Jon Hanley Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

AP2

A

Clathrin adaptor
4x adaptin subunits

PICK1 binds alpha appendage
Clathrin binds beta appendage

Competitively competes with NSF for binding to GluA2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

GST Pulldown

A

To see whether 2 proteins can interact (in a test-tube)
Can use to identify binding site

Fusion protein plasmid - GST + protein 1
Plasmid taken up by bacteria - expresses the fusion protein
Bacteria are good at making GST proteins, therefore good at making fusion proteins
Bind GST fusion protein to glutathione-coated agarose beads
Incubate with protein of interest (2)
Centrifuge
SDS-Page + Western blot - AB protein of interest (2)
2nd AB w/ chemiluminescence enzyme
Expose to photographic film to detect light - dark band = protein of interest

Ensure ABs are validated
Good for testing optimal conditions for a reaction to occur
ie. Buffer - with/without ATP, b-SNAP etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Co-immunoprecipitation

A

To see if 2 proteins interact in native tissue

Protein of interest bound to AB on sepharose bead covered in protein A/G
Incubate in brain lysate
Centrifuge
SDS-Page + Western blotting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Immunocytochemistry co-localisation

A

To see if 2 proteins are in the same place within a cell

Fix with formaldehyde (in order to access IC proteins)
Primary AB for protein 1 w/ fluorescence dye
Primary AB for protein 2 w/ fluorescence dye
Confocal microscopy - overlap, different colour = co-localising

Confocal = limited to the wavelength of light ~180 nm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Transfection

A
  • Virus ie. Sindbus, lentivirus = engineer to encode virus; encourage viral DNA to incorporate into host cell’s DNA
  • Lipofection = liposome associates with DNA encoding protein of interest; forms a DNA-lipid complex; lipid fuses with PM, releases DNA
  • Biolistics = DNA-coated gold bullets
    Control - gold w/ no DNA; ensure gold is inert
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Show that LTD is mediated by clathrin-mediated endocytosis

A

Disrupt amphiphysin-dynamin

Amphiphysin associates with the neck of the clathrin-coated pit, recruits dynamin (GTPase) via SH3 domains which pinches off the newly formed vesicle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Memory requiring LTD

A

Novel object recognition memory = perihinal cortex

Blocked w/ in vivo expression of AP2-GluA2 peptide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Memory requiring LTP

A

Spatial object memory = hippocampus
Forgetting = GluA2-internalisation
-promoted natural forgetting with peptide: GluA2-NSF
-prevent long-term natural forgetting with peptide: GluA2-AP2 (no endocytosis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Promote endocytosis

A

Peptide to disrupt: GluA2-NSF

NSF stabilises AMPARs at the synapse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In vivo memory tasks

A

Disrupt GluA2-AP2

  • memory disrupted in the perihinal cortex (novel recognition memory)
  • speed up natural forgetting process in the hippocampus (spatial memory -object location memory)

Disrupt GluA2-NSF (stabilise AMPARs at the synapse)
-prevent natural long-term memory loss

Forgetting in the hippocampus occurs due to GluA2-containing AMPARs being internalised!
The persistence of learning depends on the maintenance of steady-state level of synaptic GluA2-containing AMPARs = requires interaction with NSF-GluA2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Disrupt GluA2-NSF

A

GluA2-NSF interaction discovered via yeast 2-hybrid scanning

Promote endocytosis (NSF cannot stabilise AMPARs at the synapse)

Occlude LTD - therefore involved in mechanism of LTD!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disrupt GluA2-AP5

A

Inhibit GluA2-endocytosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Endosomal markers

A

Early endosome = EEA1
Recycling endosomes = Rab11, Syntaxin13
Late endosomes = LAMP1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which interactions compete for the same binding site?

A

GluA2-NSF (stabilise AMPARs at synapse)

GluA2-AP2 (involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What amino acids do kinases require to recognise a phosphorylation site?
Example!

