, promise is enforceable

56
Q

adequacy of consideration - subjective value

A

benefit to promisor need not have economic value; if promisor wants it, giving of it will constitute adequate consideration

57
Q

adequacy of consideration - preexisting duty rule (common law)

A

does not qualify as consideration unless promisor gives something in addition
to what is owed, or varies preexisting duty in some way

58
Q

adequacy of consideration - preexisting duty rule EXCEPTION for third parties

A

party’s promise to a third party to perform an act the party is contractually obligated to perform for another is sufficient consideration

59
Q

adequacy of consideration - past consideration

A

modern trend towards enforcing past promises under the material benefit rule

60
Q

adequacy of consideration - executory contract

A

exchange of promises is adequate consideration

61
Q

adequacy of consideration - modification (common law)

A

must be supported by consideration, and agreements to modify K are enforceable if:
- Rescission of existing K and entering into of new K
- Unanticipated difficulties arise and modification is fair and equitable, or
- New obligations arise on both sides

62
Q

adequacy of consideration - modification (UCC)

A
  • Requires only good faith
  • No consideration is necessary
63
Q

accord and satisfaction - accord

A

one party agrees to accept a different performance from the other party to
satisfy the other party’s existing duty

64
Q

accord and satisfaction - satisfaction

A

performance of the accord agreement will discharge both the original
K and the accord K

65
Q

accord and satisfaction - discharge of original K

A

Original K not discharged until satisfaction is complete

66
Q

accord and satisfaction - unliquidated or disputed claim

A

An unliquidated or disputed claim may be discharged by negotiable instrument
(e.g., a check with the note “Payment in full”)

67
Q

illusory promise

A

not legally binding because it is vague or promisor can choose whether or not to honor it

68
Q

can voidable/unenforceable promises still constitute consideration?

A

yes

69
Q

Requirements (buyer agrees to buy all that he requires) and output (seller agrees to
sell all that she manufactures) Ks

A
  • There is consideration because promisor suffers legal detriment
  • Quantities may not be unreasonably disproportionate to estimates
70
Q

legal claim settlement

A

a promise not to assert (or a release of) a claim or defense is not consideration, unless the claim or defense is doubtful or the party promising not to assert (or releasing) the claim believes in good faith that it is valid

71
Q

promises binding without consideration - pay a debt barred by statute of limitations (SoL)

A

new promise to pay debt after SoL
has run is enforceable without new consideration

72
Q

promises binding without consideration - perform voidable duty

A

new promise to perform voidable duty is enforceable if it doesn’t suffer from an infirmity rendering it voidable

73
Q

promises binding without consideration - material benefit rule

A

when a party performs an unrequested service for another party, the modern trend permits the performing party to enforce the promise of payment for material benefits received to extent necessary to prevent injustice (unless donative intent)

74
Q

promises binding without consideration - promissory estoppel

A

(consideration “substitute”)—a promise is binding if:
* Promisor should reasonably expect it to induce action on the part of the promisee or a
third person
* Promise does induce such action, and
* Injustice only avoided by enforcement of promise

75
Q

enforceability - in general

A

a defense to formation or a defense to enforcement may render K void,
voidable, or unenforceable

76
Q

enforceability - void Ks

A

entire contract is null, as if no K existed

77
Q

enforceability - voidable Ks

A

operates as valid K until/unless one party takes steps to avoid it

78
Q

enforceability - unenforceable Ks

A

valid K that cannot be enforced if one party refuses to carry out its terms

79
Q

what are the defenses to formation?

A

(1) mistake
(2) misunderstanding
(3) misrepresentation
(4) undue influence
(5) duress
(6) capacity to K

80
Q

defenses to formation in general

A

no “meeting of minds” due to mistake or misunderstanding, misrepresentation or fraud, undue influence or duress, or lack of capacity

81
Q

what is mutual mistake?

A

both parties are mistaken as to essential element

82
Q

K is generally voidable by party adversely affected for mutual mistake if:

A

-mistake existed when K was formed
-mistake relates to basic assumption of K
-mistake has material impact on transaction, and
-adversely affected party did not assume the risk of mistake

83
Q

can either party avoid K if reformation is available to cure mutual mistake?

A

no

84
Q

what is a unilateral mistake?

