IPOL midterm Flashcards
(194 cards)
Defining politics
activity where people make, preserve, amend rules under which they live
Anti-politics
Anti-politics describes a sentiment or movement rejecting traditional political institutions, often due to disillusionment with the political elite or bureaucracy. It emerged with populist ideologies in the 20th century. The relevance lies in its ability to fuel populist movements that challenge democratic norms and government accountability.
Politics as public affairs
Politics as public affairs refers to the activities and decisions that concern the community or state, often focusing on governance, lawmaking, and citizenship.
- public=political-> institutions responsible for the organization of community life, paid with taxes, government courts, police, army.
- private=not political: funded individually, for own interests rather than for the society, family, private business, trade unions, clubs= civil society
Politics should be separated from private life!
“the personal is the political”
Feminists argue that “the personal is political,” challenging the traditional separation between public (political) and private (personal) spheres. This concept emerged in second-wave feminism, emphasizing how personal experiences, particularly regarding gender roles, are shaped by political power structures. It highlights the need for a broader understanding of politics, including gender, domestic labour, and social inequalities.
Politics as power
- struggle over scarce resources and power is the means through which the struggle is conducted
- power structured relationships, arrangements whereby a group controls another group
Lukes 3 dimensions!
Politics is all!
Constructivism
Constructivism is an international relations theory emphasizing how social structures, ideas, and identities shape state behaviour and the international system. It originated in the late 20th century as a response to realism and liberalism. Its relevance lies in understanding the non-material aspects of global politics, like culture, norms, and identity.
Postcolonialism
Postcolonialism critically examines colonialism’s lasting impacts on societies, politics, and global power dynamics. It emerged after World War II, as formerly colonized nations gained independence, and scholars like Frantz Fanon and Edward Said explored these themes. Its relevance lies in addressing race, identity, and inequality issues in the global order.
Behaviourism
Behaviourism is an approach to the study of politics as an arena focuses on observable behaviour rather than subjective beliefs or feelings. It emerged in the mid-20th century, influenced by psychology and the desire for more empirical, measurable studies of political actions. Behaviourism’s relevance is seen in its contribution to the empirical analysis of voting patterns, political participation, and decision-making.
Positivism
Positivism is a philosophy that emphasizes the use of scientific methods to study the social world, based on the assumption that objective knowledge can be derived from empirical observation. Auguste Comte introduced the concept in the 19th century. It’s relevant for promoting systematic data collection and analysis in political science, laying the foundation for disciplines like behaviorism.
Rational-choice theory
Rational-choice theory is an approach to the study of politics as an arena posits that individuals decide by rationally weighing the costs and benefits to maximize their advantage. It has roots in economics and was applied to political science in the mid-20th century. The relevance of this theory is evident in its ability to explain voting behaviour, political negotiations, and policy choices through self-interest and strategic calculations.
Institutionalism
Institutionalism is an approach to the study of politics as an arena that emphasizes the role of formal institutions, such as laws and political structures, in shaping political behaviour. Its origins date back to the early 20th century, but it gained renewed attention with the development of “new institutionalism” in the 1980s. Its relevance shows how institutions, not just individual actions, can influence long-term political outcomes.
Politics as an arena
Politics as an arena views political life as taking place in distinct institutional spaces, like parliaments, courts, or governments. This concept highlights the locations where power struggles and debates over public policy happen. Understanding how different political actors come together in a formalized setting to influence outcomes is relevant.
Politics as compromise and consensus
This view defines politics as a process in reaching agreements and settling differences, often through negotiation. Its origins can be linked to liberal democratic thought, particularly the work of political theorists like John Locke. It’s relevant for highlighting how democratic institutions function through compromise to maintain social order and stability.
Post-positivism
Post-positivism critiques the idea that social sciences can be studied with the same objectivity as the natural sciences, acknowledging that power dynamics and subjectivity influence knowledge. Emerging in the late 20th century, post-positivism highlights the importance of context, meaning, and the role of ideologies in research. It is relevant for challenging traditional methodologies and advocating for a more nuanced understanding of political phenomena.
Comparison: Feminism vs. Marxism – Politics as a Process
Feminism views politics as a process rooted in personal and structural power dynamics, particularly concerning gender inequality. Feminist theories, especially from second-wave feminism, argue that the personal is political, meaning that broader political structures shape everyday experiences (like gender roles or domestic life). Feminists view political processes as crucial for challenging patriarchal systems, advocating for inclusion, and transforming society through intersectional and inclusive policies.
