Global Politics Flashcards
(116 cards)
Define global governance
and security dilemma
- Global governance; states have the most authority in global politics + represent their own national interests. Dalton used the Billiard Ball Model to show how states impact the other but precedence’s over IGOs
- Security dilemma; as one states defences build up others respond increasing tensions between the two states. China’s expansion into territorial waters in South China sea has led to the US patrolling nearby ‘international’ waters
Define anarchical society and international anarchy
- Anarchical society; attempts to bring government structures together to deal with common interests. E.g. Taking military action through a UNSC Resolution
- International Anarchy; states are self-contained units which frequently clash where there is no authority as as legitimate or powerful as the nation-state. US-led + UK-backed invasion of Iraq shows the disorder of global politics without a clear UNSC Resolution
Explain how nation states have primacy over the EU and UN
- EU; 2016 Brexit vote meant the UK was the first member to leave the EU giving them a weaker global presence + links to the US. Members like Hungary are deeply critical + more Euroscptic parties are being elected across the EU
- UN; every member state (193) has one vote - for the Security Council, Economic + Social Council + budgetary decisions require a 2/3 majority but other votes only need a majority. Members often also abstain meaning no action can be taken e.g UK on Palestine
Explain how nation-states have primacy over the G7 and Paris Climate Change Conference
- G7; G7 has no formal rules which means control over members which ensures like-minded values + achieves more than organisations like the G20 e.g. US $50 billion loan to Ukraine agreed recently
- Paris Climate Change Conference; 157 parties have committed to greenhouse gas emissions reduction but only 57 have quantified such targets into domestic policies + only 17 (+EU) look beyond targets for 2030
Example of multipolarity causing global instability
Competition In The Arctic - Example Of A Multipolar World Order Leading To Greater Global Instability:
- In 2025, the Arctic has become a key point of geopolitical competition (especially the U.S. and Russia), due to the potential for a new sea lane that reduced the travel time for goods between Europe and Asia, as well as due to the potential for key natural resource reserves/minerals in the Arctic
- Russia has increased its military presence in the Arctic, including by launching a nuclear-powered submarine in the area
- Trump has spoken both of acquiring Greenland by force
Example of the shift away from unipolairty
Expansion Of The BRICs in 2024 and 2025
- In 2024 and 2025, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates joining in 2024, and Indonesia becoming the first Southeast Asian nation to become a member in 2025
- Growing challenge to Western-dominated institutions with countries more willing to align themselves with Russia and China who are dominant in the group
- BRICs group has coordinated a number of policies that challenged U.S. hegemony, including
1. Move away from dependence on the dollar
2. Cooperation on artificial intelligence
3. Creating ‘BRICS Pay’; a system to allow financial transactions without having to rely on Western banks
Define unipolarity and mulitpolarity with the advantages and disadvantages of both
-
Unipolarity; a distribution of power in which one state eexercises most of the influence
e.g rise of US hegemony
Adavantages: US provided a sense world peace - spread ideas of free trade + democracy
Disadvantages: Highly unstable emerging states resent the one hegemonic state
-
Multipolarity; more than two-states have nearly equal amounts of influence
e.g increase in power of BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India +China)
Advantages: Liberals argue the lack of existance of a single world power means states are more likely to cooperate with global goverance
Disadvantages: Neorealists argue that chance of misjuding the intentions of other states + increases the chances of war due to external balancing
Define bipolarity and balance of power with the advantages and disadvantages of both
-
Bipolarity; a system where world order in which the majority of global economic, military + cultural influence is held between two states
e.g Cold War- US + USSR vying for power
Advantages: promote peace as neither side was capable of eliminating the other
Disadvantages: Destabling + dangerous as it almost led to the possibility of MAD
-
Balance of power; national security is enhanced when militant capability is distributed so that no one state is strong enough to dominate the other
e.g Nuclear proliferation + fear of MAD led to uneasy balances of power
Advantages: countries increase their own defence systems (Realist POV)
Disadvantages: Mearsheimer argues it’s an unstable distribution of power as it’s constantly shifting
Explain the key beliefs/theories of realism
- Structural realism = nation-states seek to advance their own interests at the expanse of other nation states
- Nation-states don’t allow supranational authority greater than themselves as global relations are archaic are as no ‘body’ enforces international law
- States shouldn’t have to meet humanitarian aims - destablises international relations
- Negative interpretations of human nature views humans as selfish + egotistical
- e.g Trans-Pacific Partnership (IGO) was unable to exist which aimed to lower tarrifs didn’t exist due to US withdrawal in 2017
- e.g EU raised import taxes on Britain after the left the IGO
Explain the practical policies of liberalism
- Human nature isn’t fixed so states can improve
- Efforts should be made to prevent + reduce conflicts which are avoidable through IGOs e.g UN
- Military powers can be counterproductive
- States should be committed to individual liberty e.g human rights
- Power should be shared equally as it leads to stability through things like economic cooperation reducing chances of conflict
- Possible to impose order on humans in a rule-based system of international law e.g 2012 EU won Nobel Peace Prize
Explain the views of Waltz, Bull, Morgenthau and Mearsheimer - realist thinkers
Waltz - favours bipolarity over multipolarity as it lead to easier negotiations + that states live in a self help system where they build up their own security apparatus through military power
Bull - identified anarchical society in global politics + a society of states emerged to promote common interests + states compete with the other
Morgenthau - argues people are selfish + try to dominate so moral considerations are less important than national interests + states defend their own national intests against perceived threats
Mearsheimer - explained that conflict + competition for power continues + secure hegemony + all states find ways to increase power
Explain the relationship between IGOs and states
- IGOs only exist because they have been created by states who retain the ultimate power e.g Britain leaving the EU, African states leaving the ICC in protest at bias against them
- Failure of UNSC to agree to a resolution on Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire due to US vetos shows IGOs are dependant on member states
- States retain the power to act unilaterally e.g UK air strikes on the Houthis - isolationism
Explain Russia’s position with NATO and events which have strained the relationship
- Russia supported Assad’s regime in Syria with air strike in 2015
- Russia began to increase its military influences in response to the expansion of NATO e.g annexation of Crimea in 2014
- Russian National Security Strategy declared that NATOs build up forces in countries bordering it which wasn’t consistent in international law
- Trump called for all NATO member states to pay the fair share of contribution - 2% of GDP + called NATO ‘obsolete’
Explain the realist theory; Billard Ball Model
- Billard Ball Model is under pressure due to complex interdependance of interconnected states
- Push factors seperate nation-states such as scare resources, war
- Pull factors bring sovereign states together such as trade agreements
- Every billard ball is sovereign so protected from IGOs
Explain an example of global anarchy between states
- In the South China Sea (contains oil + gas) - China has attempted to expand its territorial waters by increasing patrols + building islands
- US has responded through Freedom of Navigation Patrols in ‘international waters’ - in 2013 the UN tribunal ruled that China wasn’t complying with the UN Convention on the Laws of the Sea
Explain the views of Keohane, Fukuyama and Ohmae - liberal thinkers
Keohane - challenges ideas that states reject international cooperation + that international law can achieve shared solutions. Democracy plays a key role in preventing conflict+ international trade binds states together as they are more interdependant
Fukuyama - liberal democracy since the end of the Cold War have become the undisputed form of human government + argues its the ‘endpoint of mankind’s ideological development’. International law is possible to hold all states to account e.g Universal Declaration of Human Rights + reject the zero-sum game
Ohmae - globalisation brought a shift in society + states are losing their economic power + aren’t the main participants in the global economy. NGOs + IGOs help states become aware of different viewpoints + policies
Explain key examples of liberal beliefs on IGOs and how they restrict conflict
- WTO has fostered trade through greater transparency among trading nations + an increase in developed countries investing in developing economies
- Political decisions are more globalised e.g Ebola crisis 2015 + Cornovirus pandemic 2020 - Interpol faciliating international police co-operation + Paris Climate Agreemet to tackle climate change
- Turkey has been denied membership to the EU because they fail to meet the requirments - democratic states offer a more stable base to society as they offer a framework for trade, transparency etc
- Democracy restricts conflicts as leaders are responsible to their electorates + people feel unpopular about war + often need permission from their legislature to engage in military action e.g 2013 when Parliament voted military action against Assad’s regime in Syria
Give examples of Obama’s liberalist policies/actions
- Ended wars in Iraq + Afghanistan without a decisive victory
- US air strikes in Libya to prevent humanitarian crisis when Gaddafi threatened to kill rebel civillians with UNSC approval + Arab League support
- Struck a deal with Iran lifting economic sanctions in exchange for them stopping their nuclear weapon buildings programme
- During the 2010-12 Arab Uprisings they sided with the protestors which was a turn from previous US leaders who were allies of Mubarak in Egypt
Give examples of Obama’s realist policies/actions
- Obama increased the use of drone strikes over boots on the ground for al-Qaeda targets which were highly effective (between Pakestian + Afghanistan)
2.Failed to react with military intervention when Assad used chemical weapons in Syria - struck a deal with Russia to disarm Assad of chemical weapons
- Obama failed to close the terrorist detention centre at Guantanamo Bay where terrorists are often tortured + held without trial
- Obama didn’t uphold international law when Russia annexed Crimea in 2014
Explain Fukuyama’s key arguments on the Clash of Civilisation and criticisms of them
- Collapse of the USSR is proof that liberal democracies will become dominat
- Fukuyama argues that liberal democracy will lead to global stability due to the mutal interdependance of states with shared values
- National and ethnic conflicts will still occur but large scale ideological war will cease to exist
Critictisms
* Fukuyama claimed that liberal democracies had ended the class problems which have now been expanded by the growing class divide - leading to more people interested in socialism
* Far-right (anti-state) parties are rising across Europe and people are becoming more nihilistic leading to a potential for facism to restart
Explain the work of Amnesty International, Greenpeace and Oxfam and use examples
- Amnesty International
* Influenced the EU to provide €30 million to the EU Human Rights Defenders Mechanism
* Influenced US states Illinois + Michigan to enforce new gun safety laws e.g universal background checks - Greenpeace
* Worked with the UN to implement the Global Ocean Treaty - Oxfam
* Use funding to help provide essential items, rebuild infrastructure and protect women + girls who are the most vunerable in the aftermath of the severe flooding in Bangladesh 2024
Explain how the internet and technology has impacted globalisation
- Instantaneous trading of shares + capital has created a global marketplace
- TNCs have spread e.g McDonalds have franchies in 120 countries
- News networks have become global corporations e.g CNN, Sky News + social media has led to the spread of information e.g in the 2012 Arab Uprisings Al Jazeera played a role in provking the riots by undermining states abilities to control the flow of info the their people + in Bangladesh in 2024 they cut off Meta servies to stop people being able to coordinate riots
Explain internal sovereignty and give examples of it within the UK
Internal; location of sovereignty within a state
- In the UK Westminster Parliament possesses legislative sovereignty
- The EU referendum suggests that popular sovereignty is more important than legislative sovereignty within the UK as Parliament was unprepared to ignore the vote
- The Brexit will change the location of sovereignty within the UK
- The PM exercises sovereignty on behlaf of the monarchy through using royal prerogative
- Sovereignty is fluid e.g Supreme Court’s ruiling that Parliament and not the government had the sovereign authority to trigger Article 50
Give statistics showing the convergence between the global North and South
- An annual growth in the economy of developing countries 7.6%(rich countries had an annual growth of 4.5%)
- Global trade increasing from 2024, global trade reached a record $33 trillion, marking a 3.7% increase from the previous year
- 2000: Approximately $41 trillion, 2014: $78 trillion
- Growth was primarily driven by a 9% rise in services trade, contributing $700 billion, while goods trade grew by 2%, adding $500 billion
- By 2030 - 7.3% of the global population) are expected to live in extreme poverty -slower pace of poverty reduction
- Approximately 8.5% of the global population, live in extreme poverty - decrease from 38% in 1990