Functionalist, Strain and Subcultural theories Flashcards
(49 cards)
1
Q
(Durkheim-F) outline functionalist’s 2 key mechanisms to achieve solidarity
A
- socialization: instils the shared culture into society’s members so that the have the same norms + values
- social control: conformity to the status quo is rewarded, deviance is punished. this ensures inds behave the way society expects
2
Q
(Durkheim-F) outline the inevitability of crime
A
- while functionalists see too much crime as destabilizing society, they also see crime as inevitable + universal - every society has crime in some form
3
Q
(Durkheim-F) what are the 2 reasons of why crime + deviance is seen in every society
A
1) socialisation: not everyone is equally + effectively socialized into the shared norms + values - e.g. Murry lone parents
2) diversity: in complex modern societies, there is diversity of lifestyle + values. diff groups develop their own subcultures with their own norms + values which deviate from the mainstream
4
Q
(Durkheim-F) define anomie
A
- anomie = when modern societies’ rules governing behaviour become less clear cut (state of normlessness)
- this is due to the complex + specialised division of labour which weakens the shared culture, resulting in higher levels of deviance
4
Q
(Durkheim-F) what are Durkheim’s 3 positive functions of crime
A
- boundary maintenance
- adaption and change
- social solidarity
5
Q
(Durkheim-F) outline boundary maintenance as a positive function of crime
A
- crime produces a reaction from society - uniting its members and reinforcing shared norms + values
- D says this explains the function of punishment - to reaffirm society’s shared rules + reinforce social solidarity
- e.g. the rituals of the courtroom dramatize the crime + publicly shame the offender, thus discouraging rule breaking
5
Q
(Durkheim-F) what does Cohen say about boundary maintenance
A
- Cohen: the media plays an important role in this ‘dramatization of evil’ in which media coverage of crime often creates ‘folk devils’
6
Q
(Durkheim-F) outline adaption and change as a positive function of crime
A
- D says that all change starts with deviance - inds with new ideas/ values mustn’t be suppressed by social control
- initial challenge to any way of living will be seen as deviant
- if those with new ideas are suppressed, society will stagnate and will be unable to make necessary adaptive changes
7
Q
(Durkheim-F) outline an example of adaption and change as a positive function of crime
A
- the murder of George Floyd in 2020 at the hands of a police man kickstarted both social + legislative change
- social: began the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement which brought about social and ideological changes across the US + UK
- legislative: prompted the ‘George Floyd Justice in Policing Acts’ which adressed various aspects of policing, e.g. banning chokeholds when arresting
7
Q
(Durkheim-F) outline 2 other functions of crime
A
- Davis: prostitution acts as a safety valve for the release of men’s sexual frustrations without threatening the nuclear fam
- Cohen: deviance acts as a warning that an institution isn’t functioning properly - e.g. high rates of truancy - issue with education system
8
Q
(Durkheim-F) what did Erikson talk about
A
- Erikson developed Durkheim’s idea that crime is inevitable and argues that if it is a positive function, then society is organised to promote deviance
- the true function of agencies like the police is to sustain a certain level of crime rather than to rid society of it
9
Q
(Durkheim-F) outline AO3 criticisms of Durkheim’s functionalist view of crime
A
- D doesn’t specify how much deviance is necessary for society - only that is it necessary
- just because crime performs these functions isn’t necessarily why it exists in the first place - e.g. strengthening social solidarity for example
- F ignores the negative functions crime performs - e.g. prostitution may act as a safety valve for men, but it isn’t functional for the illegally trafficked sex worker
- crime doesn’t always promote social solidarity + may have the opposite effect - leading people to become more isolated, e.g. women staying indoors to avoid attacks
10
Q
(Merton-St) outline Merton’s strain theory
A
- deviance is the result of strain between 2 things: the goals that a culture encourages individuals to achieve (cultural factors) and what the institutional society allows them to achieve legitimately (structural factors)
- Merton adapted Durkheim’s concept of anomie
10
Q
(Merton-St) what 2 factors does Merton’s explanation explain
A
- cultural factors: the societal emphasis on goals, e.g. wealth/ status + the weaker emphasis on using legitimate means to achieve them
- structural factors: the actual opportunities (/lack thereof) to achieve the goals through approved, legal means (like education or employment)
11
Q
(Merton-St) outline an example of a society where strain occurs
A
the American Dream:
- Americans are expected to pursue this material goal through legitimate means; self-discipline, educational qualifications + hard work in their career
- the ‘American Dream’ entails meritocracy where anyone who makes an effort can get ahead + equal opportunity for all
- the reality is that many disadvantage groups are denied opportunities to achieve legitimately - e.g. inadequate schools + discrimination in the job market can block opportunities for EMs + WC
- furthermore, the AD puts emphasis on achieving success at ANY price - this produces frustration/ the strain to anomie leads to committing crime
12
Q
(Merton-St) outline deviant responses to strain
A
- M says how an individuals position in the social structure affects the way they adapt/ respond to their strain
- there are 5 types of responses depending on if an individual accepts/ rejects or replaces approved cultural goals and the legitimate means of achieving them
13
Q
(Merton-St) what are the 5 types of responses to strain
A
CIRRR
1) Conformity
2) Innovation
3) Ritualism
4) Retreatism
5) Rebellion
13
Q
(Merton-St) outline conformity as a type of response
A
- individuals accept the culturally approved goals + strive to achieve them legitimately
- this is mostly among MC individuals who have good opportunities to achieve - Merton sees it as the typical response of Americans
14
Q
(Merton-St) outline Innovation as a type of response
A
- individuals give up trying to achieve material success legitimately, so use illegitimate means such as theft or fraud to achieve it
- those at the lower end of the class structure are under the greatest pressure to innovate
15
Q
(Merton-St) outline Ritualism as a type of response
A
- individuals give up on trying to achieve material success, but have internalized the legitimate means and so they follow the rules for their own sake
- this is typical of lower-middle class office workers in dead end, routine jobs
16
Q
(Merton-St) outline Retreatism as a type of response
A
- individuals reject both the goals + legitimate means and become dropouts
- e.g. psychotics, the homeless, tramps, drug addicts
16
Q
(Merton-St) outline conformity as a type of response
A
- individuals reject the existing society’s goals + means, but replace them with new ones in a desire to bring about revolutionary change + create a new society
- e.g. political radicals, counter cultures like hippies
17
Q
(Merton-St) outline AO3 evaluations of Merton + his strain theory
A
- Merton takes official stats at face value, which often overrepresent EMs + WC - so M sees crime as a mainly WC phenomenon
- Marxists: Merton ignores the power of the ruling class to make + enforce laws to criminalize the poor
- it only explains utilitarian crimes for material gain, but not crimes of violence, vandalism, state crimes etc
17
Q
(Cohen-Sub/St) outline Cohen’s subcultural - strain theory
A
- Cohen: sees deviance as the product of delinquent subcultures with different values from those of mainstream society
- they provide an alternative opportunity structure for those who are denied the chance to achieve it legitimately (mainly WC)
- subcultures offer a solution + are functional for their members - but not for wider society
- subcultural - strain theories both criticize + build on Merton’s strain theory
18
(Cohen-Sub) does Cohen agree with Merton on status frustration
- yes, Cohen agrees with Merton that deviance is a largely WC phenomenon resulting from the inability to achieve mainstream success goals through legitimate means - such as educational achievement
- BUT, Cohen criticises Merton's explanation of deviance on 2 grounds
19
(Cohen-Sub) what are Cohen's 2 criticisms of Merton's explanation of deviance
1) Merton sees deviance as an individual response to strain, which ignores the fact that much deviance is committed in groups, esp amongst the young
2) M focuses on utilitarian (money) crimes committed, like theft or fraud. this ignores crimes such as assault or vandalism which may have no economic motive
20
(Cohen-Sub) what is Cohen's own view of status frustration
Cohen:
- he focuses on deviance among WC boys, who face anomie in the MC dominated school setting - they suffer from cultural deprivation
- their inability to succeed leaves them at the bottom of the status hierarchy
- this results in status frustration, in which they resolve their frustration by rejecting mainstream MC values + turning to boys in the same situation, e.g. forming a delinquent subculture
20
(Cohen-Sub) outline the alternative status heirarchy
- Cohen: the values of a delinquent subculture are hostile to those outside of it
- the delinquent subculture's values are opposite to mainstream - e.g. school attendance is valued in MS whilst truancy is valued in DS for status
- the subcultures function is that it offers boys an alternative status hierarchy in which they can achieve through their created illegitimate opportunity structure from which they win status
21
(Cohen-Sub) what is a strength of Cohen's status frustration theory
- it offers an explanation for non-utilitarian deviance
- unlike Merton, Cohen's ideas of status frustration, value inversion + alternative status heirarchy explain non-economic delinquency e.g. truancy
