Gender Flashcards

(42 cards)

1
Q

lakoff 1975

A
women's language weak
hypercorrect grammar e.g avoiding double negatives
over-apologising
empty adjectives e.g lovely
tag questions e.g arent you?
overuse of intensifiers e.g so
special lexicon e.g colour
less swearing 
lack a sense of humour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

kira hall

A

phone sex workers used lakoff’s features to seem more feminine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

economic and social research council 2017

A

500% increase in the word ‘fuck’ by women since the 1990s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

otto jespersen

A

investigated non-fluency features such as pauses and fillers
relies on evidence from literature and travellers
speculative and often dismissed as folk linguistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

otto jespersen attitudes

A

women have a smaller vocab
women use ‘weak’ and ‘empty’ adjectives
women fail to finish sentences because they haven’t thought about what they’re going to sya
men are responsible for adding new words to the language
women have a damaging effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

deficit model

A

women’s language is weak or contains weak traits
theory originates from otto jespersen’s book in 1922
men have more superior place within society - women’s speech inferior
women have a lack of something which makes their speech more inferior to men’s as theres’ is more desirable
women’s responsibility to change their language contradicts lakoff’s feminist views
men’s language is more powerful as unmarked forms are the norm biased towards men

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

deficit features

A

women speak less
softer modal auxiliary verbs to express uncertainty
polite forms e.g euphemisms
indirect requests
question intonation in declarative statements to express uncertainty
hedging e.g sort of

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

o’barr and atkins courtroom study

A

challenges lakoff
lower class men use lakoff’s language features
implies it is potentially got nothing to do with gender but power
‘powerless language’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

weakness of lakoff’s research

A

based purely on own observations
own experiences and opinions
didn’t carry out linguistic rigorous testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

janet holmes

A

looked into way women are referred to affectionate nominatives
predominately from semantic fields of food and animals
‘sugar’ ‘cow’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

dale spender

A

culture of ‘male as norm’
men are dominant and women are add ons
men are introduced first, symoblic of their role
‘mothers and fathers’ women maternal role
‘mankind’ add to the norm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

gender neutral words

A

backlash of ‘history’
claim history is story of men
caused reshuffling and reclaiming of words e.g headteacher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

dominance model

A

examine language use in respect to men being more dominant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

schulz and lakoff

A

research into terms that women and men are referred to
terms to identify them as different
‘-ess’ suffix marks fenimine equivalent
semantic derogation - negative connotations e.g mistress conotation of prostitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

zimmerman and west 1975

A

interruptions between men and women
men interrupted 96-100% of the time
small number of subjects; white, middle class, under 35

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

zimmerman and west weakness

A
not a representative sample - research flawed and not necessarily investigating what they think they are investigating
research shows traits typical of middle-class conversations but maybe atypical of all conversations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

beattie

A

considered over 10 times the corpus of z and w
pretty much equal number of interruptions by men and women
much larger sample and representative - more accurate

17
Q

pamela fishman

A

conversations between men and women fail because of how men act
men use 1/3 of questions as women and minimal responses
women doing ‘conversational shitwork’

18
Q

stanley 1970s

A

number of insults for women against men
220 insults to describe promiscuous women
20 insults for promiscuous man

19
Q

tyger drew honey 2015

A

asked people in the street how they would describe a woman who slept with over 30 men vs man sleeping with over 30 women
men and women described the woman as ‘slag’ and ‘slut’
man was labelled ‘lad’

20
Q

jennifer coates

A

researched all male and all female groups
converse differently although topics similiar
techniques used by women to maintain conversation arent signs of inferior signs of intelligence

21
Q

victoria bergvall

A

discussing so called differences reinforces views they exist

22
Q

susan githens

A

women treated on norms of men
supports tannen
women invading seen as unfeminine
‘women and men have different styles, male is standard’ hurting both

23
Q

deborah jones

A

gossiping amongst women - ‘house talk’
scandal - discuss behaviours of others
bitching - expression of anger, just as relief
chatting - intimate form of gossiping where mutually disclose and nurturing takes place

24
kuiper
all male talk amongst rugby team challenges idea men are less supportive as they are in different ways using insults to show solidarity
25
kate millett
'tone and ethos of men's house culture is sadistic, power-orientated and latently homosexual, frequently narcissistic in its' energy and motives'
26
jane pilkington 1992
women aim for positive politeness | men are less supportive
27
holmes research to development of model 1984
challenged lakoff affective tag questions used for care and consideration referential tag questions softening and facilitative 51 women 39 men 70% compliments given 76% women men other men 10% women complimented on appearance men on abilities and possessions
28
tannen
``` high involvement (men) active role - leading ,back channeling ( yep, uh-uh) high considerateness (women) speak more slowly and avoid talking at the same time as someone else report talk (men) direct - reporting on something rapport talk (women) - create and sustain friendships ```
29
tannen sub cultures
advice v understanding - men find a solution rather than understand orders v proposals - men use more imperatives, women use more ameliorated requests status v support - men in control, women be supported information v feelings - men factual information, women emotional overview independence v intimacy - men independent, women intimacy conflict v compromise - men conflict, women compromise
30
difference model
different sub-cultures | men and women are inherently different
31
hyde 2005
no significant differences in the difference in verbal ability between men and women
32
the female brain book
women almost talk 3x as much as men
33
liberman
the female brain book has no statistics to back it up | people ignored liberman's views as the book already backed up stereotypes
34
janet hyde
psychology of women and focused on gender differences in adolescences technique of meta-analysis (combining findings from independent studies) looked at whether same sex schools are better differences in gender in certain areas but results negligible
35
deborah cameron
``` gender only makes up lingusitic identity different situations different gender performing gender gender must be viewed differently to sex so many variables so it is hard to construct research ```
36
judith butler
theory of performativity construct gender based on how you behave and language you use language linguistically determines you
37
northwestern uni in 2004
supports valentova and havlicek findings lesbian gay and bisexual people showed no difference at birth in vowel production chose to selectively adopt vowel productions of certain social groups gay/bisexual men did not adopt vowel sounds from women lesbian/ bisexual women did not adopt vowel sounds from men
38
valentova and havlicek
czech linguists investigated someone's perceived sexual orientation whether or not tell a man sexuality based on aesthetics and voice could detect based on voice and appearance certain feminity in the voice of homosexual men elongated vowel /l/ e.g towel
39
pennebaker 2007
``` 396 uni students 186 men 210 women 30 secs ambient noise every 12.5 mins in conversations using EAR estimated total number of words spoken assuming 17 hrs awake most verbose - man 47000 daily most economic - man 500 daily sexes came out evenly 16,215 men, 15,669 women average number about the same depends on context wider variation between same sex lot of data - valid collected data on chatter patterns ```
40
william leap
'lavender linguistics' sociolect of homosexuals whole other language when homosexuals interact with heterosexuals and homosexuals with other homosexuals
41
diversity model
more differences between genders than between them