Gender Flashcards

(108 cards)

1
Q

Key Concepts- Sex

  • What status does sex refer to?
  • What is it a result of, what does this mean?
  • How is it determined?
  • What does this influence?
A
  • Sex refers to persons biological status, Male or Female
  • It is innate, biologically determined, result of nature
  • Determined by pair of sex chromosomes, Male (XY), Female (XX)
  • These influence hormonal differences as well as anatomy differences
  • This includes hair growth, reproductive organs, body shape
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Key Concepts- Gender

  • What status does gender refer to?
  • What is included in assessing masculinity and femininity?
  • What heavily influences this?
  • What is gender a result of?
  • What is gender considered to be, what is this?
  • Is gender fixed?
  • What could influence an individual’s masculinity or femininity?
A
  • Gender refers to psychological status, masculine or feminine
  • Includes attitudes, roles and behaviours associated with “being man”, “being woman”
  • These are heavily influenced by social norms, cultural expectations
  • Gender partly environmentally determined, result of nurture
  • Gender assigned, social construct rather than biological fact
  • A social construct is an idea created and accepted by people in a society
  • Gender not fixed (partially environmentally determined), fluid and open to change
  • Individual becomes more masculine or feminine depending on social context and the norms and expectations associated with it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key Concepts- Gender dysphoria

  • What is gender dysphoria?
  • How may an individual deal with this?
A
  • For most bio sex and gender identity correspond (bio male masculine, bio female feminine)
  • Some experience gender dysphoria, bio sex not reflect way they feel inside, gender identity
  • May choose to have gender reassignment surgery in order to bring sexual identity in line with gender identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Key Concepts- Sex-role stereotypes

  • What is sex-role stereotypes?
  • Who reinforces these?
  • What could this lead to?
A
  • Set of shared expectations, people in society or culture hold about what is acceptable or unusual behaviour for men and women
  • Reinforced by parents, peers, media, schools.
  • Could lead to sexist assumptions, e.g., woman can’t cope with position of high responsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Defining Androgyny

  • What is Androgyny, give an example?
  • What did Sandra Bem develop?
  • What did this suggest, what was the reason for this?
  • Who can be classified as androgynous?
A
  • A personality type that is characterised as a balance of masculine and feminine traits, attitudes and behaviours
  • For example, man or women competitive (masculine) but also caring (feminine)
  • Sandra Bem developed method of measuring androgyny
  • Suggested high androgyny associated with psychological well being
  • Individuals who are balanced better equipped to adapt to a range of situations
  • Non-androgynous people would find this difficult, narrower range of traits to draw on
  • Both men and women can be classified as androgynous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Measuring Androgyny, The Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI)

  • Describe the procedure of BSRI (1974)
  • How were scores classified?
  • When is an individual classified as Masculine?
  • When is an individual classified as Feminine?
  • When is an individual classified as Androgynous?
  • When is an individual classified as Undifferentiated?
A
  • Sandra Bem’s (1974) scale presents 20 masculine characteristics, 20 feminine characteristics and 20 neutral traits
  • Respondents rate themselves, 7-point rating scale for each item (1 “never true of me”, 7 “always true of me”)
  • Scores classified on the basis of two dimensions masculinity-femininity and androgynous-undifferentiated
  • High Masculine Low Feminine- Masculine
  • Low Masculine High Feminine- Feminine
  • High Masculine High Feminine- Androgynous
  • Low Masculine Low Feminine- Undifferentiated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation of BSRI

A
  • Quantitative approach (Bem 1974, Spencer 1984)
  • Validity and Reliability (Bem 1974)
  • Counterpoint (Temporal Validity)
  • Self-awareness
  • Reductionist (Adams and Sherer 1985)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quantitative approach (Bem 1974, Spencer 1984)

A
  • Strength of Bem’s work, androgyny measured quantitatively
  • Numerical approach useful to quantify a dependent variable for example
  • Spence (1984) argues more to gender than behaviours typical of male or female
  • Compromise is combination, for example Personal attribute questionnaire (PAQ) adds another dimension (instrumentally and expressivity)
  • Suggest both qualitative and quantitative approaches may be useful for studying different aspects of androgyny
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Validity and Reliability (Bem 1974)

A
  • At the time, appeared to be valid and reliable way of measuring androgyny
  • Scale developed, 50 male 50 female rate 200 traits, how much traits represented “maleness” or “femaleness”
  • Traits that scored highest in each category became 20 masculine 20 feminine on scale
  • BSRI piloted with 1000+ students, results broadly corresponded with ppts own description of their gender identity, demonstrates validity
  • Follow up study, smaller sample size same students, similar scores produced one month later, demonstrates test-retest reliability
  • Suggests test is both valid and reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Counterpoint (Temporal Validity)

A
  • Developed over 40 years ago, behaviours regarded as “typical” and “acceptable” in relation to gender changed significantly
  • Scale made up of stereotypical ideas, outdated, only used people from US
  • Notions of maleness and femaleness may not be shared across all cultures and societies
  • Suggest BSRI may lack temporal validity and has low generalisation, not a suitable measure of gender identity today
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-awareness

A
  • Limitation of BSRI, people may not have insight into their degree of masculinity, femininity or androgyny
  • People rate themselves, relies on people having understanding of their personality and behaviour
  • Gender is a social construct, more open to interpretation
  • Scoring system is subjective, people’s application of the scale may differ
  • Suggests BSRI may not be an objective, scientific way of assessing M, F and A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reductionist (Adams and Sherer 1985)

A
  • Assumes that Gender identity is based on a single score
  • Multiple factors make up gender identity
  • Reductionist, too simplistic
  • Adams and Sherer (1985), 101 undergraduate students compared using BSRI
  • Found those who scored highly on masculine traits (both male and female) displayed high levels of assertiveness and self-efficacy
  • Bem states these traits are primarily associated with androgynous people
  • This research therefore contradicts Bem’s statement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The role of chromosomes

  • What are Genes?
  • What are chromosomes made from, what is their role?
  • How many chromosomes in the human body, how many pairs?
  • What pair of chromosomes determine the biological sex?
  • What do normal egg cells have, what does sperm carry?
  • How is a babies sex determined?
  • What gene does the Y chromosome carry
  • What does this gene cause and produce?
A
  • Genes are short sections of DNA, determine characteristics of living thing
  • Chromosomes are made from DNA, they carry information (info is in the form of genes)
  • 46 Chromosomes, 23 Pairs in human body, 23rd pair determines biological sex
  • Normal egg cells produced by human ovary have an X chromosome
  • Sperm carry X or Y chromosome, baby sex determined by sperm that fertilises the egg
  • Y chromosome carries gene called “sex determining region Y” (SRY)
  • SRY gene causes testes to develop in XY embryo
  • Testes produce androgens (male sex hormones)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The role of hormones

  • What is gender development influenced by?
  • What are hormones, how do they travel in the body?
  • What happens prenatally referring to hormones?
  • What triggers development of secondary sexual characteristics?
  • Give an example of one secondary sexual characteristic
  • What is the difference between males and females referring to hormones?
  • What is the primary importance in male development?
A
  • Gender development comes through the influence of hormones
  • Hormones are chemical messengers that affect target organ, circulate in the blood
  • Before birth (Prenatally) in womb, hormones act upon brain development, causes development of reproductive organs
  • At puberty, burst of hormonal activity triggers development of secondary sexual characteristics (pubic hair)
  • Males and Females produce many of same hormones, different concentrations
  • Primary importance in, male development is androgynes such as testosterone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Testosterone

  • What is testosterone?
  • What does it control?
  • What happens if a genetic male produces no testosterone during foetal development?
  • What happens if a genetic female produces testosterone during foetal development?
  • What are high levels of testosterone linked to?
  • Describe the evolutionary explanation for this
A
  • Male hormone, present in small quantities in women
  • Controls the development of male sex organs during foetal development
  • If genetic male produces no testosterone during this time, no male sex organs appear
  • If genetic female produces high levels of testosterone during this time, male sex organs may appear
  • High levels testosterone linked to aggression because its adaptive (evolutionary explanation)
  • Aggression towards rivals, males compete to mate with fertile female
  • Women tend to children, men more likely to take hunter role, success enhance by aggressiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Oestrogen

  • What is oestrogen?
  • What does it cause?
  • What are these effects referred to as?
  • What do researches say about the disorder linked to this?
A
  • Female hormone, determines female sexual characteristics and menstruation
  • Alongside physical changes, causes heightened emotionality and irritability during the menstrual cycle
  • Referred to as premenstrual syndrome (PMS) when effects become diagnosable disorder
  • Existence of PMS as a viable medical category is disputed between some researchers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Oxytocin

  • What does oxytocin do, what does this make possible?
  • When is it release in large quantities?
  • What does it do to new mothers?
  • What is suggested about men referring to oxytocin?
A
  • Women typically produce this in much larger amounts than men, result of giving birth
  • Hormone stimulates lactation, makes it possible to breastfeed, reduces stress hormone cortisol
  • Facilitates bonding, referred to as “love hormone”
  • Released in massive quantities during labour and after childbirth
  • Makes new mothers feel “in love” with child
  • Men produce less, however evidence suggests both M and F produce oxytocin in roughly equal amounts during amorous activities (kissing, sex)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Evaluation for the role of sex hormones in gender development

A
  • Evidence of testosterone (Wang et al 2000)
  • Counterpoint (O’Connor et al 2004)
  • Social factors ignored (Hofstede et al 2010)
  • Reductionist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evidence of testosterone (Wang et al 2000)

  • What does this evidence support?
  • What is male hypogonadism?
  • What was Wang’s procedure?
  • What did Wang discover?
  • What does this show about testosterone?
A
  • Evidence supports the role of sex hormones in gender development in mature males
  • Wang et al (2000) confirmed link between increased testosterone and sexual behaviour
  • Male hypogonadism, condition where testes fail to produce normal levels of testosterone
  • 227 men with this given testosterone therapy for 180 days
  • Changes monitored, found improved sexual function, libido and mood
  • Demonstrates testosterone exerts a powerful, direct influence on male sexual arousal as well as physical development in adulthood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Counterpoint (O’Connor et al 2004)

  • What does other evidence of testosterone suggest?
  • Describe the procedure of O’Conner et al 2004
  • What did he find?
  • What does this suggest?
  • What type of study was is, evaluate this
A
  • Other evidence on effect of testosterone less convincing
  • O’Conner et al (2004), double blind, placebo study, increased testosterone levels in healthy young men
  • One group given drugs that boost testosterone another given placebo
  • Double blind and placebo controls investigator effects and demand characteristics
  • No significant increases in interactional (frequency of sex) or non-interactional (sex-drive) components of sexual behaviour
  • Experienced no change in aggression or anger levels
  • Suggests additional testosterone may have no effect on sexual or aggressive behaviour
  • Does not challenge role of testosterone in early development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Social factors ignored (Hofstede et al 2010)

  • What did Hofstede et al 2010 claim?
  • What did these researchers equate?
  • Give an example of an advanced capitalist society, describe them
  • What does this suggest?
A
  • Limitation of bio accounts, ignore role of social factors in gender-related behaviour
  • Hofstede et al 2010 claimed gender roles more a consequence of social norms than biology
  • Equated notions of masculinity and femininity with whether whole cultures are individualist or collectivist
  • Countries place individual competition; independence above needs of community more masculine in their outlook
  • Includes advanced capitalist societies (US and UK)
  • Traditional masculine traits more highly valued within these societies
  • Challenges bio explanations of gender behaviour, suggests social factors more important in shaping gender behaviour and attitudes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Reductionist

  • How is role of chromosomes and hormones reductionist?
  • Give two alternative explanations not considered
  • What does this suggest about gender?
A
  • Accounts reduce gender to level of chromosomes and hormones
  • Accused of ignoring or underplaying alternative explanations
  • Cognitive approach, attention to influence of thought processes, schema
  • Psychodynamic approach, attention to importance of childhood experiences, interaction within family
  • Areas not adequately explained by biological model
  • Suggest gender more complex than biological influences alone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Atypical sex chromosome patterns

  • Definition
A

This is any sex chromosome pattern that deviates from XX/XY, associated with physical and psychological symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Klinefelter’s syndrome

  • How much people does this affect?
  • Who is affected, what is their chromosome structure?
  • What fraction unaware they have the syndrome?
A
  • Example of atypical sex chromosome pattern, affects 1 in 600 males
  • People affected are males, have anatomy of male but chromosome structure (XXY)
  • Two thirds people not aware they have the syndrome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Physical Characteristics of Klinefelter’s syndrome * List the physical characteristics
* Reduced body hair, breast development, softer/rounder body shape * Long gangly limbs, underdeveloped genitals, problems with co-ordination, general clumsiness * Susceptible to health problems, more commonly found in females such as breast cancer
26
Psychological Characteristics of Klinefelter’s syndrome * List the psychological characteristics
* Linked to poorly developed language skills and reading ability * Tend to be passive and shy, lack interest in sexual activity * Do not cope well with stress, exhibit problems with memory and problem solving
27
Turner’s syndrome * How much people does this affect? * Who is affected, what is their chromosome structure?
* 1 in 500 females have this disorder * Caused by absence of X chromosome (XO), have 45 rather than 46 chromosomes * This results in developmental abnormalities and infertility
28
Physical Characteristics of Turner’s syndrome * List the physical characteristics
* Do not have menstrual cycle, ovaries do not develop leads to infertility * Do not develop breasts, broad “shield” chest, low set ears, webbed neck * High waist-to-hip ratio, physically immature, retain appearance of prepubescent girls
29
Psychological Characteristics of Turner’s syndrome * List the psychological characteristics
* Higher-than-average reading ability * Performance on spatial, visual memory, mathematical tasks often lower than average * Tend to be socially immature, trouble relating to peers, difficulty “fitting in”
30
Evaluation of Atypical sex chromosome patterns
* Nature-nurture debate * Counterpoint (Could be nurture) * Real-world application (Herlihy et al 2011) * Sampling issue (Boada et al 2009)
31
Nature-nurture debate
* Strength, Contribution to nature-nurture debate * Comparing people with syndrome with typical individuals, possible to see psych and behv differences between two groups * For example, people with Turner syndrome, higher verbal ability, talk more than “typical” girls * Differences have bio basis, direct result of abnormal chromosomal structure * Supports view that innate “nature” influences have powerful effect on psychology and behaviour
32
Counterpoint (Could be nurture)
* Relationship between syndromes and atypical chromosomal patterns not causal * May be environmental and social influences more responsible for behv differences observed * Social immaturity may arise from being treated “immaturely” * Peers, Parents etc may react in way that encourages immature behaviour * Indirect impact upon performance at school (hence specific learning developmental problems identified) * Suggests it’s wrong to assume psych and behv differences are due to just nature, could also be nurture
33
Real-world application (Herlihy et al 2011)
* Strength of research, its application to managing the syndromes * Continued research likely to lead to earlier, more accurate diagnoses of syndromes * Also, more positive outcomes in future * Herlihy et al (2011) study of 87 individuals with Klinefelter’s syndrome * Showed those who identified and treated from young age experienced significant benefits in terms of managing syndrome compared to people diagnosed in adulthood * Suggests increased awareness has useful real-world application
34
Sampling issue (Boada et al 2009)
* Limitation, sampling issue * In order to identify characteristics of XXY and XO individuals, necessary to identify large number of individuals to build database * Full range of characteristics seen from mild to severe * In general, only people with most severe symptoms identified * Therefore, picture of typical symptoms may be distorted * Boada et al (2009) reports that prospective studies produced more accurate picture of characteristics * Many individuals with Klinefelter’s do not experience significant cog or psych problems * Many highly successful academically and in their personal lives and careers * Suggests typical picture of syndrome may well be exaggerated
35
Cognitive Explanations of Gender development * What are the two cognitive explanations of gender development?
There are two cognitive explanations of gender development, Kohlberg’s cognitive-developmental theory of gender and Gender Schema Theory (GST).
36
Kohlberg’s Theory- Stages in Development * What idea is the theory based on? * What is the link to age? * What is the understanding of gender parallel to? * What are the 3 stages? * Describe transition between stages
* Theory based on idea that child’s understanding of gender more sophisticated with age * This includes appropriate gender roles behaviours and attitudes * Link to age not experience, its bio maturation (brain matures, thinking matures) * Understanding of gender parallel to intellectual development as child matures biologically * 3 stages, ages suggested approximate, reflects transition between stages is gradual not sudden * The 3 stages are Gender identity, Gender stability and Gender constancy
37
Kohlberg’s Theory- Gender identity (Stage 1) * What is the child able to do at age ()? * What are most children able to do at age ()? * How far is their understanding at this stage? * Give an example
* Age 2, child able to correctly identify themselves as boy or girl (Gender identity) * Age 3, most can identify other people and correctly respond to questions * Example of question, “Which of these like you?”, pictures shown of males and females * Understanding is only simple labelling at this stage, often do not view gender as fixed * Example, 2-year-old boy says “Grow up to be a mummy”
38
Kohlberg’s Theory- Gender stability (Stage 2) * What does the child realise at age ()? * How do they apply this logic, what does this mean? * What do they also believe at this stage?
* Age 4, realisation always stay same gender over time (Gender stability) * This logic not applied to other people, still confused by external changes in appearance * Example, man long hair, describe them as woman * Also believe people change gender, engage activities associated with different gender * Examples, Female builder, Male nurse
39
Kohlberg’s Theory- Gender constancy (Stage 3) * What does the child recognise/realise at age ()? * How do they apply this logic, what does this mean? * What does the child begin to seek at this stage? * What happens when child has a developed and internalised concept of gender? * What does this lead to?
* Age 6, recognises gender constant across time and situations * This understanding applied to other people’s gender as well as their own * No longer fooled by outward appearance, male in dress still man (may find it unusual) * Child begins to seek gender appropriate role models to identify with and imitate * According to Kohlberg, once child has a fully developed and internalised concept of gender * Embark on active search for evidence that confirms that concept * This leads to a tendency towards gender stereotyping at this age
40
Evaluation for Kohlberg’s Theory
* Research support (Damon 1977, Slabby and Frey 1975) * Counterpoint (Bussey and Bandura 1999, Campbell 2004) * Methodological issues (Bem 1989) * Cross Cultural support (Munroe et al 1984)
41
Research support (Damon 1977, Slabby and Frey 1975)
* Strength, evidence to suggest gender stereotyping emerges around age 6 * Damon (1977) told children story about George, boy who like to play with dolls * Children asked to comment, 4-year-olds said its fine * 6-year-olds thought it was wrong, demonstrating gender stereotyping (rules) * Suggest children who achieve constancy form rigid stereotypes on gender appropriate behaviour * Also, evidence supporting the gender constancy stage * Slabby and Frey (1975), children watched video male female doing same tasks * Young children looked both equally, older looked at model who was same sex (role model) * Suggests that Kohlberg was correct, more reliable (Also consider opposite, Imposed etic)
42
Counterpoint (Bussey and Bandura 1999, Campbell 2004)
* Other research challenges idea that gender stereotyping only develops at age 6 * Bussey and Bandura (1999) found children young as 4 reported * “Feel good” playing gender appropriate toys, “bad” when doing opposite * Contradicts Kohlberg, suggests Kohlberg was wrong * Campbell (2004), longitudinal study (same ppts) 56 children ages 2 and 3 * Sat with parent, shown pictures, asked to point to “girls” toy, “boys” toy * 53% point to correct photo age 2, 94% point to correct photo age 3 * Suggests Kohlberg’s theory is weak, out of date (lacks temporal validity) * Environmental factors same (Nurture), Same children (Good reliability)
43
Methodological issues (Bem 1989)
* Limitation, supporting research poor methodology to assess gender constancy * Bem (1989) criticised methodology used in studies linking gender and cog development * Key test in such studies, child understands gender stays same despite changes to appearance and context * Bem argued best way to identify males’ females through physical differences (Genitalia) * In her study, demonstrated 40% children (age 3-5) demonstrated constancy if shown naked photos * Child therefore based judgment on more than clothing * Suggests typical way of testing may misrepresent what younger children actually know * Younger children may also lack the vocabulary to express their understanding
44
Cross Cultural support (Munroe et al 1984)
* Strength, cross cultural support of Kohlberg’s theory * Munroe et al (1984) studied children across cultures * Found children progress through same stages outline by Kohlberg * Suggests sequence may be biologically driven, not down to cultural and social norms * Suggests gender development more Nature than Nurture * Suggests that Kohlberg’s Theory has good ecological validity, can be generalised universally
45
Gender Schema Theory (GST) * What does the theory argue? * What does this theory share with Kohlberg’s theory?
* Martin and Halverson’s (1981), cognitive developmental theory * Argues children’s understanding of gender changes with age (Like Kohlberg’s theory) * Shares Kohlberg’s view that children develop understanding of gender by actively structuring their own learning rather than passively observing, imitating role models
46
Gender schema after gender identity * What is a schema, how is it used by the cognitive system? * What is gender schema? * What happens at around age 2-3? * How does this contrast to Kohlberg’s Theory?
* Schema, mental constructs that develop via experience (some present at birth in basic form) * Used by cog system to organise knowledge around particular topics * Gender schema, generalised representation of everything we know in relation to gender and stereotypically gender appropriate behaviour * Once child established gender identity, around age 2-3, begin search environment for info that encourages development of gender schema * Contrasts Kohlberg’s view (Process only begins after 3 stages, around age 7 with gender constancy)
47
Gender schema determine behaviour * What is young children’s schema likely to be formed around? * What does this provide? * How does this affect a child understanding of themselves? * What happens at the age of 6? * What happens to info that does not fit with the child’s schema?
* Gender schema includes wide range of behvs and personality traits * Young children, schema likely to be formed around stereotypes (boys trucks girls dolls) * Provide framework that directs experience and child’s understanding of itself (“I am boy I play with trucks”) * Age 6, fixed stereotypical idea about what is appropriate for their gender * For this reason, children likely to misremember, disregard info that does not fit with existing schema
48
Ingroup information better remembered * What is the ingroup, what is the outgroup? * What do children pay closer attention to in reference to gender identity? * What does ingroup identity increase? * What develops at age 8?
* Children tend to have better understanding of the schema appropriate to their own gender (ingroup) * Consistent with idea, children pay more attention to info relevant to their gender identity rather than other group (outgroup) * Age 8, elaborate schema for both genders develops as opposed to just their own * Ingroup identity increases child’s level of self-esteem
49
Evaluation of Gender Schema Theory
* Research support (Martin and Halverson’s 1983) * Earlier gender identity (Zosuls et al 2009) * Counterpoint (Specific ages) * Cultural Differences
50
Research support (Martin and Halverson’s 1983)
* Strength, key principles of GST are supported by evidence * Martin and Halverson’s (1983) own study, found Age 6 under more likely remember photos of stereotypically gender-appropriate behv (women wash dishes) than photos of gender-inappropriate behv (women fix car) * When tested a week later above results found, child tend to change gender of person carrying out gender-inappropriate activity in photos when asked to recall them, gender behv was now appropriate * Supports GST, predicts children under 6 years would do this (Contrast to Kohlberg predicted only happen when older)
