Lecture 10 Flashcards

1
Q

Meiosis stages

A
  1. Chromosomes become shorter and thicker; chiasmata are prominent
  2. Homologous chromosomes repel; they are held together by chiasmata
  3. Bivalents align on the metaphase plate
  4. Homologous chromosomes separate
  5. Chromosomes align on the metaphase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What happens when bivalents lack the chiasmata

A

They are prone to nondysjunction where you don’t get proper segregation of the chromosomes into the gametes at the end, you don’t get recombination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is meitotic recombination of fundamemental importance

A
  • It generates new combinations of genotypes which is essential for adaptation/ natural selection
  • Determines to what extent loci residing in different genomic locations are associated with one another (linkage)
  • Crossover is critical for correct segregation of chromosomes during meiosis but its also really important for mixing genetic material between the maternal and the paternal genomes so the gametes aren’t identical to the parental genome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is linkage disequilibrium

A

The extent to which the allele frequencies at two loci are correlated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does recombination do to LD

A

It breaks down LD which makes selection more efficient because it allows new and more favourable mutations to be more integrated into the population together and it allows selection to eliminate deleterious combinations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is background selection

A

Selection is going to act to purge those from the population. All the black lines (chromosomes are going to be lost from the population because they have a lower fitness leaving behind deleterious mutations.

Therefore in the next generation, this means that mutations can occur and become weakly linked with the deleterious mutation.

So therefore we get fixation of this bad mutation because you can’t have recombination to shuffle the mutations between the different chromosomes in order to create a mutation free chromosome .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mullers Rachets

A

there’s no recombination so there’s no shuffling of mutations between different chromosomes - what happens is there’s this stochastic loss of mutation free chromosome (purely by chance) - your population then starts to accumulate these deleterious mutations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Genetic hitchhiking

A

deleterious mutations along with a beneficial mutation, there’s selection for the strongly beneficial mutation (positive fitness effect) however, its in LD with a deleterious mutation so as well as the beneficial mutation getting fixed, the deleterious one also does as well - can separate that linkage between the beneficial and the deleterious mutation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ruby in the Rubbish

A

Opposite of the last where you get beneficial mutations that have been lost from the population simply because they’re linked with a really deleterious mutation that’s going to be eliminated from the population (lose those deleterious mutations)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What’s the variation of recombination rates like across species

A

There’s huge recombination rate variations

This is strange because recombination is fundamental so why are some species doing it more and some doing it less? This may have implications for how efficient selection

Its important that we start to measure the intensity of recombination and its evolutionary significance due to the variation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where are the variations in recombination

A

Across a species

Across males and females of a species (between individuals

Across the genome

Across the chromosomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the genetic distance and how is it measured

A

The degree of genetic linkage between two loci is measured by the frequency of recombination between two loci

  • c ranges between 0
    (complete linkage) to 0.5 (independent
    assortment or unlinked)
    – The standard unit is cM (centi-Morgan)
    – 1 cM = 1% probablilty of producing a recombinant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What do we need to consider

A
  • The genetic distance between locus A and locus B is 17cM, and so is that between locus C and locus D. (you can work out genetic distance by dividing the genetic distance by the physical distance- related but there’s no direct correlation between the two )
  • But the physical distance between the the first pair of loci is 10 Mb, and that between the second pair is 50 Mb
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the recombination rate

A
  • Standard unit: cM/Mb (or cM Mb-1)
  • A measure of recombination
    propensity per genomic length unit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Example calculation for genetic distance

A
  • Between A and B: 17cM/10Mb = 1.7cM/Mb- recombination rate is higher which makes sense because they’re closer together (not a linear correlation)
  • Between C and D: 17cM/50Mb =
    0.34cM/Mb
  • The average rate is higher between A and B
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Iceland case study

A
  • 5,136 microsatellite markers (as genetic markers)
    – 869 individuals in 146 Icelandic families (pedigree-based)
  • Were able to measure 1,257 meioses
  • Obtained recombination rates by mapping the markers to the genome
    sequence (there are 3billion base pairs in the human genome, calculated the recombination rate- divided genetic distance by the physical distance)
  • The total length of the sex-averaged genetic map: 3,615 cM (22
    autosomes and the X)
  • Genome size ≈ 3×109 = 3,000 Mb
  • Mean sex-averaged rate ≈ 1.205 cM/Mb
17
Q

