law and justice Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q

law definition

A

Sir John Salmond ‘body of principles and applied by the state in the administration of justice’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

justice definiton

A

just behavior and treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

miscarriage of justice definition

A

failure of court or judicial system to come to a just conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

plato definition of justice

A

Harmony between the different sectors or classes in society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

lord lloyd definition of justice

A

‘the means of a man in order to attain a good life’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Chain Perelman definition of justice

A

Justice cannot be studied logically – it is based on a persons subjective values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 6 key ways he defines justice

A

(to each according to his…)

needs

works

merits

rank

legal entitlement

equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the problems in defining justice (4)

A

Perelman argues that defining justice is impossible because it is subjective. This idea is reflected in Lord Wright’s view that justice is whatever appears just to a just person, similar to how reasonableness is judged by a reasonable person.

Some see justice as equality, but it often focuses more on equity—ensuring fairness by balancing the scales. For example, in tort law, compensation aims to restore the claimant to their original position before harm occurred.
E.g. tort law remedies – compensation aims to put the claimant back in the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

whats a counterpoint

A

Seen in Lord Wright’s definition of justice

“…the guiding principle of a judge in deciding cases is to do justice…What is just in a particular case is what appears to be just to the just man, in the same way as what is reasonable appears to be reasonable to the reasonable man”

The law needs to maintain a balanced, middle-of-the-road view to attempt to achieve justice for all

This can be seen through the use of jury trials (12 people deciding gives an average)

Also sentencing guidelines for judges which try to ensure consistency in sentencing practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the 4 types of justice

A

Formal
Substantive
Distributive
Corrective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

formal

A

justice is achieved when correct procedure is followed in making and upholding the law justice is ac

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

substantive

A

justice is achieved through the substance and content of the law ensuring legal rules are just and fair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

distributive

A

achieved by ensuring the distribution of resources in society is done fairly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

corrective

A

justice is achieved by punishing thosw who have done wromg in order to rebalance the scales

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

FORMAL/PROCEDURAL JUSTICE examples (6)

A

police
courts/ judiciary
roles of juries
appeals
legal aid
the rules of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

police explanation/ example

A

PACE procedures ensure there is due process in the law and that suspects are given rights such as access to a solicitor which helps to ensure they are treated justly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

courts/ judiciary

A

Courts/ judiciary foollow set procedusres and are governed by the rules in article 6 which protect the right to defend yourself in court including factors such as discolure of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

roles of juries

A

Ensures there is a ‘trail by your peers’ which supports just decision being made – including jury equity (e.g colson statute case)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

appeals

A

Allowed which ensure any issue in the administration of justice are addressed- such as PACE processes not ebing followed or defences not being raised which should habe been (alhuwalia and diminshed resp- killed husband abusive first murder then manslaughter on appeal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

legal aid

A

Provided to achieve access to justice and help those on low income oay for a solicitor/ barrister to help them defend themsleves which increases the chance of getting justice. Former hustice secretary ken clarke ‘ I genuinly believe access to justce is the hallmark of a civilised society’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

the rule of law

A

Followed meaning no one is above the law and no one is below the law- e.g in a and others the discriminatory laws doe terror suspects were declared incompatible due to treating suspects as if they were below the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is substantive justice

A

whether the substance of legal rules deliver justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

why does this exist (4)

A

AR must be voluntary

MR must be present- and a defence will take away this making the law fair

Howeverm defences such as intoxication and insanity may make the law unfair

Different level of mens rea for more serious defences (e.g gbh s20 v s.18)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what can we talk about from tort law in this (2 cases)

A

Negligence requires a duty of care which is only imposed if its ‘fair, just and reasonable’ (Hill) and uses objective test for breach (standard of reasonable man- Blyth)

Occupiers liability imposes a duty to protect forseeable injuries to tresspassers (herrington v brb)

Strict Liability rules for Rylands v Fletcher and vicarious liability allow a remedy for claimants suffering injury

25
what are the 3 issues with this
Majewski rules on intoxication Strict liability in criminal law Strict liability in tort law (e.g. vicarious liability)
26
Majewski rules on intoxication explanation
Recklessness of getting drunk satisfies mens rea
27
Majewski rules on intoxication- how would this lead to a lack of justice
This is not just because the mens rea requires recklessness towards the crime (e.g recklessness to apply to unlawful force for battery)- therefore reckless behaviour towards drinking/ taking drugs doesn’t properly satisfy the mens rea)
28
Strict liability in criminal law explanation
OFFENCES CAN BE COMMITTED WITH ONLY THE ACTUS REUS BEING PRESENT. THE DEFENDANT’S STATE OF MIND IS IRRELEVANT.
29
Strict liability in criminal law - how would this lead to a lack of justice
However, these can be very harsh on defendants- e.g in Storkwain, the pharmacists were unaware the prescritions were forgeries, so the D treated unjustly in being dound guilty)
30
Strict liability in tort law (e.g. vicarious liability) explanation
Vicarious liability makes defendant employers respondisbpe for the tortious actions of their employees
31
Strict liability in tort law (e.g. vicarious liability) - how would this lead to a lack of justice
However, this is unjust and unfair as the employers werenr the ones who committed the tort- and the fsct this can also include criminal behaviour (e.g lister v hesley hall) leads to injustice for employers
32
what is distributive justice reflected in
Anti discrimination laws (equality act 2010) Minimum wage Tax and welfare system
33
what are the 2 issues within distrubtive justice
Class / Wealth Gender / Race / Disability
34
Class / Wealth explanation
Often those with wealth and status avoid facing justice for their crimes Large corporations and rich individuals often go unpunished for tax evasion offences as these are investigated sparsely by police who focus on blue collar crime (e.g. committed by the working class) In addition those with wealth can often pay for better legal representation to avoid punishment those not as wealthy may have to turn to crime
35
Gender / Race / Disability explanation
Women are disproportionately victims of crime with low conviction rates – e.g. domestic violence and rape MacPherson report and incidents leading to BLM movement show institutional racism of the police Baroness Casey Report (2023) found Met Police to be “institutionally racist, sexist and homophobic” Anti-discrimination laws for workers are criticized for being too weak at preventing incidents – being more reactive than proactive
36
what two things is corrective justice seen in
Sentencing offenders in criminal law Providing remedies to claimants in tort law
37
Sentencing offenders in criminal law explanation
Juwtice is delivered through the ladder principle of sentences increasing as seriousness of crime increases Justice delivered for defendants too as aggravating and migitating factors taken into account Various aims of punishment through community sentences
38
Providing remedies to claimants in tort law explanation
Theb aim of tort laws remedies is to put the claimant back into the position they would have been if the tort hadnt occurred However, the defence of contributpry negligence helps to provide justice to defendants too where compensation is reduced if the c is partly responsble for the injuries (sayers v harlow)
39
what are the 2 issues with this
High reoffending rates show sentencing does not always "correct" an offender inequality of bargaining power can lead to injustice for the weaker party - especially if a settlement is negotiated
40
High reoffending rates show sentencing does not always "correct" an offender statistics
Reoffending rates- 25-30% For adults released from prison for sentences under 12 months, the reoffending rate is 54%
41
inequality of bargaining power can lead to injustice for the weaker party - especially if a settlement is negotiated- use example from human rights
e.g a claimant may not be able to get all they deserve if their lawyer is not as forceful as the defendants lawyer Steel and Morris: ECtHR decided there was a breach of article 6 fair trail where mcdonalds had access to more resources to pay for legal representation- meaning there was no equality of arms
42
what does natural justice and rule of law state
"All equal before the law and in order to achieve justice we must all have equal access to the courts.“ Nobody is above the law or below the law Above the law - monarchs, politicians, celebrities can still be punished Below the law - everybody has access to justice through the courts and protection through human rights 
43
who do you need to name drop here
Aquinas (God) / Aristotle (Nature) Any law which does not derive from God/nature is illegitimate and does not need to be followed So immoral or unjust laws could just be broken 
44
who are the people for distributive justice
aristotle karl marx
45
what does aristotle say
justice is proportionality
46
whats an example of this
A sentence is proportional to the crime GBH s.20 = 5 years, s.18 = Life because it involves specific intent
47
what does karl marx say
distributed according to need “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” state is ruled by a dominant (capitalist) class who exploit the workforce (proletariat) and is therefore inherently unjust
48
where can we see this
Can be seen in NHS / welfare payments Also said crimes of the wealthy/ruling classes are ignored as police/courts focus on investigating and punishing crimes committed by the lower classes (e.g. violence/theft)
49
whats an example of natural justice and being treated below the law
A and Others- being held indefinitely without trail is against the rule of law as the defendants are being denied rights so treated as if theyre below the law
50
whats an example of natural justice and being treated above the law
Partygate and boris- those in power may be treated as if theyre above the law
51
whats a case example in distributive justice (think negligence)
Sayers v Harlow- supports justice through distribution according to contribution in cont negligence
52
what is Utilitarianism
Maximise human happiness – greatest good for the greatest number of people Diminishing pain and increasing pleasure for the majority of people Believed in minimal legal intervention of the state – unless harm is caused to another
53
who did he disagree with
Disagreed by Kant who states that if an act is wrong it is wrong regardless of the benefit/happiness of others (e.g. torture) It is not right to disregard the interests of an individual for the benefit of the majority
54
who are the two theorists for social justice
John Rawls Robert Nozick
55
what does John Rawls state
Justice is objective fairness (judged from the Point of View of someone with no interest in the outcome) We need to create an ‘original position’ in society where there is a ‘veil of ignorance’ in regards to people's views about their place in society (class, background, abilities) If this was in place, everybody would demand universal freedoms and rights for everybody and equal opportunities
56
what does Robert Nozick state
State should not interfere to redistribute wealth acquired through legitimate means Minimal state & no interference in private lives unless wrong is done to others
57
whats a case backing utilitarianism
R v alhuwania- killed her husband due to domestic violence- seen as justifiable based on making society safer and happiness of others
58
whats an act backing social justice
Equality act- anti discrimination so everyone is treated equally (rawls)
59
whats a case backing this
R v martin- household owners have more protection over their property