A

One party is mistaken as to essential element of K, but either party can enforce K
on its terms

85
Q

unilateral mistake - mistaken party can void K if he didn’t bear risk of mistake and either:

A
  • Mistake would make enforcement of K unconscionable, or
  • Non-mistaken party caused the mistake, had duty to disclose or failed to disclose mistake, or knew or should have known the other party was mistaken
86
Q

what is required to rescind a K for unilateral mistake?

A

must be absence of serious prejudice to other party to rescind K

87
Q

reformation (mutual mistake)

A

Court can reform writing except to extent that rights of third parties who relied on K
would be unfairly affected

88
Q

misunderstanding - in general

A

both parties believe they are agreeing to same material terms, but they in fact agree to different terms

89
Q

misunderstanding - neither party knows or has reason to know

A

no K if material term involved

90
Q

misunderstanding - one party knows or has reason to know

A

K formed based upon meaning of
material term as understood by unknowing party

91
Q

misunderstanding - both parties know terms ambiguous at time of K formation

A

no K unless both parties intended same meaning

92
Q

misunderstanding - waiver

A

one party can choose to enforce K according to other party’s understanding

93
Q

misunderstanding - subjective determination of misunderstanding

A

each party’s knowledge or reason to know of the misunderstanding governs (i.e., not what a reasonable person would know)

94
Q

misrepresentation - in general

A

an untrue assertion of fact (i.e., present event or past circumstance)

95
Q

fraudulent misrepresentation

A

requires proof that:
- The misrepresentation is fraudulent:
-Knowing or reckless false assertion of fact
-With intent to mislead
- The misrepresentation induced assent to the K, and
- Justifiable reliance on the misrepresentation by the adversely affected party

96
Q

nondisclosure

A

conduct to conceal a fact or nondisclosure of a known fact is tantamount to an assertion that the fact does not exist

97
Q

effect - fraud in the factum (execution)

A

fraudulent misrepresentation prevents party from knowing character/essential term of transaction, so no K is formed and apparent K
is void unless reasonable diligence would have revealed K’s true terms

98
Q

effect - fraud in the inducement

A

fraudulent misrepresentation is used to induce another to enter into a K; K voidable by adversely affected party if she justifiably relied on the
misrepresentation

99
Q

nonfraudulent misrepresentation (innocent/negligent)

A

renders K voidable by adversely affected party who justifiably relied on material misrepresentation and was induced to assent to K because of it

100
Q

misrepresentation - effect of party’s fault

A

a party’s fault in not knowing or discovering facts before entering into the K does not prevent the party’s reliance on the misrepresentation from being justified (unless it constitutes a failure to act in good faith)

101
Q

cure of misrepresentation

A

K not voidable if facts cured before deceived party has avoided the K

102
Q

avoidance/reformation for misrepresentation

A

when content/legal effect of K is misrepresented, deceived party can avoid K or reform it to express what was represented

103
Q

undue influence - in general

A

unfair persuasion of a party to assent to a K

104
Q

undue influence - unfair persuasion

A
  • Relationship between dominant party and dependent party due to lack of expertise
    or experience, or diminished mental capacity
  • Persuasion of one party seriously impairs the free and competent judgment of other
    party
105
Q

undue influence - confidential relationship

A

dominant party has burden of proving K was fair (may be held to higher standard of disclosure)

106
Q

undue influence - third party undue influence

A

victim may void K unless nonvictim party to K gave value or materially relied on K in good faith and without knowledge of undue influence

107
Q

undue influence - damages

A

restitution available

108
Q

duress - in general

A

improper threat that deprives party of meaningful choice

109
Q

duress - improper threat

A
  • Threats of criminal or civil action (made in bad faith), or
  • Threats to breach K in violation of good faith and fair dealing
110
Q

duress - deprivation of meaningful choice

A

person has no reasonable alternative such that threat induced his assent

111
Q

duress - effect on K

A

K is void when duress is through physical compulsion and voidable in other instances

112
Q

capacity to K - infancy (under 18)

A

voidable by infant but not by adult (except for reasonable value of necessaries)

113
Q

capacity to K - mental illness

A

K is void for one who is adjudicated mentally incompetent, but only voidable if there has been no adjudication

114
Q

capacity to K - guardianship

A

K is void for individuals under guardianship (except for reasonable value of necessaries)

115
Q

capacity to K - intoxication

A

K is voidable by intoxicated party if she was unable to understand nature/consequences of K and other party knew of intoxication

116
Q

what are the defenses to K enforcement?

A

(1) illegality
(2) unconscionability
(3) public policy

117
Q

defenses to enforcement - illegality

A
  • K is unenforceable if consideration/performance under K is illegal
  • K is void if it contemplates illegal conduct
  • duty to perform is discharged if K becomes illegal after formation
  • if one party is justifiably ignorant of facts making K illegal or lacks illegal purpose he can recover (assuming guilt of other party)
118
Q

defenses to enforcement - illegality EXCEPTIONS (5)

A

(1) ignorance of illegality
(2) lack of illegal purpose
(3) divisible Ks
(4) licensing violation
(5) restitution

119
Q

defenses to enforcement - illegality exception: ignorance of illegality

A

a promisee may recover if the promisee is justifiably ignorant of the facts making K illegal and the promisor had knowledge of the illegality; if both parties are excusably ignorant, the promisee may have a claim in restitution

120
Q

defenses to enforcement - illegality exception: lack of illegal purpose

A

a part who has substantially performed may recover if:
- K does not involve illegal consideration/performance—the party is unaware of the other party’s illegal purpose
- the party knows of the other party’s illegal use—unless the party furthered the illegal use or the use involves grave social harm

121
Q

defenses to enforcement - illegality exception: divisible Ks

A

if K can easily be divided into legal and illegal parts, a party may recover on the legal part(s)

122
Q

defenses to enforcement - illegality exception: licensing violation

A

depends on the purpose of the licensing requirement:
- regulatory purpose—the party who fails to comply cannot enforce the K
- raise revenue—the party who fails to comply can enforce the K

123
Q

defenses to enforcement - illegality exception: restitution

A
  • not in pari delicto—when parties are not equally at fault, the less guilty party may recover under restitution
  • withdrawal—a party who withdraws from an illegal K before the improper purpose has been achieved may recover under restitution when the party has not engaged in serious misconduct
124
Q

defenses to enforcement - unconscionability

A

K is unconscionable when it is so unfair to one party that no reasonable person in the position of the parties would agree to it (e.g., hidden, complex boilerplate language, adhesion Ks)

125
Q

defenses to enforcement - public policy

A

K may be unenforceable if it violates significant public policy

126
Q

implied-in-fact Ks

A

conduct, not words, indicates assent or agreement

127
Q

quasi-Ks

A

a plaintiff confers benefit on a defendant and the plaintiff has reasonable expectation of compensation and court implies K to prevent unjust enrichment

128
Q

quasi-Ks requirements (3)

A
  • Plaintiff conferred measurable benefit on defendant,
  • Plaintiff acted without gratuitous intent, and
  • Unfair to let defendant retain benefit
129
Q

warranties in sale of goods Ks - express warranty

A

Any promise, affirmation, description, or sample that is part of the basis of the bargain, unless it is merely the seller’s opinion

130
Q

warranties in sale of goods Ks - express warranty disclaimers

A

disclaimers that unreasonably negate or limit express warranties are inoperative

131
Q

warranties in sale of goods Ks - implied warranty of merchantability

A
  • implied whenever seller is a merchant (i.e., seller dealing in goods of the kind sold)
  • goods must be fit for their ordinary purpose
132
Q

warranties in sale of goods Ks - implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

A
  • implied whenever seller has reason to know (from any source) buyer has particular use
    for goods and buyer is relying on seller’s skill to select the goods
133
Q

warranties in sale of goods Ks - disclaimer of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

A

disclaimer may use general language but must be in writing and conspicuous

134
Q

warranties in sale of goods Ks - disclaimer implied warranty of merchantability

A

oral or written disclaimer using the term
“merchantability”; writing much be conspicuous

135
Q

warranties in sale of goods Ks - disclaimer of all implied warranties

A

language makes plain that there is no implied warranty (e.g., sold “as is); buyer’s inspection of goods; excluded/modified by course of dealing,
course of performance, or trade usage

contracts & sales (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions