Gross Negligence Manslaughter Flashcards
(12 cards)
What does r v broughton set out
- D must owe v a duty of care
- D must breach that duty of care
- There must be a serious and obvious risk of death
- The risk of death must be reasonably foreseeable
- Ds breach must cause vs death
- The breach must be grossly negligent
Name all the duty of care cases
Contractual- R v pittwood
Relationship- R v gibbons and proctor
Public office- R v dythem
Creating dangerous situations- dpp v Santana burmedez
Voluntary assumption of responsibility- R v stone and dobinson
Blyth v Birmingham waterworks
Breach of duty is defined as something a reasonable man wouldn’t do or not something a reasonable man would do
Bolam
Being a professional will increase the standard of care
Mullins v Richards
Age will lower the standard of care
Nettleship v Weston
Inexperience doesn’t effect the standard of care
Miller v Jackson
Size of risk
Watt v hcc
Benefit over risk
Latimer v AEC
Practicality of precautions
Paris v sbc
Seriousness of risk
R v rose
Serious and obvious risk, which was reasonably foreseeable to a reasonable person
R v broughton set out for gross negligence
1.What has D done that’s bad
2. What has d done that wasn’t bad