Injunctions: Define & Right to Assessment Flashcards

1
Q

What does Section 37 Senior Courts Act, 1981 relate to?

A

Interim or final injunctions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 37 (1) Senior Courts Act, 1981?

A

Injunctions can be interlocutory / interim or final

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 37 (2) Senior Courts Act, 1981?

A

injunctions can be made with conditions or unconditionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When can the High Court grant an injunction?

A

Where it is “just and convenient” to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What type of remedy is an injunction?

A

An equitable remedy / discretionary / not available as a remedy of right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What test did Americ issueCyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd 1975 set out?

A
  1. There is a serious
    issue to be tried.
  2. Damages would be an adequate remedy.
  3. Where the “balance of convenience”, lays?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does a serious issue to be tried mean? American Cyanamide Co v Ethicon 1975

A

That there are real prospects of success.

In relation to an interim injunction the claim has substance
It’s not frivolous or Vexatious
It is not necessary to show the final injunction is more likely than not to be obtained. 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What consideration to the court give in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd 1975 to damages being an adequate remedy?

A
  1. Whether the damages are an adequate remedy from the applicants point of you
  2. Consideration of the parties financial positions
  3. Whether damages are an adequate remedy from the respondents point of you
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the court give consideration to when looking at the balance of convenience in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd 1975 

A

The court is to weigh the respective inconvenience or loss to each party if an interim injunction is granted or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What FACTORS did the court consider when weighing up where the balance of convenience lays in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd 1975

A
  1. Deprivation of employment
  2. Importance of preserving confidential information
  3. Damage of goodwill to the business
  4. And attitude and conduct of the parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which CPR PD sets out the procedural rules for Interim injunctions

A

CPR PD 25A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What power does CPR 44.1 provide the court with?

A

The Court has discretion to award costs.

CPR 44.1
a)  To determine where the cost of payable by one party to another?
b) if so, how much?
c) When costs are to be paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which section and statue gives the court discretion to allow recoverability of costs in relation to injunction applications?

A

Section 51 Supreme Courts Act 1981

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which part of the CPR provides the General Rule that the unsuccessful party pays the successful party’s costs?

A

CPR 44.2 (2) (a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does CPR 44.2 (2) (b) allow the court to do?

A

The Court may make a different order relation to costs for example where there is no successful party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly