Language, thought and communication Flashcards
(83 cards)
Piaget’s theory: language and thought
We learn through developing schemas (mental structures)
Schemas definition
a schema describes a pattern of behaviour or thought that organizes categories of information and the relationships among them.
Language depends on thought - Piaget’s theory
Thought and understanding first. Language develops after.
Young children - Piaget’s theory
Can have language without understanding but will not be able to use it effectively.
The development of language stages/ages
Sensorimotor stage (0-2 years) - children start to speak, Pre-operational stage (2-7 years) - Talk about things not present.
Logical thinking stage/age
Concrete operational stage (7-11 years) - Children develop own ideas.
Challenging Piaget’s theory of language and thought evaluation
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis challenges Piaget’s theory suggesting that sometimes language comes first.
Schemas weakness
They can’t be scientifically measured.
Piaget’s theory supporting evidence
The order of children’s two-word phrases shows understanding.
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
Not possible to think about something that you have no words for.
Thinking depends on language
Language comes first, thought afterwards.
Strong version: language determines thought
if there are no words for an object or idea then you can’t think about it.
weak version: language influences thinking
words help to “mould” the world. You can still imagine things with no words for them.
The Sapir -Whorf hypothesis evaluation - differences are exaggerated
Inuit culture may only have two words for snow, now twenty seven, while the english has four (Pellum)
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis evaluation - thoughts come before language
If there is lots of snow then this changes how we perceive the environment.
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis evaluation - restricted and elaborated code.
Working-class children use restricted language which affects their ability to think, explaining lower intelligence (Bernstein).
variation of recall of events - Native Americans: The Hopi
Hopi don’t distinguish the past, present or future from one another. The affects the way they think about time.
Variation of recall of events - Language effects the recall of events
Memory effected by the labels given (Carmichael et al.)
Variation of recall of events evaluation - limited sample
Only one individual studied from the hopi
Variation of recall of events evaluation - Ambiguous materials
Carmichael’s study not reflective on everyday life because of less ambiguity.
Variation in recognition of colours - Native Americans: The Zuni
Zuni people only have one world for shades of orange and yellow, and in a research study had difficulty distinguishing them (Brown and Lenneberg)
Variation in recognition of colours - language affects recall of colour
Berinmo people had difficulty recalling colours as they only have five words for colour.
Variation in recognition of colours evaluation - difficulties with cross-cultural understanding
Participants from other cultures may misunderstand the task or fail to communicate their answers correctly.
Variation in recognition of colours evaluation - opposite results
Dani people had no problem matching colour despite only having two words for colour (Rosch and Oliver)