Variation in recombination rate between chromosomes

A

-Shorter chromosomes tend to have high recombination rates
– E.g., the average rates of chr 21 and 22 are twice as high as those of
chr 1 and 2.
– Each bivalent usually has at least one chiasma for proper disjunction
during meiosis
- Sex-averaged recombination rates tend to be higher towards telomeres and lower at centromere-

18
Q

Also see huge variation - not specific to humans

A
  • Sperm crossovers occur across the region at 0.9 cM/Mb
  • The great majority (about 94%) of crossovers lie within hotspots, with 72%
    in hotspot DNA3 (narrow 1-2kb regions)
  • Hotspots are not randomly distributed but fall into clusters 60–90 kb apart
  • Hotspots vary considerably in peak intensity
19
Q

Myers et al. (2005; Science)

A

A human genome-wide data set with ~1.6 million SNPs
– The fine-scale recombination landscape is dominated by
recombination hotspots
– 80% of the recombination occurs in 10 to 20% of the sequence

20
Q

Kong et al., Nature, 2010

A

The Basonuclin-2 gene on chromosome 9
* Recombinations in this region are dominated by those resulting from male
meiosis.

Males and females are recombing at different extents- females aren’t recombining huge amounts

Whereas there’s a lot of recombination in males- can see these big hotspots

Males and females- very striking difference in recombination.

No recombination is happening when eggs are produced in females

21
Q

Recombination variation on chromosomes in males and females

A

the location of these hotspots differs in males and females

Recombination is higher in females but females recombine evenly across the whole chromosome

In males there’s a really strong effect of physical location, so they recombine more highly towards the ends of the chromosome than the centromere in the middle - don’t know why this variation exists

22
Q

Humans versus chimps (Auton et al. 2012; Science)

A

Overall genome-wide divergence = 1.23%
– The genomes of 10 Western chimpanzees
At the level of entire chromosomes, recombination rates are very similar in
humans and chimpanzees, with the exception of chromosome 2
– Human chromosome 2 which originated from a telomeric fusion of chimp
chr2a and chr2b in the human ancestral lineage
- No evidence of sharing of hotspots between species

23
Q

What determines the location of a hotspot

A

Search for specific sequence features (motifs) in hotspots

Recombination is important for determining the efficacy of selection

24
Q

Myers et al. (Nat Genet, 2008)

A

This study mapped a recombination rate across lots of different individuals

They Identified 22,599 autosomal and 608 X-linked hotspots
– They found a A degenerate 13-mer CCNCCNTNNCCNC highly enriched in recombination
hotspots
– 41% (±1.4%) of all human hotspots is determined by the
presence of the motif- plays an important role in the determination of these hotspots

25
Q

Myers et al. (Science, 2010)

A

Hotspots aren’t conserved between humans and chimps

22 loci orthologous between humans and chimps
– Hotspots in the human orthologues
– The 13-mer hotspot motif exists in both species at these loci
– The 13-mer does not recruit hotspots in chimps

They searched for genes that interacted with this 13- base pair motif and what they found was a zinc finger protein that could bind to the motif

A computational algorithm was used to search for zinc finger proteins in the
human genome that bind specificity for the 13-mer motif and match the
degeneracy pattern
– PRDM9 was predicted to be a highly probably candidate

26
Q

Oliver et al. (2009, PLoS Genet)

A

Rapid rate of functional sequence divergence between chimp
and human exceeds neutral expectations by 10x
– The rapid evolution of these PRDM9 zinc finger coding sequences is exceptional, with a nucleotide divergence of
7.1% – over fivefold higher than the overall genome-wide
divergence (1.23%)
– Amino acids positions that contact DNA bases have undergone frequent recurrent episodes of positive selection
Humans and chimpanzees don’t share hotspots because of the rapid rate of evolution of the PMRD9

27
Q

Losses of PRDM9 across vertebrates

A

Investigated 225 species of invertebrates to see whether there was the presence of PMRD9- found that even distantly related species have genes that produce the equivilent of this protein - broadly conserved gene even though its evolving very quickly - some species have lost PMRD9 completely and in other species bits of it have been lost/ deleted.

There has been a minimum of 6 partial and 3 converted losses - have important consequences for variation in recombination rate - if there are losses there might be different motifs in the species (hotspots will change- big variation in this species might be mediated by this rapidly evolving protein PMDR9