Lecture 10: Global Connections and Solutions Flashcards
Global water challenges facing the world
Population growth and
changing demographics
Unsustainable water use
Climate Change
Agricultural demand and
changing diets
We live in a connected world
Water Scarcity Hotspots
bb
The Potential for Water Conflicts
bb
Present and Potential Water Conflict Hotspots
bb
• As water supply decreases and demand increases/changes, tensions will
increase as different players try to access common water supplies
• Many conflicts are transboundary in nature, either between or within countries
Transboundary Rivers and Water Sharing
• There are 286 known global transboundary river basins.
• They span 151 countries, include more than 2.8 billion people (42% of the world’s
population), cover 62 million km2 (42% of the total land area of the Earth), and
produce around 22 000 km3 of river discharge each year (roughly 54% of the
global river discharge).
• The sharing of waters across boundaries poses difficult challenges. Equitable
use of their waters requires negotiation and agreement.
Dependency on Upstream Countries
The dependency ratio is a good indicator of where tension and conflict over watersharing
and use can occur. The map clearly depicts such areas including central
Asia, the Middle East (especially Syria and Iraq), India and Pakistan, and
surprisingly, low land countries such as the Netherlands.
International Water Issues and Hydropolitics
There are a number of ways in which water supply may affect international
politics:
• Control of Water Resources:
• Water supplies or access to water at the root of tensions
• Political Tool:
• Water resources, or water systems themselves, used by a nation, state
or non-state actors for a political goal
• Terrorism:
• Water resources, or water systems, as targets or tools of violence or
coercion by non-state actor
• Military Tool:
• Water resources, or water systems themselves, used by a nation or
state as a weapon during military action
• Military Target:
• Water resource systems as targets of military actions by nations or
states
• Development Disputes:
• Water resources or systems as source of contention in the context of
social and economic development
The Continuum of Conflict-Cooperation on Water
bb
Cooperation is more Frequent than Conflict
bb
Between 1918 and 1994, more than 200 treaties were signed; yet only 37 reported
cases of inter-state violence (mostly related to Israel).
Types of TB River Agreements
• Flow allocation or restrictions
• Water quality improvements or regulations
• Boundary demarcation
• Infrastructure development & use
• Process management: – Data sharing – Technical and financial cooperation – Informing and
prior consent – Joint management
International Water Law
• International water law can provide a framework for the development and implementation of transboundary agreements and treaties • Law can be in the form of: • Customary law • Bi- or multi-lateral treaties • General principles and conventions (international) • 1911 Madrid Declaration • 1966 Helsinki Rules • 1991 International Law Commission • 1992 Dublin Principles • 1997 UN Convention (not ratified)
Helsinki Rules - 1966
The Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers are
guidelines on how to regulate international rivers and groundwater, based on 37
articles:
• Applicable to all international basins, except where other agreements are
already in place between nations.
• The rules assert the rights of all bordering nations to an equitable share in
the water resources, with reasonable consideration of such factors as:
• past customary use
• balancing needs and demands
• …
• Some examples of articles:
• Article 4: Entitlement to a reasonable and equitable share in the
beneficial uses of the waters
• Article 6 precludes the inherent preference of any use over others
• Article 7 prohibits the denial of reasonable use to a basin state on the
basis of future uses of other states
• Note – no enforcement
Dublin Principles - 1992
Dublin Statement on Water and Sustainable Development, also known as the
Dublin Principles:
1. Principle No. 1: Fresh water is a finite and vulnerable resource, essential to
sustain life, development and the environment.
2. Principle No. 2: Water development and management should be based on a
participatory approach, involving users, planners and policy-makers at all
levels.
3. Principle No. 3: Women play a central part in the provision, management
and safeguarding of water.
4. Principle No. 4: Water has an economic value in all its competing uses and
should be recognised as an economic good.
When Does Conflict Occur?
• Factors that increase CONFLICT • Water and border disputes coincide • Disruptions of anthropogenic origin • Scarcity & variability in availability • Rate of change in the basin exceeds adaptive capacity
- Factors that increase COOPERATION
- Scarcity & variability in availability
- Linkages
- Collective action problem
• Factors posited as important, but relation to conflict undetermined • Population density • Overall GDP • Government type (democracy) • Overall relations between countries
Example of Hydropolitics: Nile River Basin
bb
Example of Hydropolitics: Water Issues in the
Middle East
bb
Water and Human Rights
• On 30 September 2010, the 15th Session of the UN Human Rights Council
passed Resolution A/HRC/15/L.14, recognizing the right to safe and clean
drinking water and sanitation as a human right that is essential for the full
enjoyment of life and all human rights.
