lecture 2 Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

the art of effective and persuasive speaking or
writing

A

Rhetoric –

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deliberate use of language to effect change in thoughts,
feelings, and actions.

A

rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to Bitzer (1968), it is the situation which calls the
rhetorical discourse into existence.

A

Rhetorical Situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“Prerequisite” to a rhetorical discourse.

A

Rhetorical Situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

refers to background information that is necessary to
understand historical and/or situational circumstances of the
person, event, and/or idea.

A

context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Any time anyone is trying to make an argument, one is doing so out
of a particular context.

A

rhetorical situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Problem addressed by
rhetorical discourse.

A

exigence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

An imperfection, defect,
obstacle, unaccomplished
tasks, or something that is
other than it should be

A

exigence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

People or individuals
whose thoughts and
behaviors can be
influenced by a Rhetorical
Discourse

A

audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • Mediators of change
A

audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

People, events, objects,
and relations that have
the power to influence the
decisions and actions of
the audience to
modify the exigence

A

CONSTRAINTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

These can include –
beliefs, attitudes,
documents, facts,
traditions, images,
interests, motives, etc

A

constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When can an exigence be considered not
rhetorical?

A
  1. If it cannot be modified;
  2. If it can be modified ONLY by means other than discourse;
  3. When its modification requires merely one’s own action or
    the application of a tool, but NEITHER REQUIRES NOR
    INVITES the assistance of discourse.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When can an exigence be considered
rhetorical?

A
  1. Capable of positive modification; and
  2. When positive modification requires discourse or can be
    assisted by discourse.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does the Rhetorical Situation require an audience all the time?

A

NO, a rhetorical situation does not require an audience of all
the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Condor et al. (2013) – mostly concerned with strategies
used in constructing persuasive messages in debates and
disputes

A

Political Rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

facilitates the making and hearing of representation claims spanning subjects and
audiences .

A

rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

requires a deliberative
system with multiple components whose linkage
often needs rhetoric.” (Dryzek, 2010)

A

democracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

the character projected by the
speaker

A

ethos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Aristotle argued that audiences could be swayed not only by the style and
content of an argument, but also the

A

character projected by the
speaker (ethos)

21
Q

According to Aristotle, [blank] is the capacity of discovering in any particular case the
available means of persuasion.

22
Q

The responsibility of bringing this discourse into existence
rests on the

23
Q

functions to produce change within a situation
through the use of discourse.

24
Q

These constraints can generally be classified into two:

A

(1) those originated
or managed by the speaker; and (2) other constraints arising out of the situation.

25
has been used to expose ineffective policies and advance necessary changes in democratic societies.
rhetoric
26
required loud voices and formal gestures in order to be effective.
political oratory
27
three means of persuasion by Aristotle
ethos or ethical appeal pathos or emotional appeal logos or logical appeal
28
ethos
ethical appeal
29
pathos
emotional appeal
30
logos
logical appeal
31
the attitude of a perceiver toward a source of information at a given time.
ethos
32
it is an audience member’s evaluation of the speaker’s character.
ethos
33
ethos is based on the
perceiver not the source
34
what is tthe aim of ethos
to show sincerity and the trustworthiness of the speaker
35
often deal with audience members who subscribe to a wide range of beliefs.
political communicators
36
“single rhetorical identity
a group bound by an overarching characteristic.
37
three requirements must be met in order to be an effective political leader
1) diverse communities must be regrouped into a single identity category. 2) the leader’s propositions must fulfill the needs of this category. 3) the leader must present him/ herself as a prototypical in-group member
38
political sphere is invariably tied with
rhetorical discourse
39
The persuasive quality of a piece of information is also affected by
reach
40
refers to the number of people who can access the information at any given time
multiplicity
41
encourages an oral and casual style
speed
42
encourages redundant and repetitive postings
speed
43
permits communicattion among multiple particiapants in an array of media and thus the development of communities of interest on a global scale
reach
44
it does not include the benefits of gatekeeping
reach
45
encourages experiments in self and gender identities
anonymity
46
the hostile expression of strong emotions
anonymity
47
permits closer access to other people with increased opportunities for discussion and feedback
interactivity
48
permits increased opportunities for intrusion upon personal privacy
interactivity