Free Movement of Goods Flashcards
(32 cards)
Where is the quote for the definition of FMOG found?
Article 28 TFEU
What are goods?
Comission v Italy Re Art Treasures:
CJEU defined goods as “products which can be valued in money and which are capable, as such, of forming the subject of commercial transactions”
What are the two types of restrictions?
Fiscal restrictions: Concerning money to move goods
Non-fiscal restrictions: Hinderance that is not relating to money (e.g inspections)
What are the types of fiscal restrictions?
- ) Discriminatory internal taxations - Article 110: INTERNAL to a member state
- ) Changes incurred purely because a border is crossed -Art 28 and 30
Article 110
Basically can’t impose any internal taxation on things from other member states that is different to similar domestic products
Humblot case
- Importing of cars from other member states, on the face of it seemed all cars were affected but it only affected importers so indirect discrimination was found
- Gives good indication if products are similar as stated in Art 110
Commission v UK
UK imposed higher tax duty on wine and a lower one on beer
- Beer produced predominantly domestically in the UK however wine was mostly imported
- Are they substitutional: court said yes
Art 30
Customs duties: payments purely for crossing a frontier are prohibited
Commission v Italy
“If there is a charge, no matter how small for goods to cross a border (even if not a customs duty) it is considered to be a customs duty”
What are the two ways an Art 30 duty can be lawful?
- ) Required by EU legislation
2. ) Genuine service rendered where sum charged is proportionate - (e.g Belgium case and for storage )
Article 34:
NON-FISCAL
Quantitative restriction are prohibteded
Geddo case
“Measures which amount to a total or partial restraint of imports, export s or goods in transit “
Essentially anything that is a ban/quota
If there is a QR?
Can it be justified using Art 36?
This is an exhaustive list
Conegate case
- Sex dolls being made in the UK and tried to ban the importation of them due to public morality under art 36
- there was a manufacturer of similar dolls in the UK so the ban was unjustified
Hen and Derby
- Banning of pornography for public morality reason under art 36
- Couldn’t point to a manufacturer in UK so ban was lawful
If there is no justification under art 36?
Unlawful restriction and breach of art 34
If there is justification under art 36?
Has to be proportionate, and no more restrictive than is necessary:
If it is -> Lawful restriction
If not -> Unlawful restriction
What if it’s not a ban/quota?
Maybe a measure equivalent to a quantitative restriction (MEQR)
Dassonville case
“trading rules that may possibly hinder trade” anything that makes trade more awkward
Cassis de Dijon case
2 rules:
- ) Rule of mutual recognition: if a product is accepted in one member state then it is accepted in all
- ) Rule of reason: mandatory requirements in the public interest - Restrictions allowed for indistinctly applicable measures if certain mandatory requirements are met
If not an MEQR:
Restriction is lawful
If it is an MEQR:
Is it distinctly or indistinctly applicable
Distinctly applicable:
Measures that distinguish between domestic and imported goods
Indistinctly applicable:
Measures that don’t distinguish and have an effect of causing a hindrance to the movement of goods