Marxism interprets politics as a process driven by class struggle and the material conditions of society. According to Marxist theory, political processes are an expression of the economic base, with the ruling class (bourgeoisie) maintaining control over the state apparatus to perpetuate capitalism. Marxists see politics as a revolutionary process where the working class (proletariat) will eventually overthrow the capitalist system and establish a classless society.
Comparison:
While feminism and Marxism see politics as a process influenced by power and inequality, feminism focuses on gender and intersectional struggles, while Marxism centres on economic class conflict. Feminism seeks to reform or transform various structures, whereas Marxism aims to completely overhaul economic systems through revolution. Both aim to redistribute power but focus on different primary axes of oppression.
Ideology
Ideology is a coherent set of beliefs, values, and ideas that shape political, social, and economic systems, guiding behaviour and policy. It includes explicit political doctrines (e.g., liberalism, Marxism) and implicit cultural or social assumptions. Ideology originated in the Enlightenment as a concept to understand human belief systems, and its relevance lies in its power to mobilize movements, justify authority, and explain the social world.
All ideologies, therefore:
(1) offer an account of the existing order, usually in the form of a ‘world-view’
(2) provide a model of a desired future, a vision of the Good Society
(3) outline how political change can and should be brought about.
Comparison: Marxist vs. Conservative Approach to Ideology
Marxism views ideology as a tool the ruling class uses to maintain its dominance over the working class. In Marxist theory, ideology masks capitalism’s true exploitative nature by promoting beliefs that justify the status quo (e.g., meritocracy, individualism). Originating from Karl Marx’s analysis of capitalism in the 19th century, the relevance of this view is that ideology is seen as part of the superstructure that reflects and sustains the economic base, preventing the working class from realizing their exploitation (false consciousness). Marxists aim to expose these ideologies and replace them with revolutionary socialist ideas.
Conservatism views ideology as guiding principles or traditions that provide stability and continuity to society. Conservatives often reject radical change, emphasizing the importance of established institutions, cultural values, and social hierarchies. This approach, originating from thinkers like Edmund Burke in response to the French Revolution, values ideology for its ability to maintain social order and preserve the wisdom of past generations. Conservatives see ideology not as an illusion or manipulation but as a necessary framework to support a well-functioning, stable society.
Comparison:
While Marxists view ideology as a tool of oppression that serves the ruling class by disguising social inequalities, conservatives view ideology as a positive force that maintains societal order and continuity. Marxists argue that ideologies must be overthrown for revolutionary change, whereas conservatives believe stable ideologies rooted in tradition are essential to avoid chaos and uphold social cohesion. In essence, Marxism sees ideology as a control mechanism, while conservatism sees it as a source of stability.
Classical liberalism
Classical liberalism advocates for individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and the protection of private property. It emerged in the 17th and 18th centuries with thinkers like John Locke and Adam Smith. Its relevance lies in shaping modern democratic institutions and capitalist economies, emphasizing personal freedom and the rule of law.
Modern liberalism
Modern liberalism expands classical liberalism by advocating for government intervention to promote social justice, equality, and welfare. It emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as a response to the social inequalities caused by industrial capitalism. Its relevance is seen in creating welfare states, social safety nets, and progressive policies.
Neoliberalism
Neoliberalism emphasizes free markets, deregulation, privatization, and reducing the state’s role in economic affairs. It gained prominence in the 1970s and 1980s with leaders like Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Neoliberalism’s relevance lies in its influence on globalization, economic policies, and the rise of market-driven societies.
The New Right
- Economic Liberalism: Favoring deregulation, lower taxes, and privatization of state-owned enterprises.
- Social Conservatism: Promoting traditional family values, national sovereignty, and a tough stance on law and order.
- Anti-Welfare State: Criticizing welfare programs for creating dependency and advocating for personal responsibility and limited government intervention in social welfare. ce pula
Neoconservatism
Neoconservatism advocates for a strong national defence, a moral foreign policy, and the promotion of democracy abroad, often through military intervention. It originated in the US during the 1960s as a reaction against the New Left and the perceived moral decline of liberalism. Its relevance is seen in US foreign policy, particularly during the George W. Bush administration.
Classical Marxism
Classical Marxism, based on the works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, views society through the lens of class struggle, with the ultimate goal of achieving a classless, communist society. Originating in the 19th century during the Industrial Revolution, its relevance lies in its critique of capitalism and its influence on socialist movements and revolutions, including the Russian Revolution.
Neo-Marxism
Neo-Marxism extends classical Marxist analysis by incorporating critiques of culture, ideology, and politics, particularly the role of the media and state in maintaining capitalism. It emerged in the mid-20th century with thinkers like the Frankfurt School. Neo-Marxism’s relevance lies in its ability to explain power structures in modern capitalist societies beyond just economic factors.