A

Lysine residue

ie. LTD = phosphorylation @ Ser880 on GluA2
Block P from occuring my mutating lysine resiue (K–>A) = reduced LTD
Need phosphorylation at Ser880 for FULL LTD to occur!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Phosphorylation of Ser880

A

P @ Ser880 on GluA2 occurs during LTD

By PKC:
For = phorbol esters increase phosphospecific AB staining
Against = PKC inhibition (ie. CalC/BIS) does not stop P-Ser880 or LTD from occuring
Could be - multiple kinases act to P-Ser880!

Inhibit phosphorylation = reduce LTD
Capacitance studies = GluA2 is recycled faster to the synapse (PICK1 cannot bind GluA2 + retain from the synapse)

Hypothesis: PICK1 binds PKC
-interaction brings PKC close to GluA2 to P-Ser880 - PICK1 acts as a scaffold for PKC
BUT - PICK1 K/O - P-Ser880 still occurs!

Future - try inhibiting PICK1-PKC binding site (avoid problems associated with knocking-out proteins)

17
Q

PICK1-GluA2 = Ca relationship

A

Peak ~ 15uM

Biphasic - could explain how increasing [Ca] results in either LTD or LTP
Smaller [Ca] increase = LTD
Larger [Ca] increase = LTP

***timings are also important;
LTD = prolonged, modest increase
LTP = transient, large increase

It is possible that a Ca-sensing protein will respond to specific patterns of Ca accumulation over time

Deletion of NTD (glutamate + aspartate aa) = no biphasic relationship - no LTD occurring - need Ca sensor to trigger LTD
Need PICK1 to bind Ca (+ dimerise) in order to drive internalisation of AMPARs - therefore no LTD can occur

18
Q

Ca binding PICK1

A

Binds to region near NTD
Acidic amino acids = glutamate + aspartate
Circular dichromism studies (with/without Ca bound) + thermal denaturation studies = decrease in intramolecular bonds + destabilisation of tertiary interactions
Expose BAR domains = can dimerise

DIFFERENT TO EXO = proteins involved contain C2 domains!

19
Q

BAR domains

A

Highly conserved dimerisation domains - involved in membrane dynamics

Contains +vely charged lysine residues - mediate binding to the -vely charged phospholipid heads

ie. PICK1, amphiphysin

20
Q

GluA2-NSF

A

Interaction stabilises GluA2-containing AMPARs at the surface

NSF binds to a juxtamembrane region of GluA2
Co-factor = alpha-SNAP (binds to PICK1’s BAR domain)
SNAPs act as a physical connection with NSF and PICK1!

The mechanical force of ATP hydrolysis can be transferred, via SNAPs, to dissociate PICK1-GluA2 = ‘rotational shearing’ effect
It is unclear whether PICK1 dimers dissociate into monomers = maybe try FRET experiments???

GluA2-NSF interaction

  • Enhanced via nitrolyslation!!!
  • Ca-sensitive: basal Ca favours binding; high [Ca] blocks interaction (LTD) - allows PICK1-mediated endo to occur

~15uM
-optimal GluA2-PICK1 binding
-inhibits GluA2-NSF
(remember NSF competes with AP2 binding to GluA2)

Inhibiting GluA2-NSF = occludes LTD (see a rundown in EPSC prior to LFS)

21
Q

LTD

A

P @ Ser880 on GluA2 by PKC

Inhibition of GluA2-NSF

22
Q

Experimentally inducing LTP

A

High frequency stimulation/theta burst stimulation

Glycine

23
Q

Experimentally inducing LTD

A

Low frequency stimulation

NDMA (activate extra-synaptic receptors)

