Sexual Offences Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

what is consent

A

V agrees by choice and has freedom(no coercion or deception) and capacity(mental ability to understand) to make that choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Watson (2015)

A

D fathered child given up for adoption at 17 (v), 1st made contact aged 52 and began sexual r/ including bondage- V stated on 3 instances- were rape as sex wasn’t consensual - D convicted of 2 counts of rape and 2 of assault by penetration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Jheeta (2007)

A

D and V in sexual r/s- after V broke off r/s D pretended to be police officer in messages demanding v have sex with with him threatening a fine if she didn’t- guilty of rape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Bree (2007)

A

V engaged in sexual intercourse while intoxicated- she was lucid enough to consent- D convicted of rape - appeal conviction was quashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what do the 5 evidential presumptions include

A
  • use of threat of violence
  • V unlawfully detained
  • v asleep/ unconscious
  • v has physical disability preventing communication
  • drugs administered to stupefy V
    (rebuttable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Cicarelli (2011)

A

D and gf brought friend (V) back to apartment after a party- D sexually assaulted V while she was asleep- convicted of rape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what do the 2 conclusive presumptions include

A
  • deception as to nature or purpose
  • deception as to identity (requires intentional deception)
    (irrebutable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Williams (1923)

A

D gave V singing lessons and had sex with her under pretence it would improve her breathing- held D was guilty of rape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Devonald (2008)

A

D thought daughter ex had mistreated her and pretended to be 20 yr old girl on web persuading him to masturbate on camera so D could release footage
Charged with causing person to engage in sexual activity without consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Elbekkay (1995)

A

D out for evening with V and her Bf - returned to V flat V went to bed and they continued drinking - D hopped into bed with her and she engaged in sexual intercourse thinking it was her bf
held guilty of rape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is rape under SOA 2003

A

AR- penetration of vagina anus mouth with d’s penis and V does not consent
MR- Intent to penetrate, lack of reasonable belief in consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is assault by penetration under SOA 2003

A

AR- penetration of vagina or anus using body part or object penetration must be sexual and v does not consent
MR- Intent to penetrate, lack of reasonable belief in consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Hill (2006)

A

D and V lived together- D pulls V trousers down mid argument and fingers her - admitted guilt
charged with assault by penetration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is sexual assault under SOA 2003

A

AR- D touches V in a sexual way and V does not consent
MR- intent to touch, lack of reasonable belief in consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v H (2005)

A

D propositions V sexually and tries to pull her toward him and place hand over her mouth by grabbing pocket of her tracksuit - Convicted of sexual assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

r v court (1989)

A

pulled 12 year old girl over knee and smacked her - said he had fetish
charged with indecent assault

17
Q

what are the steps to ascertain consent

A
  • D’s efforts to confirm consent are relevant
  • excludes intoxicated beliefs (reasonable sober person) (MR shifts to reasonableness)