globalisation, green crime, human rights, and state crime Flashcards
(43 cards)
Held et al
there has been an increasing interconnectedness of crime across national borders
supply and demand
the global crime economy has a ‘supply side’ (drugs, sex workers, and goods) and a ‘demand side’ (rich West)
supply is linked to globalisation - drug-producing companies like Peru can make money from trade
Taylor
globalisation has led to changes in the pattern and extent of crime - creating more inequality and increasing crime
globalisation, capitalism, and crime
- transnational companies can manufacture in developing countries, creating job insecurity and poverty
- social cohesion is undermined by marketisation, which causes people to see themselves as individual consumers who calculate the costs/benefits of each action
- a lack of legitimate jobs drives the unemployed to look for illegal opportunities, like the lucrative drugs trade
AO3 of Taylor
doesn’t explain how inequality leads to crime as not every poor person does
Castells
there’s a global criminal economy worth £1trillion a year that takes several forms
- arms trafficking
- trafficking nuclear materials
- smuggling illegal immigrants
- trafficking women and children for prostitution
- sex tourism
- trafficking body parts
- cyber crimes
- green crimes
- international tourism
- smuggling of legal goods to avoid tax
- trafficking artefacts/endangered species
- the drugs trade
- money laundering
global risk consciousness
risk is seen as global, not tied to certain places
EXAMPLE: increased movement of people (economic migrants/asylum seekers) has worried western populations about the risk of crime (impacted by the media/moral panics)
Hobbs and Dunningham
the way crime is organised is linked to economic changes caused by globalisation, involving individuals with contacts that create a loose network of people seeking both legitimate and illegitimate opportunities
‘glocal’ organisation
crime is rooted in a local context, but has international links, such as drug trades
McMafia
Glenny - used this term to refer to post-communism organisations that gained wealth, after the deregulation of most sectors, by buying diamonds and oil for cheap and selling them on for astronomical prices
Rothe and Friedrichs
bodies, such as banks, impose capitalist ‘structural adjustment programmes’ on poorer countries, cutting down health and education services
this allowed western corporations to expand into developing countries, causing mass unemployment in places like Rwanda
South
differentiates between primary and secondary green crime
primary green crime
the direct result of destroying the earth’s resources
- air pollution
- deforestation
- decline in species
- water pollution
secondary green crime
flouting the rules that aim to regulate or prevent environmental disasters
- state violence against oppositional groups (i.e., France blowing up the Greenpeace ship in New Zealand that was there to stop France testing nuclear weapons in the South Pacific)
- hazardous waste and organised crime (i.e., Eco-mafias in Italy dumping illegal waste because it is cheaper, making profit)
global risk society and the environment
crimes such as Chernobyl show us how threats to humans and nature are often man-made instead of natural
Mozambique
the man-made 2010 heatwave that destroyed crops in Russia forced them to ban exports, and so the world price of grain went up
Mozambique - the price of bread rose by 30%, which caused riots and looting, leading to deaths
traditional criminology
not concerned with green crime because it doesn’t usually go against the law
AO3 of green criminology
they accept definitions of crime from powerful groups (international regulators) who serve their own interests
White
green criminology - the subject of criminology should include what harms the physical environment, whether it breaks the law or not
there are two views of harm:
1. anthropocentric - nation-states assume humans have the right to dominate nature
2. ecocentric - humans and the environment are interdependent, meaning environmental harm also harms us
AO3 of green criminology
focusing on harms over the law makes it harder to distinguish between what is green crime and what isn’t, political/moral statements should be made to address this
Green and Ward
state crime = illegal or deviant activities perpetuated by or with the complicity of state agencies
it is serious because:
- the scale of state crime - the state’s power can harm on a huge scale (i.e., 262M were murdered by governments in the 20th century)
- the state is the source of law - the state can conceal crimes and evade punishment
McLaughlin
there are 4 types of state crime
- political (corruption)
- crimes by the police or security (genocide)
- economic (violations of laws)
- social and cultural (institutional racism)
state crime case study: genocide in Rwanda
their Hutu president being shot down triggered 800,000 Tutsis people being slaughtered in 100 days
war crimes
- illegal wars
- crimes committed during or in the aftermath of war (i.e., torturing prisoners)