Interception of Communications Flashcards
What can interception be described as?
The act of making the content of Communication available to a person who is neither the sender nor the intended recipient of that communication
When are state agencies permitted to invade our privacy via interception?
For legitimate aims of protecting national security and preventing and detecting crime as Article 8 (the right to respect for family and private life) is a qualified right
However, it is crucial that there are safeguards in place to protect against unreasonable or arbitrary intrusion, particularly that of proper authorisation
What type of right is Article 8?
Qualified right and therefore can be removed for legitimate reasons states in Article 8 (2)
What positive and negative obligations does Article 8 contain?
-The state is under a positive obligation to act in a manner which protects an individual’s right to privacy and family life
-The state is under a negative obligation to not interfere with privacy rights
Prior to 1885 what requirements where there to follow a legal procedure?
No requirements when authorising the tapping of telephones and the interception of mail.
Instead conditions were laid down in administrative rules not legislation
=this violated the longstanding principle set in Entick v Carrington “executive power may not be exercised save where there is legal basis for it” also supported by the Rule of Law- no punishment without the law
What was the longstanding principle established in Entick v Carrington?
“executive power may not be exercised save where there is a legal basis for it”
Pre any actual legislation when would interception be authorised (3 part test)?
1)To assist in a criminal investigation (in serious crimes)
2)Where normal methods had been tried and failed
3)There was good reason for believing that evidence gained would lead to a conviction
(all 3 required = safeguard, however arguably vague)
When were legislative rules eventually introduced in regards to the tapping of telephones and interception of mail?
1985
under the Interception of Communications Act 1985 partly as a response to the ECtHR ruling in Malone v Uk
=subject to stricter controls
what happened in Malone v UK?
D on trial for receiving stolen goods, evidence was obtained via phone tapping. The interception had been authorised by the home secretary under “administrative guidelines”. D argued that his article 8 right had been breached as the interception was not in accordance with the law ( as there is no law) and thus a violation. ECtHR recommended the introduction of legislation
What was the Interception of Communications Act 1985 repealed by?
Regulation of the Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and the current rules governing these intercepts are now contained within the Investigatory Powers Act 2016
What was introduced under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016?
Introduced some new powers and restated some existing ones to allow certain agencies to carry out targeted interception
What does the IPA 2016 permit the snooping of?
“Equipment interference”
“Bulk personal datasets”
“Bulk warrants”
What did the IPA 2016 create?
Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (safeguard since 2016) to oversee the use of powers and updated the role of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal which provides a right of redress for anyone who believes they have been a victim of unlawful action by a body undertaking surveillance
What do Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agencies now require to access certain information?
A warrant
Must be requested and approved by the secretary of state, a judicial commissioner must also authorise this before it can be activated (acts as a double lock). This ensures that all Investigatory Powers Act warrants issued are necessary and proportionate
What is within S.3 IPA 2016?
Makes it an offence to intentionally and without lawful authority intercept communications by mail or telephone
=Triable either way offence max 2 years in Crown Court
Prosecution requires approval from the DPP (Safeguard)
What does S.18 IPA 2016 allow?
Lists who can apply for a warrant
Permits the following “intercepting authorities” to apply for a warrant including head of intelligence service and chief constables of the Police (Short list of People=safeguard)
What does S.19 IPA 2016 allow?
Secretary of State can issue warrants if necessary and proportionate in relation to the grounds in S.20 IPA 2016
What is in S.20 IPA 2016?
Grounds on which to issue a warrant
-Interest of national security
-preventing or detecting crime
-interest of the economic wellbeing of the Uk
What is S.23 IPA 2016?
The warrant is subject to the approval from judicial commissioner= “double lock” and safeguard, however not necessary in emergencies where notice will be given after (s.24)= dilutes the safeguard
What is S.32 and S.33 of the IPA 2016?
Warrants last for 6 months and can be renewed an unlimited number of times for 30 days= safeguard
What is the Police Act 1997 about?
Planting of Bugging devices inside properties
What case led to the introduction of the Police Act 1997?
Khan
A bugging device had been installed in the outside of a house which Khan had been visiting. Khan was suspected of being involved with the importation of drugs which the tape recording confirmed. D argued that recording was inadmissible as the police had no statutory authority and therefore breached D’s article 8. Court of appeal agreed with trespass however court said such issues outweighed by the fact the police largely stuck to administrative guide lines. HL recommended legislation= led to Police Act 1997
What is S.92 Police Act 1997?
Absolute immunity for police
=gives absolute immunity against any criminal or civil action where the conduct authorised under the act
What is S.93 (2) Police Act 1997?
Basis for authorising the planting of surveillance devices
-allows police to enter and plant surveillance devices without a usual warrant
this many be issued if the authorising officer believes:
(a) that it is necessary … for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime and
(b) that the taking of the action is proportionate to what the action seeks to achieve
=(essential means that action can be permitted if the chief constable subjectively believes it to be of substantial value in the prevention and detection of serious crime and the objective cannot reasonably be achieved by other means