Language and Thought Essentials Flashcards
What did Perfors (2004) study? What were his results?
Attractiveness of men and women with the same face was mediated by the name they were given
Certain sounds were more attractive for names for men or women
What did Loftus and Palmer (1974) find?
Using different verbs when describing a car crash affected the speed people estimated the car to be going (9mph difference) and whether they reported seeing broken glass
What are the limitations of the Loftus and Palmer (1974) study?
used uni students whose estimations of speed may not be that good, might be evidence of memory reconstruction as opposed to false perception
What did Fausey and Boroditsky (2011) investigate?
The use of the passive construction in accidental events in Spanish and English speakers
What did Fausey and Boroditsky (2011) find?
Passive used more in Spanish than in English for accidents (same amount for intentional events)
Spanish participants were less likely to remember
who was responsible
Is there evidence that using more agentive constructions leads to more harsh punishment?
Fausey and Boroditsky (2010)
found that English participants were more likely to blame people and gave harsher punishments (53% more fines) when agentive phrases were used rather than passive ones
What do we know about English and Hebrew writing patterns?
They affect thought
Hebrew speakers order events RTL while English speakers order then LTR
What patterns can be found in how Chinese speakers order things?
de Sousa, 2012
they show ordering patterns that are consistent with changes in writing
writing used to be vertical but due to Westernisation, is sometimes horizontal now
What did Levinson and Majid (2013) find about writing systems?
Yeli Dnye speakers who have mainly not been schooled were asked to order events
there was a strong relationship between linear order and literacy
linguistic convention influences ordering of time
BUT evidence from chickens that there is a slight predisposition for LTR order
What did Bidelman et al. (2013) find?
Cantonese speakers have better pitch discrimination and melody perception than English speakers (comparable to English musicians) because they speak a tonal language
How can Bidelman et al.’s (2013) findings be developed?
Test them in other tonal languages and see if the findings can be replicated
Find ways to do tests within languages/cultures as culture is a confound
What did Berlin and Kay (1969) do?
studied basic colour terms in 20 languages (variety)
also devised a way of defining basic colour terms
theorised an implicational hierarchy for basic colour terms
What were the cons of Berlin and Kay’s (1969) research?
not the most representative sample, many speakers were bilingual from the US and from similar BGs, tested few people per language, used speakers and dictionaries
What were the pros of Berlin and Kay (1969)’s research?
groundbreaking method and standardisation of colours using the grid, and moving away from the notion that all languages view colours the same
How was Regier, Kay and Kheterpal’s (2011) experiment an improvement of Berlin and Kay’s (1969) work?
studied 110 non-literate languages
found similar results to B&K
What did Regier, Kay and Cook (2005) find?
That the best examples of colours cluster around the same ones as in English and closer together across languages than the centroids of each colour
What did Davidoff et al. (1999) do?
Compared Berinmo (grue language) to English
found that they were able to remember colour matches more accurately when they were across boundaries then when they were within the same boundary
What did Roberson and Davidoff (2000) do?
used verbal and visual interference to investigate whether language was used online in colour memory tasks in English speakers
What did Roberson and Davidoff (2000) find?
when language was useful (across colour terms) verbal interference had a negative effect on identification, but when it wasn’t useful (within colour terms) there was no negative effect of language
What did Thierry et al. (2009) do?
Studied preattentive change detection in Greek (2 blue terms, 1 green) and English (1 blue, 1 green)
What was Thierry et al. (2009) examining?
vMMN (visual mismatch negativity) elicited by deviant visual stimuli (odd-ones-out) regardless of focus
What did Thierry (2009) find?
significantly greater deviant score for blue than green in Greek participants, no significant difference in English ones
Difference in P1 latency based on colour and luminance for Greek ps, only luminance for English ps
What did Winawer (2007) study and find?
Russian speakers (blue/dark blue) and English speakers’ colour discrimination
had to match target blue to 2 options (within or accross boundary)
Russian speakers were quicker across than within but verbal interference (not spatial) removed this effect
no difference in english speakers and no effect of interference
What are the pros of Winawer (2007)?
Studied reaction time which is more subtle and resistant to intentional manipulation
Didn’t look at memory which is reconstructive not perceptual