• The idea of water being a human right is being gradually incorporated into
national laws and constitutional amendments
• S. Africa for example, legislated for households to receive a set volume of
water free of charge.
• In the UK it is illegal to cut off water supply because of non-payment – an
embedded right to water
However, due to the investment required to
meet a comprehensive right to water, let alone
sanitation, it has not been possible to gain
universal recognition of these human rights.
water and development
bb
The Challenges of Solving Water Insecurity
Despite its status as a vital resources to which everybody has a right, water is
now seen as a commodity for which a realistic price should be paid.
But what should the price be and who should pay for it?
Some history:
• The idea of conserving water through pricing and market forces took on in
the 1980-1990s
• This led to the beginning of privatization of water utilities assuming that this
would lead to conserve water, improve efficiencies, and increase service
spread.
• All consumers would be charged for water at the price it cost to capture,
treat and deliver it – cost recovery
• The UK led the way in the late 1980s, and other countries followed with
privatization of utilities in developing countries becoming a condition of
WB/IMF debt repayments and loans.
In some places it worked, in others it did not. Water services could not easily be
treated as other businesses – the primary reason is political
Integrated Water Resources Management
IWRM
• IWRM is intended to solve water conflict and insecurity through sustainable
development and management of water resources
• Emphasizes the river basin as the logical geographical unit for strategic
planning – making cooperation between basin partners even more critical
• Encompasses other components of
• sustainable development,
• environmental protection,
• food security, especially for the poor,
• appropriate choices regarding water use in economic productivity,
• good governance, including decentralization of decision making,
• reform of water managing institutions,
• effective regulation,
• cost recovery,
• investment and
• equitable pricing
Problematic at international level
• Integrated usage cuts across vested interests
• Requires an approach that recognizes that water is a limited resources and
that all withdrawals and pollution affect the well being of others
• Many political, admin, legal and jurisdictional barriers
• And varying physical social and economic conditions
• Corruption complicates things and can add to the problem and cost
IWRM and the Scale of Management
• IWRM is often best implemented at
small/community scale rather than national or
international
• Water issues are felt in common locally where
everyone has a stake in conservation and efficiency
• Women are a key part of local water management:
• Women’s role in drinking water and sanitation
services, including carrying out equipment
maintenance and minor repairs can be
important
• Village women normally have to collect water
and deal with sanitation and waste disposal so
they have a vested interest in service
performance than men. And frequently take
the lead in local water and sanitation
committees
• The introduction of sound water management
practices in low income areas should therefore
include women’s participation
IWRM at the International Level
– River Basin Authorities
The Niger Basin Authority defines its purpose as the promotion of cooperation
among member countries to ensure integrated development of resources,
particularly for water and hydroelectric resources. The NBA nations also use the
organisation to harmonise development of energy, agriculture, forestry, transport,
communications, and industrial resources of the member nations. Environmental
protection from the threats of desertification, deforestation and pollution of the rivers
by agriculture and industry have become a major theme of their work.
Many others around the
world:
Rhine
Mekong
Mosel
Danube
Elbe
Zambezi
Lake Chad
Often have no authority over
resources or management
Water Management in the UK
• Water and sewerage industry was privatised in
1989
• This evolved from 1000 individual suppliers in
1945 to Regional Water Authorities (1973) to
private water companies (1989)
• Regulatory framework (Ofwat) has been in
place to ensure that consumers receive high
standards of service at a fair price.
• Investments of > £108 billion in maintaining
and improving assets and services.
• The industry must also comply with national
and European legislation.
• Regulatory Framework includes DEFRA,
Welsh Govt, EU, Ofwat (Economic regulator),
Natural Resources Wales, EA, Drinking Water
Inspectorate, Consumer Council for Water
Who Owns the Water?
• Traditionally, water has been treated as a ‘commons’ good like air or fisheries in
international waters.
• However, this breaks down when there is excess demand for the resource -
‘tragedy of the commons’.
• In most legal systems, including English law, the ownership of the water to which
the abstraction licences apply depends on whether it is river water or underground
water.
• For flowing water (e.g., rivers), nobody owns the water — it is a commons
resource. Riparian rights (reasonable use rights) apply. These are typically
associated with landownership on the river bank and were developed as a
legal framework for fishing rights management, water use on the land
bordering the river, and similar.
• Conversely, for an underground water source on a single property, the water is
owned by the landowner. Abstraction rights are grafted onto these more
fundamental water ownership rights, for example, by ‘grandfathering’