L03-L05 Flashcards
(163 cards)
How are the brain and mind/consciousness related?
→ starting 4-5 years, children divide world into mental and physical things
→ major religions are almost all dualist, including Christianity, Islam, Hinduism
→ Cartesian Dualism – Mind: non-physical, non-extended (takes up no space); Body: physical, extended
what is the Interaction problem
most philosophers and scientists believe that there is only one kind of reality
Idealists in the interaction problem
mind is fundamental.
Problem: why and how appears a consistent physical world?
Neutral monoists in the interaction problem
mental and physical are two different ways to represent the same reality, which is neutral (neither physical nor mental)
Materialists in the interaction problem
- most popular among scientists – matter is fundamental
→ The Hard Problem
→ How to account for consciousness? How can matter give rise to mind?→ Easy problems: perception, learning, memory, attention
Massimo Pigliucci view of the hard problem
Hard Problem is an illusion
Patricia Churchland view of the hard problem
Impossible to decide in advance what is a hard and an easy problem. Will there be something left for consciousness once we understand the easy problems?
The Hard Problem
THOMAS NAGEL (1974): WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A BAT?
- If it makes sense to ask the question, What is it like to be X, then X is conscious.
- Bats live a very different life compared to humans
- Their conscious awareness will be based on totally different perceptions from humans
- Nagel argues it will be impossible to know what it’s like to be a bat because consciousness is subjective, a private experience (phenomenality)
→ like it is impossible for a dog to understand calculus, it is impossible for us to understand consciousness - Reductionists argue that the careful study of a bat’s brain and perceptual system would make it possible to discover what the experience of a bat is like
What is it like to be tracy? – scenario
- People vary considerably in their ability to discriminate colours
- In one experiment on colour discrimination Tracy is discovered she can see a colour that no other human can see
- For example when looking at ripe tomatoes, we only see red, but Tracy can distinguish two colours, one she calls “Red1”, the other she calls “Red2”
- She tried to teach others to see Red1 and Red2, but realized that humans are Red2 colourblind
- Red1 and Red2 are not two different shades of red, to tracy, Red1 and Red2 are as different as yellow and blue are to all of us
- Neuroscience investigations into Tracy’s ability revealed that her optical system can separate two groups of wavelengths in the red spectrum as acutely as we can sort out yellow from blue
- What kind of experience does Tracy have when she sees Red1 and Red2?
→ No amount of physical information about Tracy’s optical system will help us to find an answer to this question - Knowing all that concerns the physicality of Tracy will not be enough: clearly, knowing all this, is not knowing everything about Tracy
- It follows that reductionists will not be able to discover everything – something is left out
What is consciousness? – Investigating this, we have two options:
- Use consciousness itself to investigate itself
- Take ourselves out of the thing we wish to study
- as neuroscientists, we have to explain how the electrical firing of millions of neurons produces private, subjective, conscious experience
- this leads directly into the familiar territory of the dualistic MIND BODY PROBLEM
what is the mind body problem
In human experiences there are two different things that cannot be brought together: Our own (private) experience vs. The physical world
- Physical world is assumed to exist and we share it with others
- Our own experience of this world is:
→ inner, private, subjective experience of the physical world
→ its quality cannot be shared with anybody
David Chalmers’ view on the Hard Problem
- The Hard Problem is to explain how physical processes in the brain cause subjective experience
- It is the modern version of the mind-body problem
- There is an explanatory gap between the material brain and the subjective world experience
- In contrast to the hard problem, there are easy problems –> ex. perception, learning, memory, attention, sleeping vs. waking, etc.
what are the disagreements with the Hard Problem?
→ some claim that there is no Hard Problem
→ the easy problems are underestimated and the hard problem is an illusion;
→ will there be anything left to explain once we explain the easy problems?
what is qualia
- Philosophers often use the term “qualia” (singular “quale”) to refer to the introspectively accessible, phenomenal, private aspects of our mental lives
- Subject experiences have an ineffable subjective quality:
→ the redness of red
→ indescribable smell of turpentine - Some philosophers however claim that qualia do not exist at all but are an illusion
- Qualia are at the heart of the mind-body problem
quailia and understanding by mimicry:
- The natural sciences and the fine arts are portrayed as pari passu (latin: ranking equally) human faculties united in the quest to understand nature. Working together, they allow the human mind to reach the ultimate form of understanding – imitating nature
- Thus if qualia arise from mental activity, one way to understand what others are experiencing is generating similar activity by mimicry/simulation
IMPAIRING SIMULATION WITH FACIAL GEL MASK REDUCES ACCURACY
- Task is to recognize what facial expression you’ve seen before
- Take a face that can be angry or sad
- It morphs from one expression to another slowly
- Task is to identify the expression you’ve seen before
- In order to understand someone’s emotions, we generate an inner movie program that simulates making that face → simulating allows us to understand one another
- Data supports that understanding the inner reality of someone else “qualia” can be discovered through simulating
what are some of the many definitions of consciousness
- Consciousness is identical to the physical processes we can observe in the brain. Therefore, studying attention, learning, memory, perception, etc. will let us understand consciousness in the end. Consciousness is not an added something to these processes
- Consciousness is an illusion and does not exist
- Consciousness does exist and is an additional quality added to humans, and we have to understand the purpose of it – what does it allow us to do, this consciousness, that we could not do without it
what do Varela & Maturana argue about consciousness?
wherever there is life, there is consciousness. The related Gaia theory argues that our planet itself is a life form and thus endowed with consciousness
what does the integrated information theory of Tononi suggest?
all systems that integrate information have some level of consciousness
→ the level of integration of information can be calculated (Phi score). The more information is integrated, the higher the score, the higher the system’s level of consciousness
→ Humans integrate a lot of information, have a lot of consciousness (Hi-Phi). Ants integrate less information, have less consciousness.
→ Under this perspective AI systems have a form of consciousness, as well as DNA, and the universe itself
in psychology textbooks consciousness is discussed in terms of what?
attention, awareness, circadian rhythms, sleep, dreams, hypnosis, etc.
William James was the first to do what with the idea of consciousness?
describe it as a flow – functionalism opposed structuralism in this way
“Consciousness … does not appear to itself chopped up in bits. Such words as ‘chain’ and ‘train’ do not describe it fitly as it presents itself in the first instance. It is nothing joined; it flows. A ‘river’ or a ‘stream’ are the metaphors by which it is most naturally described.
discuss free will
- Free will is a “cultural and religious artifact” of christian philosophers to explain the primal fall from grace by Adam and Eve. If God is the cause of all things, the fall from grace would have been caused by God. This did not fit with the omnibenevolent view of God.
- Free will as a concept does not exist in Buddhism, which also assumes that the Self is an illusion
What did Freud argue about unconscious processes?
unconscious processes affect a person’s experience and behaviour, even though a person cannot report these. Freud argued that one can find evidence for these unconscious processes.
→ slips of the tongue
→ dreams
→ Rohrschach inkblot test
what is the “Self”?
- Elusive concept – we have an intuitive idea of what “Self” means, but there is no simple and commonly agreed upon definition.
- similar notions
→ Damasio (core and autobiographical self);
→ Gallagher (minimal and narrative self)