lecture 13 - topics in Neuroscience Flashcards
(22 cards)
What is a clinical trial?
Clinical trials, in their purest form, are designed to observe outcomes of
human subjects under “experimental” conditions controlled by the scientist
The different stages of clinical trials
Classically clinical trials are divided into phases I-IV.
Phase 0:
Preclinical research
* Some studies (e.g. behaviour or lifestyle change studies) often do not fit neatly into those phases
* Some drug trials not fit into a single phase (e.g. some blend Phase I and II or II and III)
→ Easier to think of studies based on their developmental stages
The different stages of clinical trials
Phase I
- Generally done on healthy volunteers
- Estimate drug tolerance and characterize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
- Identify the maximally tolerated dose
- Provide early assessment of drug activity
Phase II
- Larger than Phase I trials (up to 100s)
- Involves a control (e.g. control group or pre vs post-treatment)
- Narrow inclusion criteria for participants
- Usually explore different doses
- Evaluate whether the drug has any biological activity or effect
Phase III
- Usually larger than Phase II trials (100s to 1000s)
- Fewer exclusion criteria
- Assess and confirm the effectiveness of the new intervention
- Monitor safety
=Phase III trials are limited in terms of:
- Size (100s or 1000s)
- Duration (weeks or months)
- Incomplete information about clinical outcomes (e.g. Drug approved based on intermediate outcomes or
biomarkers)
Phase IV:
Long term surveillance of an intervention believed to be effective in phase III trials
Design
- Parallel, crossover, and factorial design trials
- Based on the treatment structure, clinical trial designs are classified into parallel, crossover, and factorial
designs
Outcomes
variables that are monitored during a study to document the impact that a given intervention or
exposure has on the health of a given population.
primary vs secondary outcome measure
Primary outcome measure: variable that is the most relevant to answer the research question
* Secondary outcome measures: additional outcomes monitored to help interpret the results of
the primary outcome
consideration of outcomes
Outcomes should be stated a priori
➢ Sample size must be sufficient to detect effect of the intervention on the primary outcome
➢ Outcome suitability must be based on the research question and hypothesis
What is FXS?
- Neurodevelopmental disorder.
- X-linked, single-gene disorder caused by the absence or deficiency of the fragile X messenger
ribonucleoprotein (FMRP). - Leading single-gene cause of and ASD intellectual disabilities.
FMRP
- FMR1 encodes for the Fragile X protein (FMRP).
- FMRP is an mRNA-binding protein
- Binds to approximately 4% of all mRNA in the mammalian brain
- including several that encode proteins which have been implicated in ASD (TSC2, PTEN, Neuroligin3, Neurexin1,
SHANK3 and NF1) - It is expressed ubiquitously and is particularly abundant in the brain and in testicles.
- FMRP is mainly involved in regulating mRNA metabolism, controlling many steps leading to protein
production
mGluR theory of FXS
Testing the mGluR theory of FXS
Clinical trials - Lovastatin
- An open-label study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of lovastatin in FXS:
- Significant improvement in aberrant behaviour (primary outcome measure)
- Significant improvement in 12 secondary outcome measures.
- Follow-up randomized controlled trial:
- Failed to replicate these findings
- No clear benefit of lovastatin over placebo.
- Two additional clinical trials:
- Awaiting results
Key issues with the methodology and design of the trials:
- Timing and length of trial:
- Trials were done in adults and adolescents → Might have missed the critical time window
- Earlier in life treatment is initiated, the better the chance may be of success
- Outcome measure:
- Primary outcome measures were mostly questionnaires-based → large placebo response.
- Need for objective measures of core phenotypes, such as direct assessments of cognition and
language, and biomarkers - Measuring disease modification in neurodevelopmental disorders:
- FXS-specific drug treatment could enact improvements in neurobiological parameters that may
actually enhance learning over time as a primary readout versus quickly providing behavioural
symptomatic relief. - If true, trials need to pair new treatments with learning interventions measuring cognitive and
developmental outcome
Clinical trials – lessons learned
Clinical trial study design :
* Reliance on post-hoc analyses of preliminary studies in making critical subsequent clinical trial study
design decisions for larger, more pivotal studies examining efficacy → risk of it being based on type II
error
* Study participant:
* Stratification of participants
* Performed on “high functioning” individuals → not representative of FXS
From the preclinical side:
- Animal model:
- Are genetically homogenous inbred mice raised in controlled settings a good model for humans?
- Translatable outcome:
- There are no clear correlates between outcomes employed in FXS animal studies and outcomes
employed in initial human FXS clinical trials. - For example: a drug may correct protein synthesis, dendritic spine morphology, learning, and
audiogenic seizure deficits in the Fmr1 KO mouse. Then, in human studies, outcomes include parent-
report checklists focused on interfering behaviour, mood, anxiety, inattention, and adaptive
behaviour.