Kant Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Summary

A
  • it deontological: concerned with actions and whether it is right or wrong and not the outcomes/consequences
  • its absolutist: it treats every situation equally, either right or wrong
  • categorical imperative: helps us to know which action are obligatory and which are forbidden
  • intrinsically good: something that is good in itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Maxim

A

another word for moral rules, determined by reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Introduction

KANT (1724)

A
  • Kant believed that moral knowledge was known through reason, not experience and its synthetic. (Priori)
  • For Kant, good people always follow the moral law they do this because they have a good will and do their duty.
  • To him, moral law is something we must categorically follow. Universal maxims- fixed rules that must always apply
  • Humans are free to pursue the summun bonum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

key questions when looking at this unit:

A
  • should emotion or reason guide moral choice?
  • are moral rules universal?
  • do people have intrinsic worth?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kant’s attempt to base morality on reason

A
  • Kant was part of the European enlightenment movement. An important goal Kant shared with other enlightenment thinkers was to bring religion and ethics within the boundary of reason, not of faith.
  • If ethics could be based on reason, Kant conceived that a harmonious society of rationality would be established
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The summum bonum

A
  • HUMANS ARE FREE TO PURSUE THE SUMMUM BONUM - the place where our happiness and our virtue (good actions through doing our duty) come together.
  • Kant rejects empirical evidence - as it can be flawed
  • however, he focused rather on reason and logic instead
  • we know what is right/ wrong not by relying on our intuitions or facts about the world, but by using reason and logic
  • Kant’s theory is deontological because it is based on duty (to act morally is to do ones duty and obey the moral laws.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ABOUT KANT (1724)

A
  • Wrote many works including, GROUNDWORK OF METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785), CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON, CRITIQUES OF PURE REASONS
  • highly influential German philosopher
  • Lived during the peak of the enlightenment era
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

THE ENLIGHTENMENT ERA & WHY ITS IMPORTANT

CONTEXT:A03

A
  • Politics/ science were reoriented during the course of the 18th century
  • also known as the age of reason was an intellectual and cultural movement in the eighteenth century that emphasized reason over superstition and science over blind faith.
  • PEOPLE WERE MORE AWARE OF THINKING
  • allow humans to revolt and gain more freedom (challenges authority)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duty & The Good Will

A
  • For Kant, a Good will is one which has the right intention when performing moral actions.
  • Our duty is ‘To do good to others,… it’s our duty’ - Kant
  • We should leave out personal feelings/desires and just do ‘duty for duty’s sake’.
  • For example, if it is our duty to give money to charity, we should do it because it is our duty, not because we want to or because we feel empathy.

Kant establishes specific duties:
- to strive for self-perfection/the wellbeing of others
- to pursue the greater good - duty not to make false promises, as truthfulness is the foundation of human society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MAXIM: Categorical imperative

How we perceive the moral law?

1st formulation: universaility

A
  • something you must always do = no matter the situation
  • universal laws that rational beings should follow.
  • Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law’ = Our moral behaviour must be consistent throughout our life
  • He uses the example of lying. Kant thinks lying cannot be universalised because if everyone were to lie, there would be no such thing as truth anymore.
  • Shows that it is not universalisable and any act that is not universalised is self-defeating = therefore it is our duty to not do the wrong thing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

summary of categorical imperative

A

Kants states there 1 categorical imperatives , with 3 formulations:
1. Only act in a way that you will to be universal
2. never treat human beings as a means to an end
3. Always act as if you are a member of the kingodm of ends

  • An action must pass these formulations to be good, but it must also be done with the right intention.
  • These formulations allow you to figure out what your duty – “duty for duty’s sake” – out of respect for the moral law.
  • Doing your duty because of your personal feelings is not morality = That would be engaging in a hypothetical imperative – doing your duty if you feel like it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MAXIM: Categorical imperative
2nd. formulation

HUMANITY

A
  • Kant says: ’Always treat humanity and the ends of itself never merely as a means.’
  • Don’t use people. Everyone has their own end (goals) in life so if you treat them as if they are only a means to your end then you are failing to acknowledge that they have their own end, which disregards their intrinsic value and freedom.
  • Examples of such disregard include marital abuse, human trafficking, and financial exploitation.
  • Kant’s ethics, emphasising universal rules and the supremacy of human life, influenced Catholic moral thought, particularly evident in the writings of Karol Wojtyla (later Pope John Paul II).
  • Wojtyla’s concept of dignity aligns with Kantian principles, emphasising that using a person as a means to an end violates their natural rights and dignity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MAXIM: 3rd formulation: Kingdom of end

categorical imperative

A
  • not a test like the first 2 but a reminder to always act on the moral law.
  • In a world often perceived as selfish and disregard others, Kant’s prohibits adopting rules based on universal selfishness.
  • Kant emphasises the inherent worth and dignity of each individual as rational beings capable of moral reasoning.
  • He rejects the notion of adopting moral rules that everyone should act selfishly, as it contradicts the idea of treating others as ends in themselves.
  • Kant envisions the “kingdom of ends,” where universal laws are based on respect for human dignity and the recognition of each person’s intrinsic moral worth.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hypothetical imperatives

Kant rejects

A
  • doing your duty to achieve something else
  • E.g. you should not lie if you want to appear honest. Kant thinks this is not genuine morality, since morality shouldn’t depend on **personal desires outcomes **
  • He thinks that human reason has the ability to discover the ‘categorical imperative’ instead
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Problems with Kant

A
  • Too focused on duty, he disregards the outcome of the situations = the complexities of life – universalisability cannot work as no two situations are the same.
  • he ignores the moral value of emotions: If you do an action because of your emotions, then that’s not moral goodness. = For example, would you tell a known murderer where his victim was? (Kant says we have to.)
    It does not account for any particular duty we may have for certain people (e.g. family).
  • It does not account for times when two absolutes clash.
  • Some would say that sometimes human life has to be sacrificed to stop others or more people being killed or suffering.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sartre critique to Kant

A
  • The duties may clash: = its too unrealistic
  • Sartre gave the example of a soldier could either go to war to defend their country, or they could stay home and look after their sick parent.
  • Both actions are universalisable and neither treats people as mere means, therefore both actions are their duty according to Kant’s ethics.
  • Yet, they cannot do both – the duties clash – so they actually cannot both be a duty.
  • So, Kant’s ethics doesn’t tell us our duty.
17
Q

Strengths of Kant

A
  • It is universal so everyone is treated equally and given equal value.
  • Human life is given particular value.
    You have particular rules to follow - you know where you are with the theory.
  • It promotes good will, which is beneficial for society
  • There are no references to the future or to consequences, which cannot be known.
18
Q

Three Postulates of Pure Practical Reason

psa: unlikely to need this

A

A postulate is something you have to assume to be true in order for basic reasoning about something; Kant postulated three things that were necessary for his theory to work:

  • free will
  • immortality/afterlife
  • God
19
Q
  1. Immorality
A
  • Kantian ethics envisions a perfect future where individuals consistently act according to moral duty, such as stopping to help strangers in need.
  • This perfect world is characterized by the “summum bonum,” the highest good, where duty is aligned with actions that promote happiness for all.
  • However, achieving this highest good in the present world is challenging, as individuals may face hardships when striving to do their duty.
  • In some cases, individuals may even sacrifice their own lives for the sake of others, highlighting the moral complexities and potential consequences of ethical actions.
  • Kant proposes the postulation of the immortality of the soul to ensure that correct happiness can be attained beyond this life, allowing for the realisation of the highest good in the afterlife.
20
Q
  1. Freedom and the summum bonum
A
  • Kant’s ethics revolves around the postulate of freedom, also known as autonomy, which asserts that human beings possess self-directed, autonomous wills.
  • Freedom is considered by Kant as the highest form of life {summon bonumm), allowing individuals to choose the moral law over instinct or desire.
  • In moral decision-making, the worth of an absolutely good will lies in its freedom from external influences, enabling individuals to act according to universal principles
  • Without freedom, individuals cannot exercise moral responsibility, as their actions would be restricted or controlled by external forces.
21
Q
  1. God
A
  • Kant acknowledged that virtuous acts might not always result in immediate happiness but believed in acting as if moral actions ultimately lead to appropriate distributions of happiness.
  • His belief in immortality and heavenly reward ensured the proper arrangement of happiness, acknowledging human striving.
  • Kant, a Lutheran Christian himself, influenced contemporary Christians, especially regarding human life’s value and dignity.
  • Some Christians criticise Kant for prioritising human reason over biblical revelation in moral matters.
22
Q

Is Kantian ethics a helpful method of moral decision-making?

A
  • Kant’s categorical imperative is designed to prevent the formation of immoral moral maxims.
  • Testing Kant’s theory, for instance with the maxim of lying promises, reveals flaws in certain maxims when universalised, rendering them immoral.
  • While some examples, like suicide, are debated, Kant’s imperative generally opposes it, although it does not explicitly prohibit it.
  • Pojman questions Kant’s example regarding aiding others, proposing alternative maxims that achieve similar aims without breaking the categorical imperative.
  • Despite criticisms, Kant’s system aims to elevate human status and prevent selfish rule-making, offering advantages in creating moral rules.
23
Q

Is Kantian ethics so reliant on reason that it unduly rejects the importance of other factors, such as sympathy, empathy and love in moral decision-making?

A
  • Emotions play a crucial role in human experience, particularly in relationships with loved ones, often guiding us through challenging times.
  • Kant’s ethical theory appears detached from the emotional significance of these connections, as it does not prioritise saving loved ones over others in moral dilemmas.
  • Emotional responses, such as concern for the poor or compassion for someone in distress, often motivate moral actions, but Kant emphasises rationality over emotionality in decision-making.
  • Kant questions the morality of actions driven by emotions, as they may lead to corruption, or selfish aims, potentially resulting in a world where everyone acted solely on their emotions.
  • Morals, according to Kant, should transcend friendship loyalties and focus on justice, as emotions could compromise fairness and consistency in moral judgments.