51
Earlier gender identity (Zosuls et al 2009)
* Limitation, gender identity probably develops earlier than suggested * Longitudinal study 82 children (Zosuls et al 2009), looked at onset of gender identity * Data obtained from twice-weekly reports from mothers on their children’s language age 9 to 21 months * This and video taped analysis of children at play used * Key measure of gender identity, how and when child labelled themselves “boy” or “girl”, occurred on average at 19 months (almost as soon as child begins to communicate) * Suggests children actually have gender identity before this just don’t communicate it * Suggests M and H underestimated ability to use gender labels about themselves
52
Counterpoint (Specific ages)
* May not be appropriate to argue about specific ages * M and H suggest key point is shifts in child’s thinking, ages are averages not absolutes * Possible children move through stages quicker or slower * Sequence of development that is more important * Suggests Z et al findings not fundamental criticism of the theory
53
Cultural Differences (Cherry 2019)
* Another strength, gender schema can account for cultural differences in stereotypically gender appropriate behaviour * Cherry (2019), gender schema not only influence how people process info, also what counts as culturally appropriate gender behaviour * Traditional cultures, believe women carer, men provider raise children, form schema consistent with this view * Societies where perceptions of gender less rigid boundaries, children more likely to acquire more fluid gender schema * M and H Theory can explain how gender schema is transmitted between members of society * Also, can explain how cultural differences in gender stereotypes comes about * Suggests that GST has good validity, can explain cultural differences
54
Psychodynamic explanation of gender development * What is the psychodynamic explanation of gender development?
The psychodynamic explanation of gender development is Freuds psychoanalytic theory
55
Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory * What does his theory suggest? * What are child concepts before phallic stage? * What happens during phallic stage?
* Freud’s (1905) gender developmental theory, children pass through the psychosexual stages * At the phallic stage, gender development occurs (age 3-6) * Prior to this, children have no concept of gender identity, no understanding of male and female * Therefore, they do not categorise themselves or others in this way * During phallic stage, child experiences Oedipus complex (boys) or Electra complex (girls) * This is crucial in the formation of gender identity
56
Oedipus complex * What does this state, what gender is this associated with? * How is this resolved?
* Boys want to have sex with mother, have jealous, murderous hatred for father * Boy recognises father more powerful, fears castration by his father for having feelings towards mother (castration anxiety) * To resolve this, boy gives up love for mother, identifies with father
57
Electra complex * What does this state, what gender is this associated with? * What is the double resentment that develops? * Where does this concept come from, what does it suggest?
* Girls experience penis envy, mother and girl competition for father’s love * Develop double resentment (mother is a love rival, blamed mother for having no penis) * Daughter believes they were castrated by mother at the same time mother castrated herself * Concept of Electra complex came from Carl Jung * Suggested girls accepts they will never have penis overtime, substitutes this with desire to have children * As a result, they identify with their mothers
58
Identification and internalisation * Who identifies with who? * What becomes internalised * How is gender identity obtained?
* Both sexes identify with same gender parent to resolve respective complexes * Adopt attitudes and values of same sex parent * Take on gender identity as well, Freud referred to this process as internalisation * Receive “second hand” gender identity at end of phallic stage * Does not happen gradually, they just obtain gender identity at once there and then
59
Little Hans * What is this evidence for? * Describe the case study
* Freud’s evidence for existence of Oedipus complex * 5-year-old boy, morbid fear of being bitten by a horse * Stemmed from incident, horse died in street * Freud’s interpretation, Hans fear represented castration * Freud suggested Hans transferred fear of father onto horses * Done via unconscious defence mechanism, displacement
60
Evaluation of Freud’s psychoanalytic theory
* The Oedipus complex (Rekers and Morey 1990) * Counterpoint (Bos and Sandfort 2010) * Female development (Karen Horney 1942) * Pseudoscientific (Popper 1959) * Nature of development (Freud and Kohlberg)
61
The Oedipus complex (Rekers and Morey 1990)
* Strength, support for role of Oedipus complex in gender development * Freud’s explanation means “normal” development for boys relies on having at least one male parent * Rekers and Morey (1990), rated gender identity of 49 boys (age 3-11), based on interview with families and children * Those judged as “gender disturbed”, 75% had no bio father or sub father living with them * Suggests being raised with no father has negative impact upon gender identity, in line with Freud
62
Counterpoint (Bos and Sandfort 2010)
* Generally, relationship between absent fathers, problems gender identity not supported * Bos and Sandfort (2010), compared data 63 children of lesbians, 68 children hetero families * Children raised by lesbians, less pressure to conform to gender stereotypes, less likely to assume own gender is superior, no difference in psychosocial adjustment or gender identity * Contradicts Freud, suggests fathers not necessary for healthy gender identity development
63
Female development (Karen Horney 1942)
* Limitation, inadequate account of women’s development * Jung (Freud’s contemporary) theorised on girls’ development; Freud focused heavily on Oedipus complex * Freud lived in androcentric Victorian era; men held power * Karen Horney (1942), argued more powerful emotion than penis envy, men’s “womb envy” * This is a reaction to women’s ability to nurture and sustain life * Horney argued penis envy and womb envy, result of cultural not bio factors * Challenges idea that women’s gender development founded on desire to want to be like a man (androcentric bias)
64
Pseudoscientific (Popper 1959)
* Limitation, explanation lacks scientific credibility * Freud criticised, used subjective case studies, his concepts untestable (unconscious) * Contrasts with other explanations, based on objective, verifiable evidence from lab studies * According to Popper (1959), makes Freud’s theory pseudoscientific (not genuine science) * Ideas cannot be falsified, questions validity of theory, not based on scientific evidence
65
Nature of development (Freud and Kohlberg)
