LEC.114 Social geography Flashcards
(41 cards)
Essentialist approach to identity?
- We each inhabit a particular, fixed identity which can be defined and known
- Identities can be made up of multiple strands e.g., ‘disabled man’ but an individuals identity is assumed to remain relatively fixed over time
Gender essentialism?
- Gender bianry of two genders - man and woman
- Particularly divisive in sports
Example of gender essentialism (+racism)?
Female athletes of colour who beat white female athletes are more likely to be accused of transgenderism
What does an essentialist approach to identity assume?
Presumes that groups of people sharing the same identity will also share characteristics - eugenics, stereotyping, white supremacy, scientific racism
What does an essentialist approach to identity lead to?
Presumes that groups of people sharing the same identity will also share characteristics - eugenics, stereotyping, white supremacy, scientific racism
Relational/multi-faceted approaches to identity?
Identity is not fixed, can change over time and in different contexts. Political, personal, emotional. Variety of scales. Identity is a product of our intersections with other people/things, but it is also something we pro-actively ‘do’.
How can identity be dangerous when its defined and bound?
Can be controlled or limited by others perceptions of our wants, needs, competencies etc. based on imposed identities
How can identity categorisation be used by those in power?
Retain power over those who are different
How can identity be empowering?
By celebrating and nurturing identities, when organised by those within the identity group
Identity and intersectionality?
The way our identities intersect is important for example multiple privileges may make us particularly privileges, whilst multiple marginalised identities may increase our experience of marginalisation.
Identity as a performance?
Crafting an identity for a real or imagined audience.
- choosing to ‘fit in’ or ‘stand out’
- could even be fitting in by standing out - social media loves different when done in boundaries of perceived normal or okay
- identity is both expressed and reinforced materially
Pre-industrial concepts of identity?
- not an at individual level
- small communities
- work based identity
Industrialisation’s impact on identity?
- movement of people
- new people
- mixing of culture
- disability becomes an identity
- age seen in a new way
Social constructionism of identity?
- identity is relational, a product of societal norms
- ideas about identity change spatially and temporally
Psycho-analytical approach to identity?
- identity reflects a human need to bound things and in doing so create ‘other’
- if we see ourselves as individuals we have a way of conceptualising who we are
- can go hand in hand with social constructionism
Neoliberalism and identity?
Lends itself to the idea of the project of self - the increasing of individualisation. Increased idea that we are all individuals and the project of our identity is our own project, leads to increased perception of personal risk and uncertainty.
Cultural capital?
- identity curated through individual choice
- identity can be cultivated, purchased, consumed through access to cultural pursuits that carry kudos
- is high social status universally attainable thanks to the proliferation of free sources of cultural credit??
Cultural capital vs economic capital
Whilst access to things are now free, cultural capital can be seen as a form of elitism that perpetuates social exclusion of those in poverty. Free does not equal universally accessible
Urban space and multiculturalism?
Allows us toe encounter difference. Which leads to understanding and familiarisation. But familiarisation can also breed contempt - the rural/urban dichotomy
Is exclusion social or spatial?
Both, simultaneously
How did Philo (2000) describe exclusion?
“a situation in which certain sections of society are, or become, separated from much that comprises the normal ‘round’ of living, and working within that society”
Why does marginalisation happen?
Because some identities are stigmatised. The ‘less than’ identities are marginalised as they are different to the ‘norma;’ and ‘desired’ identity.
Goffman and stigmatisation? (1963)
defined stigma as an “attribute that is deeply discrediting” referring to ‘abnormalities’ such as “tribal stigmas”, “physical deformities”, and “blemishes of character”. Goffman discussed that stigma acts as a marker which can lead society to change their view on an individual “from a whole and usual person to a tainted, discounted one”.
Stigmatisation is a way to protect who/what and how?
Protect the interests of the powerful social group by devaluing and ‘othering’ those who are different.