global crime Flashcards
(35 cards)
transnational crime
any crime that crosses national borders
transnational organised crime
when criminal organisations in different countries form business networks to commit international crimes together for mutual benefit - profit
transnational organised crime e.g arms trafficking
illegal supply of weapons to criminal organisations that aren’t supposed to have weapons e.g guerrilla groups - groups in a country opposed to the gov and aim to use violence to overthrow the gov. Sierra Leone - civil war caused by guerrilla group that wanted to overthrow gov who went into villages and forced men and boys to join their illegal army - child soldiers, women and girls were raped and murdered. boys and men forced to work in illegal diamond mines owned by the guerrilla group - slave labour. diamonds sourced from illegal diamond mines - blood diamonds. guerrilla group exchange diamonds to Russians for weapons, Russians create fake certificates for diamonds and sell them in Europe
transnational organised crime people trafficking
illegal transportation of people from country to country for: illegal work, women and children forced into prostitution, sex tourism, trafficking of human organs. Illegal immigrants - smuggling people from LEDC to MEDC and forcing them to work for a low wage - 21st century slaves
trafficiking of endangered species
Poachers kill baby animal’s parents to capture baby animals and sell them abroad as exotic pets’ or kill and sell elephant tusks or ivory . In MEDC there is demand for illegal goods and services, supply for these are coming from LEDCs.
global causes of crime - Taylor
Taylor’s theory explains how globalisation has increased crime and created new patterns of crime but if his theory was correct, all poor people would be criminal but they aren’t.
- globalisation means free market economy has developed on a global scale so production of goods isn’t in its og source as workers are cheaper in poorer countries. This increases w/c and m/c crime - w/c become unemployed as factories relocated in other countries, global free market economy means elite commit WCC and corporate crime such as insider trading and tax evasion.
criticism - fails to explain why only some people turn to crime when majority are still law abiding
global cause of crime- Hobbs and Dunningham
glocal crime - globalisation changed way in which crime is organised - crime has now become glocal. In the past crimes were local and criminal organisations were hierarchal but globalisation has changed how crime is organised so now they’re between loose knit non hierarchical criminal groups from different countries.
criticism - ignore the fact that there are still criminal groups that operate on a local level
environmental or green crime
any illegal activity that damages the environment.
3 groups who commit environmental crime
individuals - dumping of waste, littering, picking protected wild flowers, fox hunting.
businesses - pollution and dumping of waste. The tightening of regulations on the disposal of toxic waste has generated a profitable trade in the global illegal disposal of hazardous waste.
Government- pollution and transport and dumping of waste material. This in particular refers to disposal of nuclear waste from nuclear power plants.
traditional criminology
Situ and Emmons
concerned with environmental crimes as defined by national and international laws and regulations concerning the environment
define environmental crimes as acts that violate the law
criticism: accepting the official definitions of
environmental crime which are often created by the powerful groups in society in their own interest.
green criminology
sociologists should consider any behaviour that harms environment as a green crime even if it’s legal - takes ecocentric view - belief that humans don’t have the right to damage the environment for our own benefit
anthropocentric views - if it’s benefiting humans its okay to damage the environment
criticism - - definition of green crime is too broad so theory is too idealistic theory is too theoretical so doesn’t offer any real practical solutions to problem of green crime
primary environmental crimes
currently seen as environmental issues rather than crimes and are legal under international law. They result directly from the destruction and degradation of the earth’s resources and include water and air pollution, deforestation.
3 types of primary crime
crimes of air pollution - burning fossil fuels from industry and transport adds 3 billion tons of carbon the atmosphere annually. The potential criminals are corporations, businesses and individuals.
Crimes of deforestation - e.g in the Amazon, forests were cleared to rear beef cattle. The criminals here are govs and corporation.
Crimes of species decline and animal rights - 50 species a day are becoming extinct, there is trafficking of animals and their body parts. Criminals are organised gangs, individuals, govs and corporations.
3 types of secondary environmental crime
State violence against oppositional groups - French government’s secret agents blew up a Greenpeace ship in New Zealand as the shop was there protesting against French nuclear weapons testing in the Pacific ocean.
Hazardous waste and organised crime - safe and legal disposal of toxic waste is highly expensive so many companies seek to dispose of it legally
Environmental discrimination - poorer groups are worst affected by pollution.
State crime
any illegal activity committed by government departments.
examples of state crimes
war crimes- deliberate targeting of civilians by states in times of war, torture, inhumane treatment of prisoners etc.
torture - e.g waterboarding - UK and USA using extraordinary rendition in Iraq war - taking prisoners from country where torture is banned to where it’s allowed
genocide - violent crimes committed against national, ethnic or religious groups, also referred to as ethnic cleansing. e.g - holocaust of 6 million Jews and other groups
green and ward -state crime
state crime is one of the most serious forms of crime because of the:
scale of state crime - how widespread crimes committed by gov agencies are state is source of the law - state itself is source of the law so state can legalise criminal actions it has performed
national sovereignty - state has supreme authority within its borders, making it difficult for international organisations such as UN to intervene despite existence of national conventions against such acts
as UN to intervene despite existence of national conventions against such acts
domestic law definition of state crime
chambliss - state crime is any act defined by law as criminal and committed by state officials in pursuit of their jobs as representatives of the state
criticism - ignores fact that state has power to avoid criminalising its own actions and they can pass laws allowing them to carry out harmful acts, e.g - nazi Germany passed laws allowing it to forcefully sterilise disabled people
zemiology definition
michalowski - zemiology should be used as basis for defining state crimes as state crime should be any act committed by state that causes crime, regardless of whether it’s illegal or not
criticism - too vague
labelling and societal reaction definition
labelling theory - an act only becomes criminal when society defines it as criminal - state crime is socially constructed and depends on societal reaction to the act
criticism - labelling theory’s definition of state crime ignores fact that state has power to influence public opinion, e.g Nazi Germany used propaganda to turn public against Jewish people
international law definition
rothe and mullins - we should use international law to define state crime as any action by or on behalf of a state that breaks international laws, such as those made by the UN - ensures sociologists’ personal opinions don’t affect research into state crime
criticism - international laws are a social construct and powerful countries can influence the passing of international laws in their favour
the authoritarian personality
Adorno et al define it as the willingness to obey orders of superior without question. It’s often thought that people who commit acts of genocide are psychopaths.
State crimes
are crimes of obedience as they require obedience to higher authority and research shows many people are willing to obey authority even when it involves harming others as a result of the role they are socialised into. Green and Ward argue that in order to overcome the norms against the use of cruelty, those involved in torture have to be re-socialised, trained and exposed to propaganda about ‘the enemy’. To do this, state create enclaves of barbarism such as military bases. This prepares the torturer to regard torture as a 5-9 job from which they can return to normal life.
Modernity
Baumann argues that it is the features of modernity that cause genocide such as the Holocaust
1. Division of labour - each person was responsible for small task so no one felt responsible for the atrocity. 2. Science and technology - trains used to transport people to concentration camps, the gas used to kill them.