Globalisation Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

international trade?

A

exchange of g&s betw countries involving the use of diff currencies and crossing intl borders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

absolute advantage?

A

a country is said to have comparative advantage over another country in the production of a good if it can produce = amt of o/p using ↓ resources or it can prod ↑ units of o/p using = amt of resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

comparative advantage?

A

a country is said to have ca over another country in the pdtn of a good if it occurs ↓ opp costs in the pdtn of that good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

steps for explaining CA? (eg betw US & Vietnam)

A
  1. before specialisation table (US with AA over Vietnam)
  2. opp cost (ratio)
  3. after specialisation table (US partial, V complete)
  4. terms of trade (px/pm)
  5. consumption of trade table (w both global goods pdtn ↑)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

sources of CA?

A
  1. intl diff in factor endowments
  2. diff in tech
  3. dyn ca
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

sources of CA - intl diff in factor endowment?

A

diff in factor endowm ∵ intl mobility → diff in cost of fop → diff in cop → diff in p of g&s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

source of CA - diff in tech?

A

diff in tech ∵ diff countries w diff stages of dev, diff extent of r&d, diff spd of absorption of new tech → diff in lbr pdty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

source of CA - dyn CA?

A

dyn ca ∵ ca ∆

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

limitations of CA?

A
  1. high transp costs
  2. immob of fop within country
  3. ↑ opp cost
  4. trade & currency restictns (protectionism)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

limitations of CA - high transp costs?

A

high transp costs → distort relative p → ∆ pattern of trade
(∵ transp costs add sig margin to p of a traded commodity, ↓ gains from specialisation & trade e.g. heavy weight have v high transp costs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

limitations of CA - immobility of fop within country?

A

immobility of fop within country (∵ ca assumes lbr can more freely in a country), but country may not be able to reallocate its lbr quickly & efficiently → diff to max benefits from specialisation & trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

limitations of CA - ↑ opp cost?

A

↑ opp cost ∵ have to use ↑ resources that are ↓ & ↓ suited to its pdtn, but are ↑ for other goods → disappearance/↓ of comp cost advl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

limitations of CA - trade & currency restictns (protectionism)?

A

protectionism ∵ gain from specialisation & trade contingent on free trade → hinder world trade & ↓ gains from specialisation & trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

determinants of inter indus trade?

A
  1. diff sources of ca
  2. dd factors (e.g. pop & ȳ lvl)
  3. limitatns to ca
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

determinants of inter indus trade - diff sources of ca?

A

ca influences pot: export g&s which the country inccurs ↓ opp cost in producing & import g&s which the country inccurs ↑ opp cost in producing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

determinants of inter indus trade - dd factors?

A

↑ affluence of trade par, ∆ t&p, pop size
explain with 3 graphs - exporting country, world, importing country

17
Q

determinants of intra-indust trade?

A
  1. dd side factors
  2. eos from intra indus specialisatn
18
Q

determinants of intra-indust trade - dd side factors?

A

customers value diff pdts & variety differently → willing to pay diff p for them

19
Q

determinants of intra-indust trade - EOS from intra indus speciation?

A

exploit ↑ full ieos, horizontal intra indust trade ∵ combine the ↓ lr unit cop, but can still leads to comp for firms & variety for consumers

20
Q

SG POT?

A
  1. small & open econ
  2. total trade 300% of gdp
  3. dep on x for growth ∵ small dom market
  4. dep on m for raw mat ∵ lack nat resources
  5. sg x&m dd low relative to world → price taker
21
Q

micro benefits of int trade?

A
  1. ↑ consumer welfare
  2. ↑ firms profits
  3. ↑ soc welfare
22
Q

micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ cons welfare?

A
  1. ↑ consumption possibilities
  2. ↑ variety & ↑ qlty of g&s
23
Q

micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ cons welfare (↑ cons possibilities)?

A

based on ca theory, spec & trade → ↑ global efficiency → ↑ world pdtn → ↑ world consumption → indiv countries can consume beyond their ppc → ↑ mat welfare & ↑ cons surp (e.g. thru ↓ p & ↑ consumption lvl)

24
Q

micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ cons welfare (↑ variety & ↑ qlty of g&s)?

A

intl trade → expand market → ↑ consumer choice → ↑ consumer soverignty

25
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ firms' π?
1. ↑ dd for firms 2. ↓ costs by exploiting available eos
26
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ firms' π (↑ dd for firms)?
trade → ↑ consumer base → ↑ total revenue & market share
27
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ firms' π (↓ costs by exploiting available eos)?
1. ieos 2. eeos 3. leading by doing
28
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ firms' π (↓ costs by exploiting available eos - ieos)?
↑ scale of pdtn → ieos → ↓ lrac of pdtn → ↑ firms' π → ↑ r&d
29
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ firms' π (↓ costs by exploiting available eos - eeos)?
cost per unit of o/p ↓ ∵ expansion of size of indus → ↓ pdtn costs
30
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ firms' π (↓ costs by exploiting available eos - learn by doing)?
by specialising → ↑ exp ∵ workers & managers ↑ eff → ↓ unit cop (esp in knowledge intensive & high-tech indus)
31
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ soc welfare?
1. exposure to foreign comp 2. trade creation
32
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ soc welfare (exposure to foreign comp)?
1. exposure to foreign indus → prevent complacency & ↓ bte ∵ face check in market power → ↓ p setting ability → ↑ alloc eff 2. exposure to foreign indus → ↑ efforts to find ↑ eff mthds → ↓ x-ineff & ↑ incentive to r&d (↑ pdt qlty via pdt innov, ↑ qlty via process innov in order to compete globally) → ↑ dyn eff
33
micro benefits of intl trade - ↑ soc welfare (↑trade creation)?
trade creation →