* Freud argued children do not begin to show gender appropriate behaviour till after age 6 * Somewhat agrees with Kohlberg, suggested children act in gender appropriate way after gender constancy (age 6) * However, Kohlberg suggests concept that gender gradually develops * Freud in contrast states gender is acquired in one fell swoop, all at once, no build up * Freud’s view clearly overly simplistic, unlikely that a complex concept like gender arrives “second-hand” and at once as suggested by Freud
66
Social Learning Theory explanation of gender development * What does SLT state? * What does this pay attention to?
* SLT acknowledges role that social context plays in development, states all behv (including gender related) learned from observing others * Attention to influence of enviro (nurture) in shaping gender development * Includes significant others (parent peer teacher), wider influence of culture and the media
67
Direct reinforcement * What is direct reinforcement in relation to gender? * Give examples * How do children learn their gender identity? * When are children more likely to repeat a behaviour?
* Children more likely to be reinforced (praised), when demonstrating behv that is stereo gender appropriate * Boys encourage to be active, girls rewarded for being passive and gentle * The way they are encouraged to show distinct gender-appropriate behv is called differential reinforcement * Differential reinforcement, child learns their gender identity (I am boy) * Child more likely to repeat behv that is reinforced (rewarded), may be direct or indirect
68
Indirect (vicarious) reinforcement * What is vicarious reinforcement in relation to gender? * Give examples
* Consequences of other persons behv favourable, more likely to be imitated by child * Little girl sees mom get compliment when wearing make-up, she tries to repeat this behv * Consequences are unfavourable, less likely to be imitated * Boy sees another boy get teased for displaying feminine behv, behv unlikely to be copied
69
Identification and modelling * What is identification in relation to gender? * What is a role model, where are role models found? * What do role models tend to be like? * What is modelling? * Give an example of this
* Identification, child attaches themselves to person “like me”, “I want to be” * Person has qualities child sees as desirable, known as role models * Could be present in immediate enviro (teacher, parent etc), or present within the media (footballer) * Role models tend to be attractive, have high status, same gender as child * Modelling, precise demonstration of behv that may be imitated by observer * Mother may model stereo fem behv when tidying house, prepare dinner * Little girl copies this, modelling the behv she witnessed
70
Mediational processes * What is mediational processes * What are the mediational processes? * Give examples for each
* Cog processes that are central to learning of gender behaviour * Attention, boy wants to emulate footballer, close attention to what footballer does * Retention, remembers skills of footballer, tries reproduce this on playground * Motivation, Desire to repeat, want to be like “his hero” (identification) * Motor reproduction, boy must be physically capable of doing so
71
Evaluation for SLT explanation of gender development
* Research support (Smith and Llyod 1978) * Counterpoint * No developmental sequence * Cultural changes * Identification
72
Research support (Smith and Llyod 1978)
* Strength, key principles of SLT supported by evidence * Smith and Llyod (1978), babies (4-6 months, irrespective of actual sex), dressed half time boy clothes other half girls’ clothes * When observed interacting with adults, “boys” more likely given hammer rattle, encourage to be adventurous and active * “Girls” more likely given cuddly doll, told they are “pretty”, reinforced for being passive * Suggests gender appropriate behv stamped in at early age, through differential reinforcement, support SLT
73
Counterpoint
* Differential reinforcement, may not be cause of gender differences * Adults may be responding to innate gender differences, already there * Boy encouraged to be more active, consequence of the fact they are naturally more active anyway, hormonal differences * Suggests SLT only part of explanation of how children acquire gender-related behaviour
74
No developmental sequence
* Limitation, does not provide adequate explanation of how learning processes change with age * General implication of SLT, modelling of gender-appropriate behv can occur at any age (birth onwards) * Illogical, 2-year-old learn same way as 9-year-old * Suggests influence of age and maturation on learning gender concepts, not factor considered by SLT
75
Cultural changes
* Strength, SLT can explain cultural changes in stereo gender appropriate behaviour * Less of clear-cut distinction between masculine and feminine today compared to before * No corresponding change in basic biology of people within same period * Shift may be better explained by SLT than a bio approach * Shift in social expectation, cultural norms, new forms of gender behv unlikely to be punished, may be reinforced * Shows SLT can explain cultural changes in gender behv
76
Cultural changes
* Strength, SLT can explain cultural changes in stereo gender appropriate behaviour * Less of clear-cut distinction between masculine and feminine today compared to before * No corresponding change in basic biology of people within same period * Shift may be better explained by SLT than a bio approach * Shift in social expectation, cultural norms, new forms of gender behv unlikely to be punished, may be reinforced * Shows SLT can explain cultural changes in gender behv
77
Identification
* Freud, same gender parent necessary for child to gain “second hand” gender identity * SLT, multiple gender-appropriate role models alongside same gender parent * Same gender parent important, not “be all end all” in terms of influence * Absence of same gender parent, child model gender appropriate behv elsewhere * Many same gender role models within environment or media * Suggest key people might be a key influence but not the sole influence
78
Influence of Culture and Media on Gender roles
Look into how Culture and Media both affect gender roles
79
Culture and Gender roles * What is cross-cultural research, what is this useful for? * What can we conclude if a gender role behaviour is consistent across different cultures? * What can we conclude if a gender role behaviour is specific to a particular culture?
* Cross-cultural research valuable contribution to nature-nurture debate in Gender * If particular gender-role behv consistent across different cultures, may conclude this represents an innate bio difference between males and females * If some gender-role behv culturally specific, assume influence of shared norms and socialisation is decisive
80
Cultural differences (Mead 1935) (Nurture) * Discuss Mead’s (1935) research in Papua New Guinea * What did she conclude? * What does Mead admit in her later work? * What does Mead argue in her later work?
* Cross-cultural studies conducted in Papua New Guinea by Mead (1935) * Arapesh gentle and responsive (similar to stereotype of F in industrialised societies) * Mundugumor aggressive and hostile (similar to stereotype of M in industrialised societies) * Tchambuli women dominant, organised village, men passive considered “decorative” (reverse stereotype in industrialised societies) * Suggests may not be direct bio relationship between sex and gender, gender roles may be culturally determined * Later work, Mead admitted she underestimated universal nature of gender typical behv * She argued extent innate behv expressed result of cultural norms
81
Cultural similarities (Buss 1995, Munroe and Munroe 1975) (Nature) * What did Buss (1995) find? * What did Munroe and Munroe (1975) find?
* Buss (1995) found consistent patterns in mate preference (gender-role behv) in 37 countries across all continents * All cultures, women wanted men with wealth/resources men wanted physically attractive young women * Munroe and Munroe (1975), revealed in most societies, division of labour organised along gender lines * Men “breadwinners”, Women “nurturers”
82
Evaluation of Culture and Gender roles
* Research support (Hofstede 2001) * Mead’s Research (Freeman 1983) * Nature or Nurture
83
Research support (Hofstede 2001)
* Strength, influence of culture on changing gender roles supported by evidence * Hofstede (2001) argued industrialised cultures changing status and expectations of women have allowed increase of women in the workplace as opposed to usual domestics * In advanced industrialised societies, traditional stereotypes are being broken down * Traditional societies, women still “house-maker” as a result of social, cultural and religious pressures * Suggests gender roles determined by cultural context
84
Mead’s Research (Freeman 1983)
* Limitation, Mead’s research criticised * Mead accused of making generalisations based on short period of study * Freeman (1983), follow up study of people of Papua New Guinea after Mead investigation * Argues Meads findings flawed, Mead misled by some ppts, Mead preconceptions of what she would find influenced reading of events (Observer bias, Investigator bias, Ethnocentrism, Imposed etic) * Suggests Mead’s interpretations may not be objective, questions conclusions she drew
85
Nature or Nurture
* Some elements of gender role behv appear to be universal, others culturally specific * Suggest gender best seen as an interaction of nature and nurture (Interactionist approach)
86
Media and Gender roles * What does the media provide to children?
Media provides role models, children may identify, want to imitate them, it also provides rigid stereotypes as well as self-efficacy.
87
Rigid Stereotypes (Bussey and Bandura 1999, Furnham and Farragher 2000) * What did Bussey and Bandura (1999) find where depictions in media? * What did Furnham and Farragher (2000) find? * What does this suggest about medias role in gender?
* Evidence that media provides clear and rigid gender stereotypes * Bussey and Bandura (1999) found the following depictions in media * Men are independent, ambitious and “advice givers” * Women are dependent, unambitious and “advice seekers” * Furnham and Farragher (2000), men more likely shown in professional context, women shown in domestic settings * Suggests media may play a role in reinforcing social stereotypes concerning gender-appropriate behaviour
88
Self-efficacy (Mitra et al 2019) * What does the media give to people? * What increases a child’s beliefs of what behaviours are appropriate? * Describe Mitra et al’s (2019) study * What does this suggest about self-efficacy?
* Media gives info to men and women about likely success or otherwise of adopting behaviours * Seeing others perform gender-appropriate behaviours increases child’s beliefs, they are capable doing behaviours in future (self-efficacy) * Mitra et al 2019 study that analysed attitudes of people in India who watched programme designed to challenge deep-rooted gender stereotypes * Detective drama, ran 78 episodes, girls who watched more likely to see themselves as capable to work outside home than non-viewers * Suggests self-efficacy changed as a result of media influence
89
Evaluation of Media and Gender roles
* Cultivation Theory (Bond and Drogos 2014) * Child does not blindly consume media implications (Durkin 1985) * Counter stereotypes (Pingree 1978)
90
Cultivation Theory (Bond and Drogos 2014)
* Strength of research, has theoretical basis * Theory argues more time individual spends online/media; more likely they believe this reflects into social reality * Bond and Drogos (2014), found +ve correlation between time watching reality TV and permissive attitudes towards casual sex * Effect still true when researchers-controlled influence of factors such as existing sexual attitudes, parental attitudes and religious beliefs * Suggests media “cultivates” perception of reality, affects gender behv
91
Child does not blindly consume media implications (Durkin 1985)
* Limitation, may not be a causal relationship (media influence does not cause gender norms in child) * Durkin (1985), argues young children are not passive and uncritical recipients of media messages * Norms in family bigger determinant on gender attitudes and behv * If media confirms existing gender norms held by family, reinforces these norms in child’s mind * If it claims the opposite or something else, likely to be ignored or rejected “Can’t be” * Suggests media influence secondary influence to other influences such as family
92
Counter stereotypes (Pingree 1978)
* Evidence media can have positive role in changing gender-role stereotypes through counter-stereotypes * Present people in gender-inappropriate ways (Disney’s Brave), break down cultural norms * May be successful, “present new normal” and increase self-efficacy of children * Pingree (1978), found gender stereotyping reduced in school children (3rd Grade) when shown adverts of women in non-stereotypical role * Success dependent on nature of audience, boys in 8th grade, stereotypes stronger * Boys wanted to maintain their viewpoint, could be because they wanted to show rebellion or non-conformity in front of peers * Suggests success dependent on who is receiving the message * Rejection or success heavily dependent on induvial differences of audience * Counter-stereotypes must therefore be carefully considered, take account of those who are watching
93
Atypical Gender Development * What is atypical gender development?
This is an abnormality in gender development which can cause gender dysphoria.
94
Gender Dysphoria * What is gender dysphoria? * What is this recognised as in DSM-5?
* Some people experience mismatch, bio sex at birth and gender identity * Gender dysphoria, people that don’t identify with sex given at birth * Gender dysphoria is a source of stress and discomfort * Recognised as a psych disorder in DSM-5
95
Biological Explanations for Gender Dysphoria * What are the two biological explanations for gender dysphoria?