21
(Merton+Cohen-Sub) what is a limitation of both Merton and Cohen's status frustration theories
- they both assume that WC boys start off sharing MC mainstream success goals, only to reject them + turn to deviance when they fail
- they ignore the possibility that they didn't share these goals in the first place + so never saw themselves as failure
21
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) what do Cloward and Ohlin say about subcultures
- like Cohen, Cloward + Ohlin base their ideas off Merton's ideas
- they agree that WC youth are denied legitimate opportunities to achieve material success + their deviance stems from this
- C+O notes that not everyone in this situation reacts with deviance (innovation) - e.g. some will turn to drugs
22
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) why do they say different subcultural responses occur
- the key reason isn't only unequal access to the legitimate opportunity structure (as Merton + Cohen say), but its the unequal access to illegitimate opportunity structures as well
- e.g. different neighbourhoods provide different illegitimate opportunities for young people to learn criminal skills + develop criminal careers
- there are 3 types of deviant subcultures (criminal, conflict, retreatist)
23
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) name Cloward and Ohlin's 3 types of deviant subcultures
- criminal subcultures
- conflict subcultures
- retreatist subcultures
23
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) outline the criminal subculture
criminal subculture:
- this provides youths with an apprenticeship for a career in utilitarian crime
- they arise in neighbourhoods with a long term + stable criminal culture with an established hierarchy of professional adult crime
- this allows the young to associate with adult criminals who select those with the right abilities to provide them with training for the criminal career ladder
24
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) outline the conflict subculture
conflict subculture:
- arise in areas of high population turnover
- this results in high levels of social disorganisation + prevents a stable professional criminal network from developing
- this means the only illegitimate opportunities are within loosely organised gangs - in which provide a release for young men's status frustration
- this subculture is most similar to the one described by Cohen
24
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) outline the retreatist subculture
retreatist subculture:
- in any neighbourhood, not everyone who aspires to be a professional criminal/ gang leader succeeds - as like in the legitimate opportunity structure, where not everyone achieves a well paid job
- the people who fail to get a well paid job or a professional criminal career turn to a retreatist subculture based on illegal drug use
25
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) outline AO3 evaluations of Cloward and Ohlin
- like Merton + Cohen, they agree that most crime is WC, which ignores crimes of the wealthy - their theories over-predict WC crimes
- their 3 types of subcultures are too distinctualized; in reality people belong to more than one of these subcultures - e.g. the drug trade is both the conflict + criminal subcultures
- Miller: the WC has its own independent subculture separate from mainstream culture with its own values, and so wouldn't feel status frustration from 'failure' to meet mainstream norms
26
(strain) outline recent strain theories
- recent strain theorists argue that young people may pursue a variety of other goals than material success - e.g. popularity among peers, freedom from parents etc
- like earlier strain th. they argue that failure to achieve these goals may result in delinquency and that MC youth also have issues with achieving the mainstream goals, which explains MC delinquency
27
(Strain) outline the institutional anomie theory
- like Merton, Messner + Rosenfeld's institutional anomie theory focuses on the American Dream
- its obsession with material success pressures people towards crime by encouraging an anomic cultural environment where people are pushed to adopt a mindset of achieving material success at any cost which undermines other institutions
- M + R say that in any free market capitalist countries + with weak welfare provisions, like USA, crime is inevitable
28
(Strain) outline an A02 example of Messner + Rosenfeld's institutional strain theory
- Savelsberg: found that in post communist countries, such as in Eastern Europe, there was a high rise in the crime rate after the 1989 fall in Communism
- he attributes this rise to Communisms collective values being replaced by new Western capitalist goals of individual material success
29
(Durkheim-F) when is crime dysfunctional
- when there is too little (society is repressing members) or too much (divides society) crime, its an indication that there is something wrong with society + shows when crime is dysfunctional
- BUT; this is a vague statement - how much is too little/much?