24
Q

Co-factor to NSF

A

Alpha-SNAP
Deletion of alpha-SNAP = embryonic death

NSF+SNAP regulate PICK1-GluA2 interactions AND they regulate the SNARE complex

Beta-SNAP = Block effect - stops NSF from working

25
Alpha-SNAP
Co-factor to NSF | Deletion = embryonic death
26
Beta-SNAP
Blocks effect | Over-expression = enhances endocytosis
27
How is actin involved in LTD?
Actin polymerisation occurs to generate forces to push vesicles away from the PM = mechanical force NOT mediated by Arp2/3 because PICK1 inhibits!
28
PICK1 interactions: time scale
PICK1-GluA2 = Ca-dependent (15uM) + P@Ser880-dependent -Target AMPARs to endocytic zones PICK1-AP2 = calcineurin-dependent - Interaction disrupts PICK1-GluA2 - Target PICK1 to clathrin-coated neck PICK1-dynamin - PICK1 promotes dynamin polymerisation (pinch off forming vesicle) - PICK1 causes a dose-dependent increase in dynamin polymerisation (high-speed sedimentation assay) GluA1 --> AP2/dynamin at the same time BUT - could be due to limited temporal resolution Hypothesise: AP2 and then dynamin: -PICK1-AP2 is dynamin-independent but PICK1-dynamin is AP2-dependent -dynamin polymerisation occurs at a late stage in clathrin-mediated endocytosis PICK1-GluA1 markedly before PICK1-AP2 Suggests - PICK1-GluA2 interaction has a faster time course compared to calcineurin-dependent PICK1-AP2
29
Roles of PICK1
Increase GluA2-containing AMPAR internalisation Retain GluA2 away from the synapse Inhibit Arp2/3 mediated branched actin polymerisation (required for spine enlargement)
30
SNARE complex
2x SNAP-25 Syntaxin Synaptobrevin Interact via short TMDs; form tight bundles via twisting Involves coiled-coil motifs
31
Newly inserted AMPARs
The newly inserted AMPARs come from REs Mutate Rab11/Syntaxin13 - disrupt LTS from occuring Why is short term maintenance disrupted? Biotin/NA/BoTx studies - initial LTS is due to the lateral diffusion of AMPARs in the extra-synaptic space - mutated REs should not affect this!
32
LTP Subunits
GluA1-containing AMPARs inserted GluA2 kept away from the synapse via PICK1-GluA2 interaction ~20min (high Ca-permeable synapse) As [Ca] increases, PICK1-GluA2 interaction decreases - GluA2 inserted into the synapse
33
LTP Subunits - Experimentally Investigate
1. 2. Live-imaging of pH-luorin tagged GluA1/A2 Photobleach synapse - see insertion + diffusion of GluA1 <10 min - no insertion of GluA2 3. Sensitivity to philanthrotoxin Before: LTP induction (NDMA-Ca-influx) - no maintenance/expression of LTP During: LTP induction - blocks LT maintenance - need Ca-P AMPARs to maintain LTP After: LTP unaffected - GluA1 replaced by GluA2 AMPARs
34
TARPs
Ancillary subunit to AMPARs PSD-95 binds to PDZ domain on TARPs Triple knock-out TARP mutant = died at birth, never moved Highly regulated by phosphorylation - Mutant which mimics P-state = increase in synaptic activity - De-P TARP = reduction in surface AMPARs Also regulated by: PHOSPHOLIPIDS
35
PSD-95
MAGUK protein Contains 3x PDZ domains Over-express in hippocampal neurones = occlude LTP No. of PSD-95 @ a synapse = upregulated by LTP/LTD + regulated by independent mechanisms Restricts lateral movement of AMPARs - move around less when associated with PSD-95 clusters (co-localisation studies)
36
LTP
Increase in 'slots' - increase in PSD-95 at the synapse
37
Slot hypothesis
Induce LTP - insertion of GluA1-AMPARs More slot proteins = more positions for AMPARs at the synapse Slot proteins stay at the synapse whilst AMPARs are internalised (GluA1-C) and inserted (GluA2-C) Number of synaptic AMPARs = number of slot proteins
38
Is lateral diffusion necessary for LTP?
``` STP = Lateral diffusion of extra-synaptic AMPARs LTP = exocytosis of RRP of vesicles containing AMPARs - then laterally diffuse across ``` In vivo cross-linking of AMPARs via ABs - IgG against GluA2 = limited surface diffusion - Injected into dorsal hippocampus - Marked decrease in EPSP following HFS - Impaired formation of contextual fear memories
39
RRP
Readily releasable pool of vesicles Primed vesicles = competent to undergo AP-induced fusion Primed release pool size reduces due to depletion of the pool during LTP Important proteins for priming = Munc13