* The two biological explanations for gender dysphoria are brain sex theory and genetic factors * Intersex conditions excluded from categorisation of gender dysphoria
96
Brain Sex Theory (Kruijver et al 2000, Zhou et al 1995) * Describe Kruijver et al’s (2000) study * Describe Zhou et al’s (1995) research * What does this suggest about gender dysphoria?
* Suggests gender dysphoria has basis in brain structure (the bed nucleus of the stria terminals (BST)) * Structure involved in emotional responses, larger in men than women, found that transgender females have female sized structure (Kruijver et al 2000) * Suggests people with gender dysphoria have BST size of gender they identify with not bio sex * Fits with reports of trans people who feel they are born wrong sex at early age (Zhou et al 1995) * Follow up study, 6 trans people showed average BST neuron number in female range (Kruijver et al 2000)
97
Genetic Factors (Coolidge et al 2002. Heylens et al 2012) * Describe Coolidge et al’s (2002) study * Describe Heylens et al’s (2012) study * What is concordance rate in this context? * What does this suggest about gender dysphoria?
* Coolidge et al (2002), 157 twin pairs (96 MZ, 61 DZ) assessed for GD * Found 2.3% of the sample demonstrated atypical gender development, * 62% of the variance could be explained by genetic factors, suggests strong heritable component to GD * Heylens et al (2012) 23 MZ compared with 21 DZ, one of each pair diagnosed with GD * Nine (39%) MZ twins concordant for GD, none of DZ concordant for GD * Indicates role of genetic factors in development of GD * Concordance refers to the probability of one twin having disorder given the other has it as a percentage
98
Evaluation for Biological Explanations for Gender Dysphoria
* Contradictory evidence (Hulshoff Pot et al 2006) * Other brain differences (Rametti et al 2011) * Socially sensitive research
99
Contradictory evidence (Hulshoff Pot et al 2006)
* Limitation, brain sex theory central claims challenged * Hulshoff Pot et al (2006), studied trans ppl with MRI scans taken during hormone treatment * Showed size of BST changed significantly during hormone treatment * Kruijver et al and Zhou et al examined people post mortem and after receiving hormone treatment * Suggests difference in BST may be effect of hormone therapy not cause of GD
100
Other brain differences (Rametti et al 2011)
* Strength, may be other differences associated with GD * Rametti et al (2011) studied white matter, regional differences in proportion of this in male and female brains * Analysed trans M and F before hormone treatment, found amount and distribution of white matter corresponded more closely to gender they identified with rather than biological sex * Suggests there are early differences in brains of transgender individuals
101
Socially sensitive research
* For some knowing there is a bio basis to GD may be a relief, removes responsibility from person when it is a medical category requiring treatment * They may be less likely to assume the way they feel is “their fault” * Others object to labelling GD as a mental disorder, risks stigmatising those subject to GD as ill or sick rather than just “different”, ppl may become subjects to prejudice or discrimination due to label * Suggests research in GD may shaped how society views the label, how ppl may be viewed with this label * Researchers therefore should avoid reinforcing damaging stereotypes were possible
102
Social Explanations for Gender Dysphoria * What are the two social explanations for gender dysphoria?
The two social explanations for GD are social constructionism and psychanalytic theory.
103
Social constructionism (McClintock 2015) * What does this perspective argue? * What is gender dysphoria classified as under this? * What did McClintock (2015) investigate and find? * What does this suggest about gender dysphoria?
* This perspective argues gender identity does not reflect underlying bio differences between people, instead, these concepts “invented” by societies * The gender “confusion” individuals with GD face caused by societies forcing people to be man or woman, pick side act accordingly * GD not a pathological condition according to this perspective, it’s a social phenomenon caused by people needing to pick a particular path (man or woman) * McClintock (2015), investigated genetic condition in the Sambia of New Guinea * Some bio males categorized as girls at birth, they have a labia and clitoris * Puberty, genitals change due to increase of testosterone, testes descend, clit become penis * Common in Sambia, accepted that some people men, some women and others females-then-males * When culture had contact with other cultures, F-T-M judged as pathological form of GD
104
Psychoanalytic Theory (Ovesey and Person 1973, Stoller 1973) * What did Ovesey and Person (1973) emphasise? * Describe the psychoanalytic theory * What did Stoller (1973) investigate and find? * What does this suggest about gender dysphoria?
* Ovesey and Person (1973) emphasise social relationships in family as cause of GD * GD in bio males caused by boy experiencing extreme separation anxiety pre phallic stage (before gender identity established) * Boy fantasises of symbiotic fusion with mother to relieve anxiety, danger separation removed * Boy “becomes” mother, adopts woman gender identity * Stoller (1973), interviews with GD bio males, had overly close relationships with mothers * Suggests strong female identification thus conflicted gender identity in long term
105
Evaluation for the Social Explanations for Gender Dysphoria
* Social constructionism * Psychanalytic Theory (Rekers 1986) * Different Outcomes (Drummond et al 2008)
106
Social constructionism
* Strength, not all cultures have two genders, fa’afafine of Samoa recognise more than two genders * Challenges traditional classifications of male and female * Suggests cultural understanding beginning to “catch up” with lived experience of many * Suggests gender identity and dysphoria best seen as social construction rather than biological fact
107
Psychanalytic Theory (Rekers 1986)
* Limitation, issues with psychoanalytic theory of GD * Does not provide account of GD in bio females, only applies to trans women * Rekers (1986), GD in bio men more likely associated with absence of father rather than fear of separation from mother * Suggests psychoanalytic theory does not provided compressive account of GD, incomplete
108
Different Outcomes (Drummond et al 2008)
* Some who experience GD will decide to have gender reassignment surgery in the future * However, proportion of people who experience early dysphoric feelings in childhood do not do so as adults * Drummond et al (2008), 25 girls with GD, only 12% (3/25) had GD in follow up at ages of 24 * Suggests surgery before age of consent must be carefully managed with appropriate support and safeguards * Many uncomfortable with idea that child receives hormone treatment that may cause permanent changes in their physicality’s * However, some early medical intervention may be the only way to prevent depression and possible suicide in extreme cases