HTA - lecture 1 - introduction in HTA/ EE Flashcards

1
Q

HTA definition

A

HTA is the systematic evaluation of properties, effects and/or impacts of health technologies and interventions. It covers both the direct, intended consequences of technologies and interventions and their indirect, unintended consequences.
~WHO definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

economic evaluations

A
  • Economic evaluations provide insight costs and effects of:
    o (new) interventions
    o Compared with existing interventions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the six steps of performing an EE in health care

A
  1. study design
  2. costs: measuring and valuation
  3. benefits: measuring and valuation
  4. discounting
  5. sensitivity: analysis
  6. policy making
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

step 1: study design

A

a) perspective - who is going to pay?
b) choice of comparator
c) type of analyses
d) time horizon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

a) perspective - who is going to pay?

A

two dominant perspectives
1. health care perspective
2. societal perspective

–> perspective determines which costs and effects to include in the assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

health care perspective

A

costs and effects falling on health care budget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

societal perspective

A

all relevant costs and effects (doesn’t matter within HC or not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

b) choice of comparator

A
  • Most efficient alternative
    o Selection of alternatives. (as comparator) is crucial
    o Comparator: expensive? Then it depends on the old treatment whether it’s more expensive or not
  • Standard treatment
    o You need to compare to standard treatment
  • Consider “no treatment”
  • Placebo not preferred
    o That is only happening in trials

You compare alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

c) type of analyses

A
  • Only costs
  • Cost minimization analysis (CMA)
  • Effects are equal, focus on costs
  • Cost and effects in monetary terms
  • Cost benefit analysis (CBA)  multiply health effects with a monetary terms and you compare it to the cost of the alternative
    > Extremely difficult; natural outcomes/units (e.g. heart attacks avoided, readmissions)  no monetary terms from literature available
    > It’s about gaining/losing welfare
  • Costs in monetary terms, effects in natural units
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) –> e.g. how money do we have to pay for one infection or readmission of a patient
  • Costs in monetary terms, effects in QALYs
  • Cost-utility analysis (CUA)  how much must we pay to gain one QALY?; officially not correct, but used a lot
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

d) time horizon

A
  • All consequences must be taken into account
  • Lifetime horizon, so till the people die
  • Complex to do because you need to follow people for a long time
  • How to do so?
  • Randomised trial (RCT)
  • Observational study
  • Model (cohort or individual patient model)
  • Combination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

step 2: measuring and valuing costs

A
  1. identify all relevant cost items
  2. measure resource use
  3. value resource use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

step 3: measuring and valuing effects

A
  1. identify, measure and value effects of interventions
  2. disease specific measures
  3. generic measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

step 4: discounting

A
  • We have time preference for both costs and health effects.
  • We want positive health effects now
  • We want to postpone costs we rather pay later; welfare increasing, if we have to pay 100 in 10 years time, that is less than if we have to pay 100 today (investing, making more or use money) –> uncertainty: we want to have a treatment now; avoiding develop disease 20 years later (so, less value attached in the future)
  • Costs later in time weight less –> welfare is increasing 100 euros now is less than 100 euros in ten years
  • Effects later in time have less value –> a lot can change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

step 5: uncertainty

A
  • –> data limited data, extrapolate it –> uncertainty (10-20 years after follow-up study); demonstrate impact on the outcome
  • The values used in economic evaluations are estimates
  • Based on sample of population
  • Uncertainty is associated with all estimates
  • Sensitivity analysis to find out how sensitive cost-effectiveness outcomes are to changes in parameters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

step 6: applying a decision rule

A

Calculate the ICER
When is an intervention cost-effective?
QALY threshold?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ICER = cost effectiveness ratio (calculation)

A

(costs A - costs B) / (effects A - effects B) = … euro per effect

17
Q

after calculation ICER, apply decision rule

A

is ratio below or above the WTP for a QALY –> WTP (v-threshold)

is ratio below or above our current healthcare production –> marginal returns (k-threshold)

18
Q

v - threshold

A
  1. Comparing it to WTP/V-threshold: how much would people pay for 1 QALY?  people who have the disease have other WTP than people without the disease. People are willing to pay more for disease/treatment with a very high burden (quality of life/remaining life expectancy is very low)  people willing to pay more for QALY than if quality of life is already quite high
    - First example of this lecture: we need to know if this is a long or short duration (comparing to what? 11 months for example?)
    - Thresholds: 30.000 for diseases for relatively low burden; 50.000 in between; 80.000 only for diseases with very high burden (quality of life and life expectancy is low without treatment)
    - We are willing to pay more for people who are worse off; other countries this is different
19
Q

k-threshold

A
  1. K-threshold  currently paying in HC to produce QALY adjusted life year: k-threshold looks at HC budget, try to make estimation of QALY that current HC system is producing with budget right now. Budget is fixed, cannot double it. Given that we have a fixed HC budget, if we decide to reimburse treatment with worse cost-effectiveness ratio  burning/losing money as society/losing QALY’s. Spend it on treatment with lower QALY means burning health as society. Everything we add, somethings loss from the BBP. Losing care
    > Be transparent about it: overall losing life years, then make sure that this is what we actually want and at least make this explicit
    > Difficult, because difficult to determine what we produce with HC budget now; usually what is lost is not that transparent
20
Q

economic evaluations

A
  • Rationalizing rationing decisions
  • Not about saving costs
  • Efficiency in health care spending
  • Value for money