Language development Flashcards

1
Q

Hocket & Charles (1960)

A

differences that make our language special:

arbitrariness - no connection between sound and message

displacement - talking about things not present

productivity - create new utterances

duality of patterning - meaningless phonic segments combined to make something meaningful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

forms

A

phonology and syntax/morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

function

A

semantics and pragmatics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

phones

A

differences in sounds we use and how we use them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

phonemes

A

if a phone changed the meaning of a word

  • infants born able to hear all phonemes - becomes specific to their own language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

phonological development

A

7 months - canonical babbling (reduplicated sounds)
10 months - babbling reflects sounds of the environment
1 year - variegated babbling (sounds like words)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

gaze following

A

18 months

checking where people are looking when they are speaking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

joint attention

A

9 months

2 or more people attend to something and are mutually aware of it
- predicts age of language production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

pointing

A

9-14 months

imperative - tell someone to do something
declarative - inform someone about something

index finger - predicts vocabulary development
open handed pointing - delay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

words

A

10-15 months - begin to produce words

slow until 50-100 words in lexicon
6 years - 10-14’000 words in lexicon
8-10 years - 12 new words per day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

errors in speech

A

spoonerisms - changes letters of two words

malapropisms - word replaces similar sounding word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

semantics

A

meaning of a word and how to use it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

errors of scope

A

semantic issues

underextentions (too little detail) or overextensions (too much detail - over applying)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how children learn semantics/meaning of words

A

learn to make assumptions - more likely to mean the whole rather than a part of an object

associative learning - word used when the same object is present

social cues - if you have been looking for something, find it and someone says the word

linguistic cues - other words give clues about reference

mutual exclusivity - knowing what other words mean = vital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

McArthur-Bates communicative development inventory (CDI)

A

parental reports of language development

show vast individual differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SES and learning

A

large role in explaining differences in language development

less contingent talk

17
Q

Contingent talk

A

child directed speech that focus’ infants attention semantically (what infant is attending to) and temporally (in response to infants vocalisation)

18
Q

grammar

A

allows combination of words to convey different meanings

19
Q

syntax

A

organisation into larger structures (sentences)

who did what to whom
novel (made up words) can be used to test, adding into a sentence to see if they respond as if it were a word

20
Q

morphemes

A

forms of words

21
Q

inflectional morphemes (morphology)

A
marks:
tense
person
numer
possession

Berko (1958) - WUG test

22
Q

inflectional morpheme developmental trajectory

A

discover an inflection - errors of omission (wug not wugs)

over imply the inflection (he blewed up)

balance applying the inflections and remember exceptions

23
Q

Chomsky - Universal Grammar (UG)

A

nativist approach - can’t learn grammar by copying what they hear around them because:

poverty of stimulus problem
no negative evidence problem

24
Q

poverty of stimulus problem

A

can produce complex utterances without every hearing them before

25
no negative evidence problem
don't have direct feedback on their wrong grammar
26
universal grammar (UG)
grammatical categories and principles (rules) used to generate grammatical sentences suggested to be an innate system
27
issues with UG
what innate knowledge makes up this system?
28
constructivist approach to grammar
grammar is learnable: imitation analogies generalisation
29
pragmatics
ability to adapt our language to the context we are in ``` turn taking understanding implicatures (some compared to all) talking in different registers narrative skills (things that aren't there) ```
30
Development of pragmatics
early inclination to engage in turn taking (helps develop their lexicon)
31
referential choice
struggle with how and when to use a word so refer to things in ambiguous ways (he/she)
32
feedback
respond well to request for classification - helping provide detail repairing utterances - add detail a child needs to get their point across
33
scaffolding
child directed speech - motherease following in - commenting on an object that has a child's attention adjust language for child expansion - say it the correct way for them clarification request - when they don't understand they ask questions
34
atypical development
delays in language effects other things could come from: hearing loss (need for cochlear implant) cleft pallet - can't produce sounds learning difficulties
35
Developmental language Disorder (DSD)
can't be explained by any hearing loss of other developmental disorder 2/30 children affected struggle to comprehend and produce speech