30
(Func) outline prostitution as having positive function of crime
- P allows for the continuity for the nuclear fam as M can release their sexual desires + acts as a safe valve for M's sexual frustrations
- can prevent rape as M release their sexual tensions consensually through paid prostitutes
- P also provides a means for WC women to earn money without the need for qualifications
31
(Func) outline the Baltimore Riots as having positive function of crime
- Baltimore Riots, 2015: were a public reaction to the death of a Black man, Freddie Gray, who died due to police violence against him
- protests were organised which became violent - at least 20 police officers were injured, 250 people arrested, thousands of officers + troops deployed + a state emergency was declared
- Funcs: this acted as an example for wider society for what happens when people defy the social consensus + state (death, arrests) - boundary maintenance
- this also enables social change + raises awareness, but can also cause a reversal of social change if police clamp down on rights - social change
32
(Func) outline 9/11 as having positive function of crime
- on Sept 11th, 2001, the Islamic extremist group 'Al-Qaeda' carried out a terrorist attack by flying 2 planes into the Twin Towers, and a 3rd plane hitting the Pentagon
- over 3,000 people died from which the world came together to express their concern, anger + sorrow over the attacks
- Funcs: heightened security + police power (social change), people came together (social solidarity) - e.g. inc support of police officers, firefighters (of whom 400 died helping), slogans like 'United We Stand' were used
33
(Durkheim-F) outline social solidarity as a positive function of crime
- crime, e.g. 9/11, reinforces societies commitment to shared norms + values (reaffirms shared rules + strengthen social cohesion)
34
what is an AO3 evaluation of the positive effects of the 9/11 attacks
- Labelling theorists: rather than bringing people together, crime can marginalise groups further - when crime is committed, whole groups tend to be stigmatised + excluded
- 9/11 attacks heightened xenophobia + stereotyping against Asian/ Muslim groups, led to more hate crimes + victimisation of EMs
- it also increased fragmentation + racial divides within society
35
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) outline an AO2 example of a criminal subculture
criminal subculture - American Mafia:
- in New York City, there are Italian-American organised crime network which are highly structured, with a hierarchy, headed by a boss who has unquestioned authority w/ a 2nd in command
- to join, there must be an initiation of an oath of loyalty
- its a lifetime commitment
36
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) outline an AO2 example of a conflict subculture
conflict subculture - Chicago gangs:
- formed as a response to WC oppression to feel part of a community + seek status
- values loyalty + aims to protect community
- is a semi-autonomous structure - less hierarchical + structured
37
(Cloward + Ohlin-sub) outline an AO2 example of a retreatist subculture
retreatist subculture - LGBTQ+ community:
- LGBTQ+ community faces marginalisation, discrimination, exclusion from wider society
- they form alternative subcultures/ communities in which they reject mainstream heteronormative gender + sexuality norms, form their own spaces (e.g. drag culture, underground clubs) and may turn to drugs/ alcohol as a coping mechanism
