Formulation Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

REASONS FOR CHOOSING A DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION

A

 Drug release in stomach undesirable:
* Drug insoluble or unstable at low pH
* Stomach lining damaged by prolonged contact with drug
* Concentrated drug release needed lower in GI tract
 Achieved by application of an ‘enteric’ coat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ENTERIC COATING FOR DELAYED DRUG RELEASE
Pharmacopoeial requirements:

A

 Dosage form must remain intact in pH 1.2 simulated gastric fluid in the disintegration apparatus for 30 minutes at 37C (United States Pharmacopoeia)
 Dosage form must remain intact in 0.1M HCl in the disintegration apparatus for 2 hours at 37C (British Pharmacopoeia)
 Dosage form must disintegrate within 1 hour in BP mixed phosphate buffer at pH 6.8
 Diluents (fillers) – increase the volume of the material to accommodate easier processing of the drug and to make suitable size for patient
* Lactose
* Sucrose
* Calcium phosphate
 Binders – cement the active and inert components of tablets together to maintain cohesive and discrete portions
* Polyvinyl pyrollidone (PVP)
* Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC)
* Starch paste
Disintegrant – assist tablets to break up in the GI tract (they swell when wet)
* Starch and derivatives e.g. sodium starch glycollate
* Crosspovidone
* Microcrystalline cellulose
NB: Microcrystalline cellulose can act as filler, binder and disintegrant
Glidants (flow enhancers) – added to powdered materials used in tablet/pill production to aid their movement through tabletting machinery
* Silicon dioxide
 Lubricants – ease the release of compressed tablets from their dies, improving the efficiency of manufacturing
* Metal stearates (e.g. magnesium stearate)
* Fatty acids and alcohols
* Talcum powder
 Added (by blending) as a last step just prior to compressing. Can cause problems with dissolution. If granules get coated with too much they become insoluble Film formers/coatings – used to protect against premature physical break‐up and to prevent unwanted environmental interactions. They can mask bad taste and allow pills to be swallowed easily:
* Polymers and plasticizer
* Shellac
* Sugars
 Printing inks – biologically safe dyes used for printing information or company logos on the surface of tablets or capsules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WET GRANULATION END POINT CONTROL

A

 High Shear mixers
* Rapid and reproducible moment to switch off
* Viscosity of the mixture is proportional to mixing blade force. Similarly torque on paddle blade or shaft or property of granule
 Controls:
* Time
* Mechanical monitors (torque, rotation, speed)
* Electrical monitors (current, power)
* Sound, conductance, reflectance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FLUID BED DRYING

A

 At pre-set intervals the drying is stopped and the bag filters are shaken to release product stuck to the fabric
 End Point is by product ΔT (Differential Temp.) on the granule or by exhaust temperature
* PAT using NIR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Common Compression Problems

A
  • Weight control
  • Tablet strength
  • Disintegration time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weight Control

A
  • Bulk density of granulation
    ➢ Review granulation history
  • Poor flowing
    ➢ Review sizing history
    ➢ Confirm environmental conditions are appropriate
    ➢ Check moisture content
  • Machine issues
    ➢ Appropriate fill cam
    ➢ Proper feed frame set up and operation
  • Erratic weights
    ➢ Check for uniform discharge from feed hopper
    ➢ Evaluate for possible flooding of feed frame
    ➢ Confirm tooling has met specifications and is clean
    ➢ Confirm weight control features on press are working properly
    N.B. Always establish acceptable weight control throughout the batch, especially at Run Out.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tablet Strength

A
  • Adjust compression force
    ➢ Remember – tablets with low breaking strength may have been over‐compressed.
    Strength may  with compression force 
  • Study how the tablet fractures during hardness testing
    ➢ If the tablet laminates, suspect low moisture, over‐compression, over‐blending, excessive lubricant, etc
  • Is tablet strength being compromised during ejection?
    ➢ Check for ‘rub marks’ on tablet side band
    ➢ Tablet lamination may reflect tooling issues
    ➢ Damaged (hooked) punch tips
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Disintegration

A

Check compression force. Normally too much but sometimes the opposite
* Check lubricant mix times
* Check lubricant quantities
* Double check particle size distribution of granulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

WEIGHT CONTROL – ‘CAN’T GET WEIGHT?’

