Introduction and Overview of Audit and Assurance Flashcards
What is Auditing?
The verification of information by someone other than the person providing the information. Our role in this class is external auditors working in an audit firm verifying information.
We verify the information by:
re-calculating, observing, researching, our own knowledge, tracing to source documents, and vouching.
Auditing adhere to
Canadian Auditing Standards (CAS), CAS are based on international auditing standards.
There are many types of audits:
Compliance audits, environmental audits, forensic audits, internal audits (Focus on Financial statement audit)
Internal Audits and External Audits.
Done by people within the company and Done by independent people outside the company.
5 Elements 1. Three Parties
a. practitioner - (us-the external auditor)
b. Responsible party (Management of the company we are auditing)
c. User (shareholders)
5 Elements 2. Subject Matter
- Criteria - IFRS, ASPE, NPO and PSAB
- Sufficient Appropriate Evidence - our role is not to audit every transaction but to audit enough transactions to get reasonable assurance.
- Conclusion - The final audit report which indicates whether the financial statements are accurate or not.
Statutory Audits
Companies that are required to have an annual audit.
Voluntary Audit
Companies that choose to have an audit done.
Reasons for a voluntary audit:
1) To gain additional financing from the bank.
2) Two companies are merging
3) A company is acquiring another company.
Corporate Governance and Audit
Corporate Governance structure of a pubco
shareholders
Executives (CEO/CFO)
Management
Employees
Other users of external financial statement audit
Shareholders
Agency Risk and Audits
Agency risk is the risk that management within the company will do things that benefit themselves rather than the actual owners of the company which are shareholders.
Auditors are hired by the audit committee of the board of directors to represent the shareholders.
We are there to have the shareholder’s back by verifying the financial statements are accurate and thereby reducing agency risks.
Role of the auditor
1) To be independent in appearance and fact
2) To be objective
4) To exercise professional judgment.
5) To reduce the expectations gap
6) To reduce information risk.
Public Perception of an Auditor
- Auditor gets absolute assurance.
- Audit finds all errors.
- Auditor works for the executives.
- Auditor prepares the F/S
Reality of an Auditor
- Auditor gets reasonable assurance.
- Auditor finds material errors.
- Auditors work for the shareholders.
- The auditor verifies the F/S but does not prepare them.
Who Conducts Audits?
Only public accounting firms can perform external audits and only designated individuals (CPAs) sign off on an audit other accountants can conduct other services such as:
tax services
Consulting services
Compilation of Financial Statements
Different Levels of Assurance
Audit Reports- The conclusion of the Audit
Unmodified Opinion - Is a clean audit opinion; the auditor concludes that the financial statements are fairly presented.
Emphasis of matter - What results when an auditor issues an unmodified audit opinion when there is a significant issue that is adequately disclosed and there is a need to draw the attention of the user to it in the audit report.
Qualified opinion - an “except for” opinion provided where there is a material scope limitation or a material (significant) mistatement not pervasive to the overall financial statements.
Adverse Opinion - Opinion provided when the auditor concludes that there is a pervasive material misstatement in the financial statements.
disclaimer of opinion - Opinion provided when the impact of a scope limitation is so extreme than an auditor is unable to obrain sufficient appropriate evidence to base an opinion.
Financial Statement Users
Investors
In the case of a company, investors generally read the financial statements to determine whether they should invest in or buy, hold, or sell shares in the entity being reported on. They are interested in the return on their investment and are concerned that the entity will remain a going concern into the foreseeable future. Investors may also be interested in the capacity of the entity to pay a dividend. Prospective investors read financial statements to determine whether they should buy shares in the entity.
Suppliers
Suppliers may read the financial statements to determine whether the entity can pay them for goods supplied. They are also interested in whether the entity is likely to remain a going concern (that is, it is likely to continue to be a customer of the supplier) and continue to be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due.
Customers
If customers rely on the entity for their business, they may read the financial statements to determine whether the entity is likely to remain a going concern.
Lenders
Lenders may read the financial statements to determine whether the entity can pay the interest and principal on their loans as and when they fall due.
Employees
Employees may read the financial statements to determine whether the entity can pay their wages or salaries and other benefits (for example, vacation pay). They may also be interested in assessing the future stability and profitability of the entity, as this affects their job security.
Governments
Governments may read the financial statements to determine whether the entity is complying with regulations and paying a fair amount of taxation given its reported earnings and to gain a better understanding of the entity’s activities. An entity in receipt of government grants may provide a copy of its financial statements when applying for a grant and when reporting on how grant funds have been spent.
The General Public
The general public may read the financial statements to determine whether they should associate with the entity (for example, as a future employee, customer, or supplier) and to gain a better understanding of the entity, what it does, and its plans for the future.
Information Risk and Causes
Remoteness
Most financial statement users do not have access to the entity under review. This makes it difficult to determine whether the information contained in the financial statements is a fair presentation of the entity and its activities for the relevant period.
Complexity
Most financial statement users do not have the accounting and legal knowledge to enable them to assess the complex accounting and disclosure choices being made by the entity.
Competing Incentives
Management has an incentive to disclose the information contained in the financial statements in a way that helps them achieve their own objectives—for example, to present their performance in the best possible light. Users may find it difficult to identify when management is presenting biased information.
Reliability
Financial statement users are concerned with the reliability of the information contained in the financial statements. As they use that information to make decisions that have real consequences (financial and otherwise, such as assessing the future viability of the company), it is very important that users are able to rely on the facts contained in the financial statements.
An independent third-party review of the information contained in the financial statements by a team of auditors, who have the knowledge and expertise to assess the fair presentation of the information being presented by the preparers, aids users with all of these issues. Auditors have access to entity records, so they are not remote. They are trained accountants and have detailed knowledge about the complex technical accounting and disclosure issues required to assess the choices made by the financial statement preparers. Independent auditors have no incentives to aid the entity in presenting its results in the best possible light. They are concerned with ensuring that the information contained in the financial statements is reliable and free from any significant (material) misstatements (error or fraud).
Cloud 9 Integrated Case
Theoretical Frameworks
Agency Theory
When an individual is an owner-manager of their own business, there are no competing incentives. The owner (principal) and manager (agent) are one. When an owner hires a manager to run the business on their behalf, potential conflicts arise. The manager has the incentive to provide favorable results. If there is one owner, they can easily monitor the activities of the manager. When there are several owners (such as shareholders of a large company), it is difficult for the owners to monitor the activities of the management. Agency theory tells us that, due to the remoteness of the owners from the entity, the complexity of items included in the financial statements, and competing incentives between the owners and managers, the owners (principals) have an incentive to hire an auditor (incur a monitoring cost) to assess the fair presentation of the information contained in the financial statements prepared by their managers (agents).
Information Hypothesis
Financial statement users require access to high-quality information to make a variety of decisions. That information is used to determine whether to hold or sell shares in the entity, whether to lend money to the entity, what rate of interest to charge the entity on money lent, and so on. The greater the perceived quality of the information contained in the financial statements, the more likely it will be relied upon by the users of that information. The information hypothesis tells us that, due to the demand for reliable, high-quality information, various user groups, including shareholders, banks, and other lenders, will demand that financial statements be audited to aid their decision-making.
Insurance Hypothesis
Investors take on a risk when buying shares. If the entity fails, investors could lose the money invested. According to the insurance hypothesis, an audit is one way for investors to insure against at least part of their loss should the company they invest in fail. As auditors are required to take out professional indemnity insurance policies, they are seen as having “deep pockets” (that is, access to money), should an investor be able to prove that audit failure was to blame, at least in part, for a loss. The insurance hypothesis tells us that investors will demand that financial statements be audited as a way of insuring against some of their losses should their investments fail.
Different Assurance Services
A financial statement audit is an audit that provides reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are prepared in all material respects in accordance with the financial reporting framework
listed entity is an entity whose shares or debt are listed on a stock exchange
fair presentation the consistent and faithful application of accounting standards when preparing financial statements
a compliance audit is an audit to determine whether the entity has conformed to regulations, rules, or processes.
A performance audit is an assessment of the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of an organization’s operations.
comprehensive audit an audit that encompasses a range of audit and audit-related activities, such as a financial statement audit, performance audit, and compliance audit.
internal audit is an independent service within an entity that generally evaluates and improves risk management, internal control procedures, and elements of the governance process
those charged with governance generally the board of directors, and may include management of an entity, concerned with evaluating and improving risk management, internal control procedures, and elements of the governance process
corporate social responsibility (CSR) a range of activities undertaken voluntarily by a corporation; CSR disclosures include environmental, employee, and social reporting
consulting firms non-audit firms that provide assurance services on non-financial information, such as corporate social responsibility and environmental disclosures
Reasonable Assurance
reasonable assurance assurance that provides high but not absolute assurance on the reliability of the subject matter
Limited Assurance and Review Engagement
limited assurance is the level of assurance obtained where engagement risk is reduced to an acceptable level and the evidence gathered is at least sufficient for the practitioner to conclude and provide a level of assurance that is likely to enhance the intended users’ confidence about the financial statements
review engagement in which the practitioner does adequate work to provide limited assurance