HIV Flashcards
(13 cards)
Describe the structure of a HIV particle:
- Lipid envelope.
- RNA
3 Reverse transcriptase - Capsid
- Attachment protein
Describe the replication of HIV in helper T cells
- HIV attachment proteins attach to receptors on helper T cell 2. Lipid envelope fuses with cell-surface membrane, releasing capsid into cell 3. Capsid uncoats, releasing RNA and reverse transcriptase
- Reverse transcriptase converts viral RNA to DNA
- Viral DNA inserted / incorporated into helper T cell DNA (may remain latent) 6. Viral protein / capsid / enzymes are produced
a. DNA transcribed into HIV mRNA
b. HIV mRNA translated into new HIV proteins - Virus particles assembled and released from cell (via budding).
Explain how HIV causes the symptoms of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS):
- HIV infects and kills helper T cells (host cell) as it multiplies rapidly
-So T helper cells can’t stimulate cytotoxic T cells, B cells and phagocytes
- So B plasma cells can’t release as many antibodies for agglutination & destruction of pathogens - Immune system deteriorates → more susceptible to (opportunistic) infections
- Pathogens reproduce, release toxins and damage cells
Explain why antibiotics are ineffective against viruses:
- Viruses do not have structures / processes that antibiotics inhibit:
- Viruses do not have metabolic processes (eg. do not make protein) / ribosomes
- Viruses do not have bacterial enzymes / murein cell wall
Explain how monoclonal antibodies can be used in medical diagnosis:
- MCAB have a specific tertiary structure
- Complementary to specific receptor.
- Dye attached to antibody
- Antibody binds to receptor, forming an antigen-antibody complex.
Explain the use of antibodies in the ELISA test: direct ELISA
- Attach sample with potential antigens to well
- Add complementary monoclonal antibodies with enzymes attached → bind to antigens if present
- Wash well → remove unbound antibodies (to prevent false positive)
- Add substrate → enzymes create products that cause a colour change (positive result)
Explain the use of antibodies in the ELISA test: sandwich ELISA
- Attach specific MCAB to well.
- Add sample with potential antigens, then wash well.
- Add complementary MCABs with enzymes attached, bind to antigens if present.
- Wash well, remove unbound antibodies, prevent false positive.
- Add substrate, enzymes create products that cause a colour change.
Explain the use of antibodies in the ELISA test to detect antibodies
- Attach specific antigens to well.
- Add sample with potential antibodies, then wash well.
- Add complementary MCABs with enzymes attached, bind to antibodies if present.
- Wash well, remove unbound antibodies, prevent false positive.
- Add substrate, enzymes create products that cause a colour change.
Suggest the purpose of a control well in the ELISA test
- Compare to test to show only enzyme causes colour change.
- Compare to show all unbound antibodies have been washed away.
Suggest the purpose of a control well in the ELISA test:
- Antibody with enzyme remains/washed out.
- So substrate converted into colour product.
Discuss some general ethical issues associated with the use of vaccines of MCABs:
- Pre-clinical testing on animals, potential stress.
- Animals not killed, reduces human suffering.
- Clinical trials on humans, potential harm.
- Vaccines, may continue high risk activities and still develop/ pass on pathogens.
- Use of drug, potentially dangerous side effects.
Suggest some points to consider when evaluating methodology relating to the use of vaccines and MCAB?
- Was the sample size large enough to be representative?
- Were participants diverse in terms of age, sex, ethnicity and health status?
- Were placebo / control groups used for comparison?
- Was the duration of the study long enough to show long-term effects?
5 Was the trial double-blind (neither doctor / patient knew who was given drug or placebo) to reduce bias?
Suggest some points to consider when evaluating evidence and data relating to the use of vaccines and monoclonal antibodies:
- What side effects were observed, and how frequently did they occur?
- Was a statistical test used to see if there was a significant difference between start & final results?
- Was the standard deviation of final results large, showing some people did not benefit?
- Did standard deviations of start & final results overlap, showing there may not be a significant difference?
- What dosage was optimum? Does increasing dose increase effectiveness enough to justify extra cost?
- Was the cost of production & distribution low enough?