A

Bulk density of granulation
* Review granulation history
 Poor flowing
* Review sizing history
* Confirm environmental conditions are appropriate
* Check moisture content
 Machine issues
* Appropriate fill cam
* Proper feed frame set up and operation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Erratic weights

A
  • Check for uniform discharge from feed hopper
  • Evaluate for possible flooding of feed frame
  • Confirm tooling has met specifications and is clean
  • Confirm weight control features on press are working properly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

TABLET STRENGTH/HARDNESS – ‘TOO MUCH OR TOO LITTLE?’

A

Adjust compression force
* Remember: Tablets with low breaking strength may have been over-compressed. Strength may  with compression force 
 Study how the tablet fractures during hardness testing
* If the tablet laminates, suspect low moisture, over compression, over-blending, excessive lubricant etc.
 Is tablet strength being compromised during ejection?
* Check for ‘rub marks’ on tablet side band
 Tablet lamination may reflect tooling issues:
* Damaged (hooked) punch tips

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DISINTEGRATION – ‘TIMES ARE TOO LONG?’

A

Check compression force. Normally too much but sometimes the opposite
 Check lubricant mix times
 Check lubricant quantities
 Double check particle size distribution of granulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Common compression defects

A

 Chipping
 Lamination
 Capping
 Cracking
 Sticking/picking
 Mottled/discoloured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Facility controls:
Warehouse

A

 Access control
* Warehouse personnel
* Other company personnel
* Wagon drivers
 Goods receipt and dispatch areas
 Storage locations
* Groupings by material type
* Returns and rejects
 Pest control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Production facility controls

A

Materials
* Clear flow – IN/OUT
* Use of airlocks

People
* Changing rooms
* Gowning
* Access control
* Handwash

Cross contamination risk
Cross-contamination should be prevented by appropriate design and operation of manufacturing facilities
 The measures should be commensurate with the risks
 Use Quality Risk Management principles to assess and control the risks
 It may be necessary to dedicate premises and equipment for manufacturing and/or packaging operations

Dedicated facilities
Dedicated facilities are required for manufacturing when a medicinal product presents a risk because:
 The risk cannot be adequately controlled by operational and/or technical measures
 Scientific data from the toxicological evaluation does not support a controllable risk
 Relevant residue limits, derived from the toxicological evaluation, cannot be satisfactorily determined by a
validated analytical method

High risk categories
Other antibiotics
 Cytotoxics; particularly low dose materials
 Hormones and certain steroids
 Radio isotopes; health and safety requirements for staff usually mean completely separate facilities
 Narcotics; subject to strict control, e.g. by Home Office in UK
 Other potent or sensitising materials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

GELATINE CAPSULE SUMMARY

A

 Variety of colours, sizes
 Simpler formulations
 Acceptable to patients and easy to use
 Can modify release
 Hard gelatin capsules
* Common dosage form
* Simpler manufacturing process
* Look out for defects
 Soft gelatin capsules
* Used extensively for poorly soluble drugs and oils/lipids
* Specialised manufacturing equipment – longer processing times

17
Q

Tablet coating

A

Sugar coating
 Historically first coating process
 Not used as much today
 Relatively thick coat; >25% tablet weight
 Film coating
 Most common process
 Thin coat; ca. 2% tablet weight

18
Q

Film Coating Materials

A

 Polymer
 Cellulose ethers (HPMC, HPC, MC)
 PVP
 PEGs (high mol weight)
 Plasticiser
 PEGs, glycerine, triethyl citrate
 Glycerol, mineral and vegetable oils
 Colour
 Soluble dyes, pigments (Al lakes, TiO2, iron oxides)
 Natural dyes (riboflavine, carotenoids)
 Solvent
 Water, ethanol, methanol, acetone
 (Methylene chloride)
 Plus?
 Wetting agents
 Flavours
Note: Film coating solutions are a source of microbial growth. They should be freshly prepared (and typically used for up to a maximum of 24 hours as proven by verification/monitoring).

