L2 - traits and stories Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

what are traits? for what are they used

A

words in natural language used to describe individual characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lexical hypothesis

A
  1. those personality characteristics that are important to a group of people will eventually become a part of that group’s language
  2. more important personality characteristics are more likely to be encoded into language in many words
  3. PCA of the covariance structure of traits can be used to extract the most important aspects or variation in a population
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If you do principal component analysis you get covariance of traits, explain what this means

A

you see that a number of components or big groupings of words covary together

e.g., needy, nervous, irritable and moody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

method for studying covariance patterns (3)

A
  1. take a large list of trait words in a language (from dictionaries)
  2. use a method to derive principle components on these traits
  3. arrive at a factor structure of 5 to 7
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain how principal component analysis reveals bigger and broader groups of traits

A
  • By looking at traits in a continuous spectrum (no abnormal vs normal)
  • There’s a degree of stability that can be observed in large populations
  • These are stable over time as well

e.g., you get covariance of needy. nervous, irritable, by analyzing these further you’d get OCEA traits –> then AMPD traits and then HiTOP groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

So we have an observable pattern over time, what are some remaining questions?

A
  • why do we so often find these 5-7 principal components in lexical studies across the world?
  • what is the reason for covariance between specific traits?
  • why do we find persistence? - consistency across time
  • why do we find pervasiveness? - consistency over situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

name 4 different interpretations of covariance structures (aka answers to the remaining questions)

these are not mutually exclusive

A
  1. trait realism
  2. situationism
  3. network stability
  4. stability in the performance of an actor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

trait realism + interpretation of Tellegen’s quote

A

explains the emergence of stable (persistent) traits
- personality traits seen as real, organismic (psychological, psychobiological structure) stable characteristics
- a trait gives rise to a range of behaviors that are related or similar (e.g., extraversion underlies behaviors like being talkative, expressing excitement etc.)
- traits express themselves in specific situations where they are relevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

trait realism: extraversion example

A
  1. Extraversion is thought to be a broad trait and includes general energy, general evaluation of parties and a general tendency to converse
  2. If you have the general tendency then you are more likely to feel energetic at a certain time or at a certain party, like it or have a conversation

–> So there’s an inclination for extraversion from which it follows that you’re likely to be energetic at a party, to like a party and to have a conversation at a party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A realist trait perspective: the big three

A

multidimensional personality questionnaire developed from the basic trait realist idea

three broad personality dimensions:
1. positive emotionality
2. negative emotionality
3. constraint

the idea: these are biological predispositions that we possess (evidence kind of so and so) and they cause certain traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

positive emotionality causes (4)

A
  • well-being
  • social closeness
  • achievement
  • social potency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

negative emotionality causes (3)

A
  • stress reactivity
  • alienation
  • aggression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

constraint is causes (3)

A

= a person’s tendency to inhibit impulses, behave cautiously, and follow rules or social norms
* harm avoidance
* control
* traditionalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

absorption

A

capacity to become fully immersed in sensory and imaginative experiences
- getting lost in music, art etc.
- highly imaginative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

trait realism: temperament big three infant behavior questionnaire

A

a similar multidimensional personality questionnaire akin to the big three but for infants

Three broad dimensions:
1. surgency (ap, vr, hip, sl, al, ps)
2. negative affectivity (sa, dil, fear, fr=falling reactivity -> rate of recovery from stress)
3. orienting/regulation capacity (cu, lip, do, so=soothability)

allows us to study the continuation of temperament into later personality traits
- e.g., surgency is found to be a predictor of later positive emotionality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

situationism + what to note

A

the whole idea of traits and their existence + their influence on behaviors is not tenable / defendable
-> denies the existence of traits completely

instead: At a single instance, the party (situational factor) itself is more influential than the trait (Extraversion) in determining the behavior

NOTE: we now know that across multiple instances there are observable trends (so lecturer thinks that this view is itself not tenable)

17
Q

Person or situation? (trait or situation?)

