Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PY2TA > lecture 1 perceptual development > Flashcards

lecture 1 perceptual development Flashcards

1
Q

define infancy

A

a period of rapid development - without speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define 1 month

A

cant support own head
helpless - attentive to people and world around
mainly motor development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define 4 month

A

ability to manipulate objects, hold self up and more mobile

improved sensory abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define 6 month

A

more goal directed behaviours
more mobile - roll over etc
ability to explore is improved - become more active and independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define 9 month

A

behaviour is more intentional - chose what to explore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define 24 month

A

speech and language begins to develop

have a mental representational process - greater comprehension of abstract and things that arent present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is newborn sight like in early age (up to 2 months)?

A

poorly developed - see objects 30cm away clearly and far sighted - any further and things are blurred
must purposefully adust vision to see into the distance- rapid improvement 4
eye muscles for focusing are weak and retinal membrane for capturing light is not fully matured
limited visual acuity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does improvements in vision following 2 months help the infant

A

look at objects from different distances
colour discrimination rapidly becomes adult like
can actively explore the environment
greater at scanning the perceptual environment, navigating, manipulating objects and anticipating future events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe san and streri 2007

A

habituate newborn infants to shape or texture

then ask to touch object (and vise versa) without seeing them until habituated to then show similar/different/same object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were san and streri looking to find

A

to see if the previous exposure leads to dishabituation in a different domain ie attend to same texture object with different shape for longer and therefore recognise it is different
see if infants can integrate the information received between sensory modalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

san and steri results

A

VT: dishabituation when see object then touch second different object (better at recog diff textures when see then touch)
TV: dishabituate more when touch shape then exposed to new (reognise diff in shape)

in all cases spend longer with novel than familiar obect suggesting can discriminate accross domains
shape discrimination not bidirectional - transfer TV but not VT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the different tastes

A 
bitter
sweet 
sour
umami
salty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what tastes can infants detect from birth

A

bitter sweet sour and umami

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why is it hypothesised that children cant taste salty flavours from birth

A

salty taste not developed but becomes present by end of 3-4 months
thought to be due tot he development of salt receptors
- suprising as simple - require na+ VG channels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how can you determine infant taste

A

facial expressions differ when taste showing they can discriminate between the tastes
ie purse lips to sour, relax to sweet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe mannella, jagnow and beauchamp group CW

A

breastfeeding mothers into 3 groups:

1. CW - drink carrot juice 4 days a week for 3 weeks in last trimester and water at breastfeeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

describe mannella, jagnow and beauchamp group WC

A
  1. WC - water for last trimester, carrot juice 4 days for 3 weeks during breastfeeding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

describe mannella, jagnow and beauchamp group WW

A

water for last trimester and breastfeeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what did mannella, jagnow and beauchamp want to investigate

A

if infants can taste pre birth via amniotic fluid and therefore are influenced by taste preferences pre birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

how did mannella, jagnow and beauchamp test taste preference

A

test during weaning for preference in carrot based cereal

coded for negative facial expressions and taste preference (mother report) when eating plain or carrot cereal

21
Q

what did mannella, jagnow and beauchamp find

A

carrot juice in preg = sig fewer neg facial expressions while eating carrot cereal and significantly greater liking

22
Q

benefits of smell in infancy

A

activates strong memories - anchor

23
Q

describe coffield, mayhew, haviland jones and walker andrews smell

A

test 36 6-7moth infants distress and artention watching video of womaan expressing happiness or sadness
no odour or odour (baby talc or pie) coniditons

24
Q

findings of coffield mayhew havildand jones and walker andrews

A

odour infants spend sig longer looking at video than control in either happy or sad condition - odour gives infant security

25
Q

describe joran and brannon 2006 vision and hearing

A

asked if infants able to match sound of number of people speaking to visual cue of diff no of people
ie 2 people say look synchroniously but video of two and video of three people on screen - see if match sund with visual amount
measure infant looking time to videos

26
Q

results of jordan and brannon vision and hearing

A

infant spend sig longer at stimuli with matching no of people
infants can analyse speech to determine no of people talking

27
Q

when does vision become fully developed

A

20/80 by 6 months

80/90 by 4 years

28
Q

why might shape discrimination not be bidirectional (san and steri)

A

sensitivity to touch well developed at birth
ie ingenction leads to increased activity in sensorymotor cortex in infants, and greater for those born earlier
CNS more immature so more responsive/sensitive
therefore may get more info from touch than vision which is poor