19
Q

Common Coating Faults

A

Colour Variation or Mottling
 Uneven colour
Caused by…
 Too little coating applied
 Inadequate mixing of tablets
 Pan speed too low
 Wrong baffle position
 Poor opacity of solution
 Too few spray guns
 Too many tablets in pan

Roughness or ‘Orange Peel’
 Non‐gloss or dimpled appearance
Caused by…
 Poor atomisation of solution
 Solution viscosity too high
 Solution solids content too high
 Drying temperature too high
 Over‐wetting of tablets
 Too high spray rate

Bridging
 Logo or text debossed on core unreadable
Caused by…
 Design of debossing
 Surface characteristics of tablet
 Lack of porosity
 Hydrophobic ingredients
 Coating solution
 Applied too quickly
 Air in solution
 Viscosity too low

Blistering, Cracking, Splitting and Peeling
 Local detachment of coat
Cracking caused by…
 Expansion of core due to overheating
 Lack of relaxation time following compression
 Poor solution formulation
 Inadequate plasticiser
 Mineral fillers
 Core has different thermal expansion properties to coating solution

Peeling caused by…
 Poor adhesion of coat to tablet core
 Too high spray rate
 Over heating of tablet cores
 Typically above 65°C
 Low mechanical strength of coating

Picking
 Film broken because of adherence to another tablet
Sticking
 Tablets stuck together
Picking and sticking caused by…
 Solution spray rate too high
 Pan speed too low
 Low bed temperature
 Atomisation air pressure too low, leading to poor distribution of coating solution
 Coating of baffles and walls, leading to flaking

Twinning
 Tablets stuck together along edge
Caused by…
 Tablet shape
 Particularly ‘capsule’ shaped tablets
Edge Chipping or Splitting
 Edges chipped, or film broken at tablet edges
Caused by…
 Soft tablet cores
 High friability
 Sharp edges on tablets
 Use punches with deeper concave
 Worn tablet punches
 Pan speed too high
 Spray rate too low
 Coating solution solids content too low

Core Erosion
 Tablet core partially dissolved or eroded
Caused by…
 Soft cores
 High friability
 Core sensitive to moisture
 Pan speed too high
 Spray rate too low
 Try pre‐heating cores
 Start with low rate and then increase

20
Q

COATING PROCESS END POINT

A

 Set quantity of film coating solution/suspension used
 Overall tablet weight gain (%)
 Appearance of film coated tablets

21
Q

Oral solid does finished product testing

A

 Uniformity of Dosage Units
 Uniformity of Content (Assay)
 Uniformity of Mass (weight)
 Disintegration
 Dissolution
 Hardness
 Friability

22
Q

Uniformity of dosage

A

Two Methods
* Content Uniformity
* Calculate Acceptance Value for each from individual assay result
* Mass Variation
* Calculate Acceptance Value from Individual weights using single assay value from the assay test on a composite representative sample

23
Q

Uniformity of content

A

Ph. Eur, USP<905> and JP mostly harmonised
* Applies if content less than 25mg or 25% of tablet weight
* USP also specifies Mass Variation may be used if assay validation has RSD <2%
 Assay individually 10 tablets
 Limits 85 – 115% on 10 tablets but retesting possible if values obtained between 75 – 125%

24
Q

Uniformity of dose

A

Weight of individual 20 tablets
 NMT 2 deviate from average weight by 5, 7.5 or 10% depending on tablet weight
 None deviate by twice percentage