A

step 1: Evidence for situations
- people act very differently in different occasions

step 2: Evidence for persons
- people act very similar from one week to the next

answer –> step 3: both are correct
- traits are best regarded as person-specific distributions of certain states-of-mind and behaviors. Thus they indicate the likelihood of such states over a certain time-period
- these person-specific distributions are quite stable (personality)
- the specific outcomes at any particular moment vary a great deal (situationism)

18
Q

Network stability: traits upside down

A

traits develop over time into generalized networks of complex systems

  1. Interactions of particular acts, feelings, thoughts
  2. Give rise to covariance between them
  3. Resulting in generalized patterns
  4. And broad traits

Small dispositions accumulate over time and bidirectionally infuence one another -> generalized patterns

19
Q

example of network stability: extraversion

A
  1. I start having conversations at a party which makes me feel energetic
  2. Then this energetic feeling makes me like it
  3. This in turn results into a generalized pattern of “I liked that party” that is remembered by you so you go to another party which then is enjoyable as well
  4. Repeatedly experiencing that generalizes into other situations as well –> emergence of stable pattern
20
Q

stability in the performance of the actor

A

The cycle between actions and perceived reactions of others + own self-judgement determine stable character of an actor
The interactions themselves = influenced partly by genetic predispositions

21
Q

verhalenbank goals (6)

A
  • creating a scietific database of interviews on experiences of mental health and mental health care
  • developing new methods for analyzing these narratives
  • initiate possibilities for improving mental health care
  • creating educational material for students in mental health care
  • working against taboo and stigma
  • offering comofrt, strength and inspiration to fellow patients
22
Q

example of coding narratives: agency and communion

A

Agency:
existence of an organism as an individual

Communion:
participation of the individual in some larger organism of which the individual is a part of

these 2 are part of the agent and later, the author

23
Q

agency manifests itself in (8)

A
  • self-protection
  • self-assertion
  • self-expansion
  • formation of separations
  • isolation
  • alienation
  • aloneness
  • urge to master
24
Q

communion manifests itself in (6)

A
  • sense of being at one with other organisms
  • lack of separations
  • contact
  • openness
  • union
  • noncontractual cooperation
25
agency and communion correlation with OCEAN traits
agency: * extraversion * conscientiousness communion: * agreeableness
26
agentic values in life stories (4)
* self-mastery * status/victory * empowerment * achievenement/responsibility
27
communal values in life stories (4)
* love/friendship * dialogue * unity/togetherness * caring/help
28
In Naomi's narrative how do communal themes come up, what agentic ones?
agentic themes: "I learnt to be vulnerable, that my emotions are allowed to be there and how I can connect with others" from increasing communal themes, Naomi also improved on agentic ones (she found it important for herself to connect with others) we refer to these as themes because you develop to look for agency and communion they are not a predisposing character trait
29
what constitutes the core of personality psychopathology?
disturbances in self (agency) and interpersonal functioning (communion) disturbances in self: * identity * self-direction disturbances in communion: * empathy * intimacy --> found in the DSM-5
30
motivational coding schemes
* agency * communion * growth goals - degree to which the protagonist makes intentional efforts to guide their development in a personally meaningful direction, oriented towards personal growth
31
affective coding schemes
* contamination - moving from a good, affectively positive scene to a bad, affectively negative scene in which good things turn into bad outcomes * redemption - moving from a bad, affectively negative scene to a subsequent good, affectively positive scene * positive resolution - ability to come to peace with, or let go of a challenging event
32
Themes of integrative meaning
* accomodative processing - degree to which protagonist has been forced to change their views of the self and world as a response to the environment * exploratory processing - degree to which active and engaged efforts to explore, reflect on or analyze a difficult experience with openness to learning from it and incorporating a sense of change into the life story * meaning-making - degree to which protagonist learns something or gleans a message from an event (vague meaning, no meaning, insights etc)
33
Structural elements of narratives (coding themes)
* coherence - degree to which narrator situates characters of life story in contexts, story follows temporal sequence of goal-oriented actions which are culturally recognized * complexity - degree of engagement in the narrative processing, as shown by depth of thought and nuance, such as seeing a variety of perspectives or emotions
34
research regarding these other themes
redemption & agency have a positive effect on short and long term wellbeing and psychoogical problems while contamination has a negative effect on long term wellbeing and psychological problems current well-being also predicts future well-being
35
in therapy settings, what has been observed by Adler
agency and coherence increased first, from which it followed that well-being increased as well reveals some kind of mechanism of change over therapy
36
qualitative analysis of narratives and other materials
- By just **coding schemes**, you tend to miss a lot of nuance and details or other themes **(top-down)** --> **qualitative analysis (bottom-up)** * Thematic analysis * Grounded theory * Case-wise narrative analysis * Phenomenological analysis Etc.
37
example of a bottom-up analysis: making meaning of trauma in psychosis
interviewed people with a lot of psychosis and trauma 4 story types identified 1. psychiatry as the wrong setting to find meaning 2. the ongoing struggle to get trauma-therapy 3. exposure to trauma as a threat to a stable life 4. disclosure as the key to resolving alienation, each story type compriss a different plot, meaning of trauma within the self-story, integration and barriers and facilitators in the meaning-making process.