IR WEEK 1 Flashcards

1
Q

describe ways of knowing

A

scientific method, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, trial and error, authority, tradition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

includes deduction and induction in systematic empirical and controlled analysis

A

scientific method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

gather facts and observations without preconceived notions, facts about a sample leads to conclusions about about a whole

A

inductive reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

start with a premise or known scientific principle, tie that premise in with other observations and make a conclusion

A

deductive reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

keep trying until something works

A

trial and error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

turn to an expert

A

authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

we accept certain truths as givens

A

tradition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 major parts of the research continuum

A

Descriptive, exploratory, experimental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the researcher attempts to describe a group of individuals on a set of variables, to document their characteristics

A

descriptive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

researcher examines a phenomenon of interest and explores how it relates to other factors (find relationships)

A

exploratory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

compares two or more conditions (determines cause and effect)

A

experimental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

5 major phases of the research process

A
  1. identify the research question
  2. design the study
  3. carry out methods
  4. data analysis
  5. communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

enough evidence accumulates to discredit an existing theory; may cause a change in perspective

A

paradigm shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List and describe the 7 parts of a primary research article

A

Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, References

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

overview and purpose

A

abstract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

statement of the problem; specific purpose and hypothesis

A

introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

study design; data analysis and procedures

A

methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

narrative description of statistical outcomes

A

results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

interpretation of statistical outcomes

A

discussion and conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

technical assistant; funding source

A

acknowledgments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

all references cited in articles

A

references

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

synthesizes the data from multiple research studies and provides an argument or interpretation of the state of the field

A

review paper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

data sets are split and published separately instead of being presented in unified way

A

salami science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

a characteristic that can be manipulated or observed an that can take on different values, either quantitatively or qualitatively

A

variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
variables that might change in response to some intervention
dependent
25
condition, intervention or characteristic that will predict or cause a given outcome
independent variable
26
declarative statement that predicts relationships between independent and dependent variables in a specific population
hypothesis
27
alternative/research hypothesis
best guess answer to the research question; the expectation that is to be tested
28
null hypothesis
opposite of the research hypothesis; challenging the alternative hypothesis.
29
non directional hypothesis
no indication of change, higher or lower
30
directional hypothesis
predicting that something is either going to go higher, lower, or stay the same
31
the larger group to which research results are generalized
population
32
researcher chooses a subgroup of the population; reference group for estimating characteristics or drawing conclusions about the population
sample
33
individuals selected for a sample over-represent or under-represent certain population attributes that relate to the study variables
sampling bias
34
factors that preclude or prevent someone from being a subject
those with conditions/ diseases additional to the disease under study extreme ages certain disabilities or deficits that can affect how they can participate
35
factors of inclusion; population that qualifies someone as a subjec
gender disease state having particular treatment only certain symptoms
36
every unit has equal chance of having some of the characteristics throughout the population. The sample should be representative of the population
random sampling (probability sampling)
37
groups should be equivalent. differences between groups have been distributed as a function of chance alone
random assignment
38
the difference between average (statistics) and population averages (parameters); should be due to chance, not intentional error or bias
sampling error
39
experiment requirement through which change is observed. If we observe a change in the treatment group but not the control, we can attribute the change to the treatment.
control group
40
factors that contaminate the independent variable so that separate effects of the variable are obscured
extraneous variables
41
not measured in the study but can have confounding effects
lurkers
42
either the subjects are unaware of treatment type but the researcher knows or vice versa
single blinding
43
neither subjects or investigators know the identity of treatment groups until after data are collected or analyzed
double blinding
44
List the three essential characteristics of an experiment
1. Independent variable manipulated by researcher 2. A control group must be incorporated into the design 3. Subjects must be randomly assigned to groups
45
participants knowledge of treatment status or the investigators expectations can influence performance or reporting of outcomes
experimental bias
46
every person in the population has an equal chance of being chosen; sample should be representative of the population
random sampling
47
convenience sampling chosen on basis of availability. Ex: asking for volunteers by posting signs or advertisements
non-probability sampling
48
Explain why statistics are important in research
Application of mathematical methods to research conclusions about the world made from observations (experiments) Allows us to make accurate inferences from our incomplete observations
49
an educated guess, a process of inferring features of a population by looking at a small sample Address the questions of the likelihood that an observed difference between two groups could have arisen by chance
inferential statistics
50
describe data only (does not manipulate or compare data) Measures of central tendency Measures of variability
descriptive statistics
51
numbers that tend to cluster around the middle of a set of values
measures of central tendency
52
the score that occurs most frequently in a distribution
mode
53
the value above which there are as many scores as below it. Divides a rank-order distribution into 2 equal halves
median
54
(X-bar) sum of a set of numbers divided by the number of scores, n
mean
55
an observation that falls well above or well below the overall bulk of the data
outliers
56
difference between largest value and the smallest value. Only uses the largest and smallest observations ignoring the rest of the data
range
57
the typical value of how far the data falls from the mean, by summarizing the deviations from the mean
standard deviation
58
Statistical inference is an educated guess, a process of inferring features of a population by looking at a small sample; addresses questions of likelihood
inferential statistics
59
choosing of samples as representatives of the entire population
sampling
60
the distribution obtained by computing the statistic for a large number of samples drawn from the same population
sample distribution
61
FALSE POSITIVE when we conclude that a real difference exists, when the differences are in fact due to chance.
type 1 error (alpha)
62
FALSE NEGATIVE when we conclude that the differences are due to chance when the samples are truly different. | calling the results not statisitically significant when they really are
type 2 error (beta)
63
consists of arbitrary labels with no implied order; unranked; categorical | can be numbered but numbers have no significance
nominal data
64
consists of numerical ranked data that is ranked according to some criterion; each rank is different from the others, but the differences might not be equal. Ex: pain ratings, (on a scale of 1-10)
ordinal data
65
consists of ranked data with intervals between each other being equal but with no meaningful zero point ex: IQ scores
interval data
66
like interval data but zero point is meaningful; highest level of measurement. Ex: most lab values, no negative values, height, weight, age
ratio data
67
acquisition of new knowledge for its own sake, without reference to potential practical use
basic research
68
directed toward solving immediate practical problems with functional applications and testing theories that direct practice
applied research
69
structured process of investigating facts and theories in medicine exploring connections, improving patient care
clinical research
70