25
Disintegration parameters
Crude measure of 'availability' of drug * Raise and lower in water at 37° * Normally 15 minutes for uncoated tablets
26
Dissolution test
May give better link to bioavailability * Controls batch variability? * Required in all USP monographs * Limited in Ph. Eur. * Enteric coated tablets * But expected in registration dossiers Amount dissolved (Q) in time (T) using specified apparatus and conditions  Calibration and control important * Physical parameters * Temperature and composition of media * Degassing! * Speed, position, wobble etc. of basket or paddle * Performance verification * Mechanical tests * USP calibrator tablets * Prednisone, Salicylic Acid Test carried out on at least 6 tablets * USP → multi stage acceptable criteria up to 24 tablets * Ph. Eur. → Q = 75%, T = 45 min. Retest possible if 1 tablet fails * For enteric coated tablets → 2 stage test * Acid resistance (0.1M HCL) * Higher pH buffer
27
Hardness
Balance required to give robustness and disintegration  Electromechanical test equipment  Calibrate directly or by 'mechanical tablets' Multiple designs of tester * Schleuniger * Erweka * CI  Non destructive by NIR  Combination instrument * Hardness * Thickness * Diameter Breaking strength or hardness refers to the force necessary to cause failure of the tablet under load
28
Thickness
Important in packaging * But beware if you register a specification!
29
Friability
This is a measure of resistance to abrasion * Measure of robustness during coating, packaging and use * Performed on uncoated tablets For uncoated tablets * 10 – 20 tablets * 25±1 rpm for 4 minutes * NGT 1% mass loss Measures resistance to abrasion. Perhaps the most important parameter to consider for forward processing. Tablets with friabilities approaching 0.5% will be very difficult to coat.
30
Liquid formulations
Solution * Single phase liquid system * Solvent and solute(s)  Suspension * Liquid continuous phase, second suspended solid phase  Emulsion * Liquid continuous phase, second emulsified liquid phase Solution Solvent * Aqueous/Non aqueous  Solute * Solubility enhancement  Excipients * Taste masking Solvent Aqueous (water) * Most common * Correct quality grade employed * Purified water * Chemical and microbiological quality  Non-aqueous * Alcohol, glycols, * Unusual * Quality important e.g. potable alcohol (ethanol) Solute Anything dissolved in solvent  Solubility enhancement * pH adjustment * Co-solvent * Surfactant solubilisation * Complexation  Other excipients * Buffers * Tonicity * Viscosity Sweeteners Sucrose * Oldest, best, simplest * Additional benefits * Antimicrobial * Disadvantages * Calorific (diabetics), cariogenic  Other Sugars * Lower sweetening potential  Artificial Agents * Saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame, cyclamate * Low concentrations required * Distinctive taste – mask low sucrose concentrations Flavours Enhance taste masking effect of sweetening agents  Smell and taste e.g. peppermint  Concentrated alcoholic solutions requiring dilution for manufacturing  Natural or synthetic * Synthetic * Cheaper, consistent, stable * Natural * Microbiological quality  Traditional tastes * Antacids – minty Colour Final portion of organoleptic disguise  Match product colour to flavour * e.g. red for strawberry flavour  Requires additives * Not consumer friendly Suspension Three components * Solvent(s) * Continuous liquid phase * Solute(s) * Dissolved in solvent to modify behaviour * Solid phase * Non-dissolved material, discrete particles Ideal suspension Sediment – easily resuspended  Re-suspension – stable * Dose withdrawal  Particle size – uniform * Non-gritty (< 5 μm) Emulsion Three components * Solvent(s) * Continuous liquid phase * Solute(s) * Dissolved in solvent to modify behaviour * Disperse phase * Non-dissolved liquid, discrete particles Disperse phase - common in Topical creams Oil in water * Oil – disperse phase (not more than 60% v/v) * Active ingredient – cod liver oil * Water – continuous phase * Usual system  Water in Oil * Water – disperse phase * Oil – continuous phase * Difficult to process oil into the water phase Emulsifying agent * Surfactant * Polymeric agents  Viscosity enhancers  Density modifiers  Antioxidants  Masking fragrance
