Influence of others Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

Co-Actor

A

Another individual performing the same task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social facilitation

A

The increased performance that occurs in the presence of co-actors or an audience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social facilitation

A

The increased performance that occurs in the presence of co-actors or an audience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Complications of Triplett’s hypothesis

A

The presence of others can sometimes hinder rather than help a performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Zajonc’s resolution of conflicting data

A

Usually in simple tasks performance is enhanced with an audience, but for complex tasks performance is worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social learning theory

A

We learn appropriate behaviour by modeling and imitating the behaviour of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Main finding of Bobo Doll experiment

A

children imitate adults without expecting a reward.

  • adults hit doll, kids hit doll
  • adults hit clown in disguise, kids hit clown
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

autokinetic effect

A

It is an optical illusion. Participants watch a stationary light in a black room which appears to move. This effect causes the participants to imagine a movement that never occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

autokinetic effect

A

It is an optical illusion. Participants watch a stationary light in a black room which appears to move. This effect causes the participants to imagine a movement that never occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Results of Sherif’s experiment

A

A confederate of the experiment gave a large number of movement. The responses moved towards the large estimate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Description of Asch’s experiment and results

A

Participants would see one simple line and 3 comparison lines. Had to identify the lines that were identical. When confederates agreed on clearly wrong responses, 75% participants conformed once to a wrong response and 37% conformed to all wrong responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Normative

A

role of others in setting standards for our conduct based in a fear of rejection. Ex: fashion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Informational function

A

role of others in providing information about an ambiguous situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stoner’s experiment set-up

A

Asked individuals to read a said of hypothetical situations to make risk assessments. One was in group and others individually.

  • Groups accepted the situation with a lower possibility of success and higher risk
  • Individuals accepted situation with a higher probability of success
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Group polarization

A

Group decision making strengthens the original inclinations of the individual group members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Groupthink

A

A group decision environment that occurs when group cohesiveness becomes so strong, it overrides realistic appraisais of reality and alternative opinions.

  • those who disagree are rejected from the group
  • believe that they are right and everyone else is wrong.
15
Q

4 ways to prevent groupthink

A
  1. Be impartial
  2. Critical evaluation: allow group members to disagree
  3. Subdivide the group: separate decisions and later reunite to discuss
  4. Provide a second chance: second meeting
16
Q

Pluralistic ignorance

A

When each individual in a group sees nobody responding in a given situation, they conclude that the situation is not an emergency.

17
Q

Supporting evidence for pluralistic ignorance

A
  • Fear of personal injury
  • expect others to help(more if there are more people)
  • case of Kitty Genovese
18
Q

Diffusion of Responsibility

A

In deciding whether we have to act, we determine that someone else in the group is more qualified.

19
Q

What can increase the chances of receiving help?

A
  • decide who will help you, it will break through pluralistic ignorance and diffusion of responsibility.
  • when seeing someone help others, the chances of you helping someone in the future increase.
20
Q

Stanley Milgram’s experiment

A
  • participant is a teacher, and is supposed to shock the learner when given the wrong responses. 65% of participants continued until the end. Delivering ‘‘danger’’ shock to a non responsive man with heart condition.
21
Q

In Milgram’s experiment, when they changed locations what were the results?

A

did not change the results

22
Q

In Milgram’s experiment, when scientific dressed more casual what were the results?

A

obedience decreased

23
In Milgram's experiment, the teacher's distance to the learner increased what were the results?
higher proportion of participants obeying
24
Cognitive dissonance
state of psychological discomfort brought on by conflict between a person's attitude and behaviour
25
Overjustification effect
The resolution dissonance as conflict in behaviour and attitude are justified by some external means
26
Stanford Prison experiment
some participants were prisoners and others were gurds. The guards had sadistic behaviours, the experiment only lasted 6 days
27
Deindividuation
a group situation, the loss of a sense of personal responsibility and restraint - anonymity increases this
28
3 traits that may enhance a communicator's persuasiveness
- Those who are more expert on the field - physical attraction(advertising) - similarity(persuasive for lifestyle choices) and credibility (for objective fact)
29
On what the decision to argue on one-side or two-side depends?
The initial stance - initially agrees: one-sided - initially disagrees: two-sided
29
On what the decision to argue on one-side or two-side depends?
The initial stance - initially agrees: one-sided - initially disagrees: two-sided
30
Central appeal
- well reasoned, factual, two-sided arguments | - Effective for academic audiences
31
peripheral appeal
- well presented, easy to understand, simple | - effective for non-academic audiences
32
Foot in Door technique
any one request in a series is considered in relation to the previous request. Escalating magnitude.
33
Low-Ball technique
An escalation of the terms of an agreement after someone has already agreed to comply.