Language and Gender Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

Sex

A

Biological difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

gender

A

socially expected characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Julia Stanley (1973) Male as the norm syndrome

A

man - from germanic ‘mann’ meaning humankind
woman- from old english ‘wifmon’ meaning man’s wife

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dale Spender (1960)

A

found most primary school teachers were female so were referred to as ‘she’ - which the male teachers didn’t like

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

wilson (1533)

A

ruled that the should precede the woman in pairs
E.G. son/daughter
-nobody disagreed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

poole (1646)

A

argued male should precede female as they were the worthier sex - nobody disagreed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

john kirby

A

ruled that the man gender was more comprehensive so the female gender would be included in it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1800s grammarians claimed that

A

‘they’ and ‘their’ couldn’t be used in sentences like: anyone could do it if they tried - anyone is singular

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

sex discrimination act (1975)

A

meant it was illegal to write a job advert in a way that implied only one sex could apply
- however some words like fireman and waitress are still used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

patronyms

A

names that refer to male lines of inheritance E.G. johnson or o’brian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

matronyms

A

(in iceland) mother’s firstname plus term for daughter or son

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

goddard (1983) terms of endearment

A

many women dislike men using terms of endearment as it suggests:
- it is his right as a man
-any right minded female will welcome it
CONTEXT IS IMPORTANT
-regionality affects the reaction
E.G. ‘love’ in manchester; ‘pet’ in newcastle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

hoey (2005)

A

uses the term ‘lexical priming’ to describe how words can develop an ‘‘undercoat layer’ built from habitual usage in the same contexts
E.G. strutting and bellows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Goldberg (1974) perception of gender

A

gave female students sets of booklets containing the same article, one by John T McKay, the other by Joan T McKay - they all find writing to be superior in all areas.
- this is because as children learn to speak, they absorb the values, assumptions and expectations of the adults who surround them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Julia Stanley (1973) language and controlling sexual behaviour

A

there are generally more words to describe men than women - most show them in a favourable light.
26 words describe men (in terms of sexual promiscuity) and many were complementary - there is no equal to ‘slut’.
220 words describe women - all are degrading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sue Lees in her book ‘Losing Out’

A

argue that men control female sexual behaviour by the use of derogatory terms.
‘slag’- used for girls who actively pursue boys and treat them how they treat girls
- male equivalent is ‘stud’, a very different meaning

17
Q

folk-linguistics

A

assumptions on linguistics not scientific facts E.G. women talk more than men, but modern research shows it is context dependent.

18
Q

Lakoff (1975) language and a woman’s place

A

women use language that makes them seem un-confident E.G. hesitation, hedging, approval seeking tag questions and euphemistic politeness terms. -To talk like a lady
-LINKS WITH GOLDBERG (1974)

19
Q

William O’Barr and Bowman Atkinson (1980)

A

did a study in courtroom over 30 months
-argued that the language that man women seem uncertain was based on power not sex
- COUNTERS LAKOFF (1975)

20
Q

Lakoff’s dominance theory (1975)

A

hedging
(super) polite forms
approval seeking tag questions
speak in italics
empty adjectives
direct quotations
have a special lexicon
question intonation in declarative statements
wh-imperatives
overusing qualifiers
apologise more
modal constructions
indirect commands or requests
more intensifiers
speak less frequently
avoid taboo or expletives
lack a sense of humour
- LAST THREE ARE TIME/CONTEXT RELEVANT

21
Q

Pamela Fishman (1983) - dominance theory

A

studied 52 hours of mixed gender interactions and found women do most of the ‘work’
women make an effort to create an inclusive conversation atmosphere - men become involved when the topic interests them, they then dominate the conversation.
- women limit themselves by being linguistically available to men, the ones that aren’t are ‘bitchy’ or ‘aggressive’

22
Q

Zimmerman and West (1975) dominance theory

A

found men are more likely to interrupt in mixed sex conversation
HOWEVER:
all P’s under 35, white and middleclass
-this conclusion came about because in 11 conversations, men interrupted 46 times whereas women only twice.

23
Q

Dale Spender (1980) Dominance Theory

A

suggests women are trapped in a world of language that is not of their making - men control language to the point that the most taboo word (cunt) is avoided by women, despite being part of their own body

24
Q

Deborah Tannen (1990) - difference theory

A

suggested there are male and female ‘cultures’ with their own rules, shared meanings and ways of doing things - in mixed sex groups there are miscommunications

25
Deborah Tannen (1990) - you just don't understand men and women in conversation (difference theory)
'would you like to go for a coffee?' (indirect command or request) 'no thanks' so they didn't stop. men and women interpret the same interactions differently - causing miscommunications men : monitor convos for signals of power and status women : monitor convos for signals alignment and solidarity
26
Tannen's work summarised: status vs support
men: believe convo is competitive and strive to ensure other's don't dominate them women: use it to gain support and confirmation
27
Tannen's work summarised: independence vs intimacy:
men: because they focus on status, they strive for independence women: seek closeness and support
28
Tannen's work summarised: advice vs understanding:
men: like to find solutions to problems women: seek sympathy and understanding
29
Tannen's work summarised: info vs feelings:
men: exchange information briefly E.G. phone call to arrange a meeting women: talk more about their feelings and emotions
30
Tannen's work summarised: orders vs proposals:
men: make orders using direct imperatives women: suggest things in more indirect ways
31
Tannen's work summarised: conflict vs compromise:
men: are more likely to voice their opposition women: are less likely to object and will complain later
32
Peter Trudgill ((1972) - difference theory
suggests these difference are down to social values rather than biology women use overt prestige whereas men use covert prestige
33
Maltz and Borker (1982) - difference theory
argue that men and women have different discourse norms given that they usually aquire communicative competence in single sex groups E.G. 'mhm' (back-channelling) for women means 'i hear you' but for men means 'i agree'
34
Maltz and Borker (1982) - difference theory (continued..)
when girls learn to do 3 things when in their formative years: maintain closeness and equality criticise others in acceptable ways to accurately interpret other girl's speech boys: assert a position of dominance attract and maintain an audience assert themselves when another speaker has the floor