31
Liquid manufacture
 Product ingredients * Risk – water, excipients, containers  Manufacturing * Equipment * Closed vessels, distribution, cleaning, filling  Distribution * Storage * Validated hold times * Ref Annex 9 EudraLex Vol. 4 * Consider Contamination Control Strategy Preservative * To deal with “in use” contamination * Not manufacture based contamination  Preservation * Complex area * Product * Suspension/emulsion * Container interaction
32
Inhalation products - Inhalation products – DPI and MDI DPI Dry powder inhalers Breath actuated
 Delivers drug as powder into lungs  May need to ‘load’ the drug  Reservoir or single dose  Need to consider moisture protection Formulation Ingredients  Drug and diluent  Micronisation of API  Particle size of API and excipients  Interactions between drug and diluent  Mixing and segregation  Potential for moisture uptake Actuation Device  Use of capsules, blister strips or chamber system  Mechanical disruption of powder  Moisture risk  Patient use impacts
33
Inhalation production - MDI Metered dose inhalers/aerosol pMDI – pressurised metered dose inhaler
 Used inverted (valve down)  Meters a dose, rather than sprays continuously  Drug and propellants inhaled into the lungs Formulation Ingredients  Particle size of API  Micronisation of API  Solubility characteristics of API – may need adjuvants  Surfactants aid suspension of drug substance  Surfactants aid valve lubrication  Propellants – CFC and HFA
34
Inhalation formulation issues
 Crystals  Creaming and sedimentation  Agglomeration – fused aggregates that have broken away from their surface of origin to become entrained in the formulation with risk of occluding small atomisation orifices * Causing increased variability and/or OOS results in medication delivery data * Causing changes in the aerodynamic profile of the emitted dose How can we eliminate agglomerates or minimise their effect?  Avoiding creaming formulations  Use a bulking agent to minimise the risk of dose variability impact of agglomerates by co-aggregating with the active  Reduce exposure to moisture that helps to fuse the particles in agglomerates – e.g. pouching and / or use of nylon as a desiccant can have a positive impact Valve  Metal or plastic components  Elastomer components  Passivation of metal components  Cleaning  Design process e.g. tail off Canister  Coating Actuators/Spacers/BAIs/Dose Counters  Press and breathe actuators  Spacers – pros and cons  Breath Actuated Inhaler (BAIs) – design and complexity  Dose counters – FDA perspective Active Drug Substance  Particle size – Micronisation  Impurities and Degradation Products Surfactants  Concentrate manufacture Propellants and Adjuvants  Filtration and refrigeration Valve  Pressure filling/cold filling  Crimping process  Valve function testing Canister  ‘O’ ring  Canister marking and cleaning Filtration of all fluids to 0.2 micron – Annex 10  Cold filling  Pressure filling – single and two-stage  100% check weighing (Annex 10)  Optimisation/scale-up/validation – matrixing
35
Inhalation manufacture controls
Facilities  Air classification – minimum Grade D at point of exposure of product or clean components (Annex 10)  Moisture control  Water bath or Heat tunnel Actuator  Stem location  Critical dimension control in moulding  BAI Function testing Documentation  Complex process  Well designed documentation  Many similarities to MDIs Active Drug Substance  Moisture control  Freeze drying Diluent  Particle size  Powder flow characteristics  Many similarities to MDIs Active Drug Substance  Moisture control  Freeze drying Diluent  Particle size  Powder flow characteristics
36
Inhalation release testing
 Identification – drug, propellants, adjuvants  Fill weight/number of doses  Moisture content  Drug content  Adjuvant content  Leakage  Suspension particle size – Malvern and Microscopy Release Testing  Valve delivery  Dose delivered – ex valve or ex actuator (through life)  Respirable dose – Andersen or New Generation Impactor  Impurity and Degradation Products  Foreign particulates  Microbial