Homicide Offences Flashcards
(31 cards)
what is the definition of Homicide and what offences fall under this?
unlawful killing of a human being under the kings peace- offences include:
-murder
-voluntary manslaughter (diminished resp., loss of control, suicide pact)
-Involuntary manslaughter (gross negligence, recklessness, unlawful dangerous acts)
what is murder?
unlawful killing with intention to kill or cause GBH (accelerated death counts as causation)
explain case of r v vickers(1957)
D commits burglary, killed woman as he got caught but intended to cause GBH
establish the distinction between 1st and 2nd degree murder
1st degree includes the intent to kill or cause serious harm with awareness of serious risk of death however 2nd degree includes intent to cause less severe harm
what is voluntary manslaughter: diminished responsibility?
reduces murder liability if D was suffering from
-abnormality of mental functioning (strong reliance on medical evidence)
-recognised medical condition -substantial impairment
-provides an explanation
reduces moral blameworthiness
explain case of R v Byrne 1960
D strangled girl and mutilated her body- was charged with murder but downgraded to manslaughter (DR) as he was sexual psychopath- couldn’t control this
explain case of r v dowds 2012
D killed partner with 60 knife wounds- relied on DR for recognised medical conditions (binge drinker) - guilty of murder as voluntary drinking didn’t amount to partial defence
explain case of r v ramchurn 2010
killed wife after she had affair with cousin by strangling her- substantial impairment - DR
what is Voluntary manslaughter: loss of control?
Partial defence to murder where d’s actions are attributable to their loss of self control
what is the 3 part test for Voluntary manslaughter: loss of control
-Loss of self control
-Qualifying trigger
-Nature of reaction
elaborate on loss of self control
D must lose self control- need not be sudden, precludes considered revenge
elaborate on qualifying triggers of loss of self control VM
-Fear of serious violence - evaluated based on D’s belief
-Things said or done - must constitute extremely grave circumstances, cause justifiable sense of being seriously wronged (removed unjustifiable uses like racist or honour killings, sexual infidelity excluded)
elaborate on nature of reaction- loss of control VM
would someone of D’s age sex and circumstance have acted similarly
explain the case r v thornton 1992
D killed alcoholic abusive husband with knife she sharpened before after he told her he’d kill her if she didn’t get out and relied on defence of DR based on personality disorder
elaborate on case r v Dawes 2013
D found estranged wife sleeping on sofa with man- began punching him and hit him with vodka bottle then stabbed him- convicted of murder
explain case r v clinton 2012
wife was having affairs and D kills her- guilty of murder and arson- didn’t qualify for loss of control VM
explain case r v asmelash 2013
D insulted by V and was drunk- he stabbed V to death- intoxication not a defence- held guilty of murder
explain case r v rejmanski (2017)
D had PTSD and killed someone during argument- sought loss of control due to mental disorder- held guilty of murder
what comes under Involuntary manslaughter
-Unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter
-Gross negligence manslaughter
-Recklessness manslaughter
what is unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter
D commits an act that is unlawful, Dangerous and causes death- does not include omissions- negligence and strict liability offences are insufficient- no need for foresight of serious harm
explain the case R v Church (1966)
had sex with V, she passed out and D thought she was dead so threw her body in the river- she drowned
charged with unlawful act manslaughter
explain the case Andrew’s v DPP (1937)
D drove van above speed limit and overtook another car, he hit a pedestrian and killed him
was held guilty of unlawful act manslaughter
explain case r v dawson 1985
D approached petrol station with fake gun to attempt robbery- V had heart condition and suffered heart attack due to shock and died
D held guilty of unlawful act manslaughter
r v slingsby 1995
having anal and sex with V- didn’t take off ring and caused internal injuries leading to sepsis- couldn’t be charged with unlawful act manslaughter as no crime (was consensual)