29
Q

why is sweet taste detection important in infancy

A

allows the detection of breast milk in early development
but as salt receptors develop (around 4m infants have preference to salty/norm water) then may be preparing infants for solid food

30
Q

cooke and feilds early taste development and preference

A

early flavour exposire thought to improve dietary outcomes

31
Q

what does manella and beauchamp study suggest

A

the amniotic fluid and breast milk contains flavours that the infant can recognise and links to mother
influence dietary preferences

32
Q

schaal merlier and sausignan 2000 taste development preferences

A

mothers in france flavour foods with anise in prev 2 weeks of preg or not
babies more response towards taste and smell of anise whilst non anise babies more averse

33
Q

birch and fisher 1998 taste preferences and dietary outcomes

A

infants have tendency to be neophobic to new foods
only eat sweet/salty foods that reflect flavours already exposed to
liking/preference only increases witth experience so important to build preference and exposure

34
Q

sullivan and birch 1994 taste preferences and dietary outcomes

A

varied flavour experience in breast milk thought to facilitate greater acceptance of newer flavours in solid foods during weaning than formula

35
Q

the development of smell

A

sense of smell thought to develop from very yong age
infants highly responsive to maternal scents in first few hours of life
give particular attention to odours relating to breast milk and sebum

36
Q

marlier and schakil 2005 breast odour vs formula in infancy

A

more attentive to unfamiliar breast scents than formula, even when formula fed from birth

37
Q

delaunay-elallam, marlier and schaak 2006 odour exposure

A

exposed infants to odreants perviously exposed to or not (camomile - ca) - may or may not have developed a preference
are those exposed more positive towards the odour than those naive
- found more attracive but could not differentiate ca with a scented control ie vanilla
naive prefer milk to ca but ca exposure show equal preference for both
exposure increase preference

38
Q

oiko and turkewitz 2001 odour differentiation

A

newborns can discriminate odours from non odours
dig more head turning/preference to vanilla when in left >right nostril (left hemisphere activation)
- partial support for valence hypothesis that left hemisphere represents pos emotion and right rep pos and neg (BUT NEG ODOUR NOT SIG IN RIGHT)
- approach behaviours develop earlier than avoidance?

39
Q

vision and hearing in infancy

A

hearing not fully developed from bith and develops over first 3-4 months BUT sensitiv to general sounds from 3 days

40
Q

vouloumonos and werker 2004 hearing and speech

A

infants prefer complex>simple tones in infancy
more so for human speech sounds than structurally non similar speech
could be due to experience of human speech from and before birth or an innate mechanism that leads to preference

41
Q

the neonatal synaesthesia hypothesis

A

sharing of information across modalities in infancy may infer a universal synaesthetic experience in young infants as a result of un-pruned neural sensory pathways that are yet to develop fully

42
Q

define synaesthesia

A

stimulation of one sensory pathway triggers the stimulation of a second sensory pathway

43
Q

why might neonatal synaesthesia be useful in infancy

A

infants must rely on a mix of sensory information as they lack experience and not all modalities are sufficiently developed
allows to gain a better understanding of the world aorund them where the quality of the information they gain may be limited

44
Q

cross modal transfer and synaesthesia

A

exposure to regular pairings between sensations may lead to associations
ie shapes with sounds
help to predict attributes of multisensory entities and perceptually detect when all together
assoc info in one sense logically with that obtained in the other and create a pairing

45
Q

what does infant synaesthesia suggest about synaesthesia in adulthood

A

infant synaethesia thought to decrease over time through pruning of neural pathways and greater specialisation of sensory modalities
adult synaesthesia thought to be caused by inefficient pruning of synaptic sensory connection sin infancy causing hyperconnectivity into adulthood

46
Q

vision and scale

A

over first 3 years infants develop the ability to determine the scale of the objects around them
18-30m/o make scale errors

47
Q

what are scale errors

A

attempt by infants to make use of an object/perform a task even though it is impossible in relation to its actual size

48
Q

deleache, uttal, rosengren 2013 scale errors

A

when presented with miniature versions of the toys played with previously, infants still try to use in the same way as would when normal size
ie trying to drive toy car

49
Q

glover 2004 scale errors

A

infants havea dissociation between visual info of object recognition and action planning
they lack the inhibitory control and integration between perception and action
overwhelmingly want to play that infants temporarily fail to recognise size difference
object activates representation of larger version of object and action plan but fail to inhibit the inappropriate action

PY2TA (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions