Group Success Flashcards
(34 cards)
Carrons- characteristics of a group
1) two or more interacting
2) all the individuals have a shared goal
3) they have a collective identity
4) they are structured forms of communication
Tuckman- 4 stages of development
1) Forming- develop social relationships- rely on coach to bring group closer together
2) Storming- conflict as individuals establish their position
3) Norming- group cohesion develops- motivation and success rises
4) Performing- all players work together- respect other members and fully focused on achieving goals
Steiners model of group performance
Actual Productivity= potential productivity- losses due to faulty processes
What is Actual Productivity?
The level of achievement on a specific task
What is Potential Productivity?
The best level of achievement possible when it is consistent
Faulty processes can be divided into 2…
1) Co ordination losses- lack of teamwork- tactics
2) Motivational losses- losing concentration- over aroused
What is the Ringlemann Effect?
The greater the number of people in the group, the lower the performance of the individuals
What is Social Loafing?
When performers may hide when in a team often because they feel their effort is not being recognised
How can social loafing be caused?
- no clear role in the team
- low self efficacy
- learned helplessness
- teammates are doing the same
- poor leadership
- social inhibition due to an offensive crowd
Strategies to minimise social loafing
- giving player responsibility
- giving feedback
- using video analysis
- setting challenging goals
- develop social cohesion
- develop high levels of fitness
- highlight their role in the team
What is Task Cohesion?
- group members work in unity to meet a common aim
- may not socialise away from the team but come together for the task to get good results
What is Social Cohesion?
- group members feel attached and get along with others- they communicate and support one another outside the sport
Strategies to develop cohesion within a group
- practice and training drills
- roles and expectations
- setting specific targets
- giving individual responsibility
- devolving social cohesion away from training
- create group identity
- encourage peer support
- attempt to maintain stability
- identifying social loafers
Identify and explain Carron’s antecedents (factors) that contribute to the cohesiveness of a group. (3 marks)
A. Environment/situational factors – size of group/time/facilities/age or equivalent
B. Member/personal factors – ability/motivation/satisfaction/similarity
of group or equivalent
C. Leadership factors – style/behaviour/personality/relationship with
group or equivalent
D. Team factors – task/motivation/stability/ability/shared experiences
or equivalent
E. Four correct factors named but no explanation
Explain the importance of cohesion to group productivity and outline possible
strategies that can be used to reduce the negative impact of faulty processes on
performance. (14 marks)
Importance of Cohesion
A. Cohesion – tendency of a group to stay together to achieve their goal/task
B. Cohesion depends on group members/task/leader/teambased factors/equiv.
C. Actual productivity = potential productivity – losses due to faulty processes
D. Co-ordination losses/faulty processes eg poor teamwork/ poor tactics
E. Motivational losses/faulty processes eg loss of concentration/low self-confidence
F. Social loafing – performer ‘hides’ within a team
G. Ringelmann effect – Performance/cohesion may decrease as group size increases
H. Task cohesion – ability of group to work together to achieve a common goal
I. Social cohesion – interaction of players and their interpersonal relationships
J. Task cohesion is more important than social cohesion/ team can be successful with poor social cohesion
K. Social cohesion can undermine performance/formation of cliques/not challenging poor performance for fear of upsetting others
L. Social cohesion can aid performance by challenging the norm
Strategies
M. Practice/training to ensure all understand the tactics
N. Give individuals specific responsibility/set goals
O. Explain specific roles within the team
P. Give feedback/video analysis of performance/ reinforcement
Q. Develop peer support/encourage each other/encourage open discussion/an effective leader
R. Vary practice to maintain motivation/train in small groups
S. Improve fitness levels
T. Team bonding exercises/social outings
U. Avoid social cliques
V. Create a group identity eg team kit
W. Develop self-confidence/self-efficacy/self-esteem/ credit use of attributions
X. Maintain team stability if possible/limit change
Explain the term task cohesion and why it is vital for success in any game (4)
1) The ability of the group to achieve a common goal.
2) Players need to be able to interact effectively / good communication
3) Understand own role – good co-ordination
4) Poor cohesion is a faulty process
5) Good task cohesion means good social cohesion
6) Social cohesion – the ability for the group to relate well to each other
Games players have to work alongside their team mates and try to maintain their levels of
exertion right up to the end of the game.
a) Name and explain the stages that groups tend to go through before they become
established as a successful team. (4 marks)
- Forming – get to know each other/relationships
- Storming – roles become established, often contentious/conflict
- Norming – stability/co-operation/cohesive
- Performing – roles and relationships established/feel part of team/working
towards common goals
According to Steiner, a team’s actual productivity depends upon their potential
productivity less their faulty processes. What are the two main faulty processes that
can limit a team’s productivity? (2 marks)
- Motivational factors
2. Co-ordination factors
Distinguish between social loafing and the Ringlemann effect. (2 marks)
- Social loafing – reduced motivation/effort
2. Ringlemann effect – more people - less effort/co-ordination
Explain the terms actual productivity and potential productivity and identity
factors that might affect the potential productivity of a team. (4 marks)
- Actual productivity – performance achieved by a team
- Potential productivity – teams’ possible best performance
- Depends on resources eg ability/skills/knowledge/fitness/experiences
- Second eg given
What are the possible causes of losses due to faulty group processes?
(4 marks)
- Co-ordination losses
- Player’s skills are not interwoven into unity/tactical failings/lack of
teamwork - More interactive sports suffer the more difficult co-ordination
losses/accept reverse - Ringlemann effect
- Less interactive/co-active sports suffer less from co-ordination
losses/accept reverse - Motivational losses
- Social loafing
- Players feel they can expect others to do the work
What antecedents (factors) may affect the cohesiveness of a group? (4 marks)
- Size of group;
- Similarity of status/ability/performance level;
- Type of sport/interactiveness of the activity;
- Stability of group members;
- External threats/outside influences;
- Satisfaction of team members/get on well together/share the same
goals/role acceptance; - Success of group;
- Leadership/style/type.
What do you understand by the term cohesion and explain the different types of
cohesion. (3 marks)
A. (Forces) keeping a group together/resistance to breaking up/team works
together;
B. Task cohesion . working to common goals/targets/tasks;
C. Social cohesion . interpersonal attraction/liking each other/socialising
together.
Social loafing can occur within sports teams. What do you understand by the
term social loafing and what factors may cause it? (5 marks)
A. Individuals put in less than 100% effort/lack of motivation/can.t be bothered;
B. Individual.s output not measured effectively/able to hide/shirk responsibility;
C. Task/goal lacks meaning for the individual/;
D. Individuals. personal involvement is low/role conflict/not understanding the
role/lack of assigned role/disagree with role;
E. Individual.s efforts cannot be compared to group standards/lack of fitness;
F. Some of the group are not known to other individuals/sub groups/cliques/
limited cohesion;
G. Individual expects other co-workers to do well/relying on others;
H. Individual believes his efforts will go unnoticed/undervalued/unappreciated;
I. Easier to loaf with more people sub max 4 marks