Land Flashcards

(10 cards)

1
Q

What are Easements?

A

DADS
D - Dominant and Servient Tenement
A - Accommodates Land
D - Diversity of Occupation (owners/occupiers of D and S cannot be the same)
S - Subject Matter must be capable of being an easement (certain, not require expenditure by S, not extensive, usually cannot create new negative easements exception for light in certain circumstances)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How are Easements created?

A

Every Naughty Cat Wants Some Privacy
E - Express
N - Necessity (must be there is no other way for carrying out of right)
C - Common Intention (includes impliedly where land is known to be used for specific purpose, think of restaurant case (Wong))
W - Wheeldon v Burrows
S - Section 62 LPA
P - Prescription

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the rules of Wheeldon v Burrows?

A

Wheeldons CAN rule - on division of land where ‘quasi-easement’ already exists
C - Continuous
A - Apparent
N - Necessary for reasonable enjoyment (not the same as necessity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the rules of S62 LPA?

A

S62 makes rights NEW - rights that were enjoyed at time of legal conveyance are considered to be implied into the conveyance - must either be continuous and apparent OR diversity of occupation
N - Necessary for reasonable enjoyment
E - Enjoyed previously
W - Worded conveyance (Deed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When are easements considered legal versus equitable?

A
  • Created by Statute, deed or prescription and held on terms equivalent to freehold/leasehold, including implied
  • Unreg Land: run with the land and binding on all purchasers regardless of notice
  • Reg Land: date of first reg = ‘overriding interest’ but express grant following registration MUST be protected by notice on the S title
    *Equitable = formalities not followed; only protected if registered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can the burden of covenant run with land?

A

PINT of equity - remember must be RESTRICTIVE - Tulk v Moxhay
P - Proximity - D v S land but at time of creation, seller must retain D
I - Intention to pass to successors (can be implied via s79 LPA)
N - Notice (can’t bind S land if they didn’t know/agree)
T - Touch and Concern the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can a positive covenant be enforced against successors in title?

A

Indemnity Contract
Creation of lease instead of selling freehold
Halsall v Brizzell - mutual benefit and burden, if want the benefit, implied that you agree to the its burden (e.g. use of track but contribute to maintenance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can benefit of covenant pass at law?

A
  • Annexation: TILL; Touch and Concern land, Intention for it run (express or implied by s78 LPA), Legal estate in benefited land of covenantee, Legal title is passed to buyer
    *Assignment: expressly at time of transfer in writing with notice to burdened
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can benefit of covenant pass in equity?

A
  • Annexation: same as common law
    *Assignment
  • Building Schemes - estate divided with the same restrictions applied too all the different parts and when brought known that would be enforceable by each separate buyer; In essence, this relies on the “common intention” behind the building scheme to generate a shared set of rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly