Globalisation Flashcards
(33 cards)
international trade?
exchange of g&s betw countries involving the use of diff currencies and crossing intl borders
absolute advantage?
a country is said to have comparative advantage over another country in the production of a good if it can produce = amt of o/p using ↓ resources or it can prod ↑ units of o/p using = amt of resources
comparative advantage?
a country is said to have ca over another country in the pdtn of a good if it occurs ↓ opp costs in the pdtn of that good
steps for explaining CA? (eg betw US & Vietnam)
- before specialisation table (US with AA over Vietnam)
- opp cost (ratio)
- after specialisation table (US partial, V complete)
- terms of trade (px/pm)
- consumption of trade table (w both global goods pdtn ↑)
sources of CA?
- intl diff in factor endowments
- diff in tech
- dyn ca
sources of CA - intl diff in factor endowment?
diff in factor endowm ∵ intl mobility → diff in cost of fop → diff in cop → diff in p of g&s
source of CA - diff in tech?
diff in tech ∵ diff countries w diff stages of dev, diff extent of r&d, diff spd of absorption of new tech → diff in lbr pdty
source of CA - dyn CA?
dyn ca ∵ ca ∆
limitations of CA?
- high transp costs
- immob of fop within country
- ↑ opp cost
- trade & currency restictns (protectionism)
limitations of CA - high transp costs?
high transp costs → distort relative p → ∆ pattern of trade
(∵ transp costs add sig margin to p of a traded commodity, ↓ gains from specialisation & trade e.g. heavy weight have v high transp costs)
limitations of CA - immobility of fop within country?
immobility of fop within country (∵ ca assumes lbr can more freely in a country), but country may not be able to reallocate its lbr quickly & efficiently → diff to max benefits from specialisation & trade
limitations of CA - ↑ opp cost?
↑ opp cost ∵ have to use ↑ resources that are ↓ & ↓ suited to its pdtn, but are ↑ for other goods → disappearance/↓ of comp cost advl
limitations of CA - trade & currency restictns (protectionism)?
protectionism ∵ gain from specialisation & trade contingent on free trade → hinder world trade & ↓ gains from specialisation & trade
determinants of inter indus trade?
- diff sources of ca
- dd factors (e.g. pop & ȳ lvl)
- limitatns to ca
determinants of inter indus trade - diff sources of ca?
ca influences pot: export g&s which the country inccurs ↓ opp cost in producing & import g&s which the country inccurs ↑ opp cost in producing
determinants of inter indus trade - dd factors?
↑ affluence of trade par, ∆ t&p, pop size
explain with 3 graphs - exporting country, world, importing country
determinants of intra-indust trade?
- dd side factors
- eos from intra indus specialisatn
determinants of intra-indust trade - dd side factors?
customers value diff pdts & variety differently → willing to pay diff p for them
determinants of intra-indust trade - EOS from intra indus speciation?
exploit ↑ full ieos, horizontal intra indust trade ∵ combine the ↓ lr unit cop, but can still leads to comp for firms & variety for consumers
SG POT?
- small & open econ
- total trade 300% of gdp
- dep on x for growth ∵ small dom market
- dep on m for raw mat ∵ lack nat resources
- sg x&m dd low relative to world → price taker
micro benefits of int trade?
- ↑ consumer welfare
- ↑ firms profits
- ↑ soc welfare
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ cons welfare?
- ↑ consumption possibilities
- ↑ variety & ↑ qlty of g&s
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ cons welfare (↑ cons possibilities)?
based on ca theory, spec & trade → ↑ global efficiency → ↑ world pdtn → ↑ world consumption → indiv countries can consume beyond their ppc → ↑ mat welfare & ↑ cons surp (e.g. thru ↓ p & ↑ consumption lvl)
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ cons welfare (↑ variety & ↑ qlty of g&s)?
intl trade → expand market → ↑ consumer choice → ↑ consumer soverignty