Law Cases VL

Question 1

VL Frolic?

Answer 1

Twine v beans express: Employers were not VL as the driver was doing an unauthorised act and employers gained no benefit from it.

Question 2

Control Test VL

Answer 2

Hawley V Luminar Leisure: As the club exercised so much control in how the bouncer should act it employed him and he was liable.

Question 3

Economic Reality test

Answer 3

Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of pensions
1 Employee works for wage
2 employee expressly accepts work is subject to employer
3 All considerations in contract are consistent with there being an employment contract

Question 4

Acting Against orders

Answer 4

Rose V Plenty
Work done by the milkman boy benefitted the dairy so they were VL

Question 5

Frolic

Answer 5

Twine V Beans express
Employers Not VL as driver was doing an unauthorised act which employers gained no benefit from