Lecture 2 Flashcards
(44 cards)
I-frame
Focuses on individual behaviour, habits, and decision-making (e.g., nudges, personalized interventions).
You know the environment that you have to play with and you are trying to change an individual’s behaviour in that context.
I-frame interventions don’t fundamentally change the rules of the game, but make subtle adjustments to help fallible individuals play the game better.
You are not changing the policy or the structures in society, but you are changing people to behave in a situation that is already given.
S-frame
Systemic approach, focusing on institutional and environmental factors (e.g., policies, systems, structures).
We are not putting all the responsibility on an individual, as a government/company we also have a responsibility to structure the situation for people so that they can behave better.
Why don’t we change the rules of the game instead of putting people in a spot where they have to change as a person?
What kind of frame is nudging?
An i-frame
Similarities and differences of the i-frame and s-frame
Both frames are aimed at changing behaviour, but the approach in changing someone’s behaviour is different.
Which frame is better? The i-frame or the s-frame?
It is not necessary to choose either the i-frame or s-frame, they are just two perspectives that you can take. It enlarges the perspective of things that you can look at when changing behaviour.
That said, s-frame solutions, when they are possible, tend to be more effective. However, when you change the rules, it might still be helpful to add i-frame solutions as well. So, you can often combine the two.
Wat kind of frame is posting an advertisement on social media or a billboard across the street that says “More than 1000 people under 30 have visited this shop”, and why?
This is an i-frame solution because it’s social proof and a nudge.
What is the promise of nudging?
“Small changes can make a big difference”
What kind of frame/approach is the following?
Giving people feedback on their energy use, you give them feedback on how much energy they use, compared to all neighbours and efficient neighbours. The idea is that if you see the difference people will want to behave as well as or better than their neighbours.
An i-frame
Which frame proved much more effective in reducing smoking rates across the population?
The s-frame solutions.
They created an environment that helped people to stop or not start smoking.
They also made it less socially acceptable, more expensive and less convenient.
Aim: Increasing of social engagement between employees in a company who work in cubicles.
I-frame solution: personally stimulating people to engage more with each other and the company via an app where they can see who else is in the office to meet them.
Would this type of solution alone help? If no, what would?
It is perhaps part of the solution.
But, taking down the walls will probably help much better. Sitting in a cubicle with walls gives little room for interaction with coworkers.
Combining s-frame and i-frame solutions is usually a good idea.
Aim: A hardware store mostly has clients aged 50+ and they want to also attract gen-Z (<30).
They could post an advertisement on social media or a billboard across the street that says “More than 1000 people under 30 have visited this shop.”
Would this type of solution alone help? If no, what would?
No. It probably won’t grab your attention that much and you want the store to have something to offer you.
Based on research there is one hardware shop in the US that has a lot of gen-Z population there. They have gained popularity among gen-Z especially because they have a lot of community. They have small shops in small communities and they are very cozy, they function as neighbourhood meeting spots. They are also very visible on TikTok and they are active on social media.
This is a s-frame solution because the structure and the rules of the game are changed.
This is also a g-frame solultion because it creates a shared identity through the community.
G-frame
Focusing on group memberships and associated group dynamics (e.g., interventions based on social identities).
What was the commentary of Bingley et al. on Chater & Lowenstein, 2023?
“Focusing on systemic, ‘big-picture’ solutions alone will not in itself result in more effective public policy because this approach too fails to engage with these same group memberships and associated group dynamics.
They argue that behavioural scientists and policymakers need not just to resort to an s-frame, but in addition to develop and employ a g-frame – a group-level analysis.”
An s-frame is not enough, you need a third frame, the g-frame.
What is Extinction Rebellion an example of?
Of how you can operationalize a g-frame solution: starting a movement/community.
How can you accelerate behavioural change?
By making a distinctive movement/community with a strong identity.
How did Extinction Rebellion (XR) become so big?
Their slogan “Rebel for Life”, resonated with many, making the movement inclusive and transforming scepticism into solidarity.
They have a flat hierarchy, empowering all voices and thus being inclusive.
- On the one hand being very specific, clear and different from others, distinctive, and on the other hand being inclusive and opening up to others.
They had a lot of media attention
- When you are radical, surprise people and the visuals are very distinctive, you are going to get media attention, which will increase your appeal.
Making allies is very helpful, because people that like the allies will also start to get interested.
Confronting people
- Having an enemy is a good thing when building a distinctive movement (us vs them).
- It strengthens the identity and causes more media attention
How can every frame be used to encourage FARC guerillas to demobilize? And would it work?
I-frame: flyers through the jungle? No
S-frame: get rid of the jungle? No
G-frame: operation Christmas => yes
Give an example of how g-framing can help solve behavioural problems
It can be used to encourage FARC guerillas to demobilize.
First: research; they interviewed FARC members that had demobilized.
Second: implementation
- Providing guerillas an opportunity to go home and celebrate Christmas with their families.
- Nine massive trees were decorated with blue Christmas lights that turned on with a motion sensory when guerillas walked by.
- Next to each tree there was a poster with the prominent slogan: “IF Christmas can come to the jungle, you can come home. Demobilize. At Christmas, everything is possible.”
- The messages on the trees were emotionally charged, aimed at reminding the guerillas of their roles as family members and love ones, rather than just soldiers or revolutionaries.
o They tried to make the family identity more salient than the guerrilla identity.
Follow up: soccer campaigns
o They dropped footballs with the message “Demobilize. Let’s play again.”
Why does acting in groups accelerate behaviour change?
- Shared identity: group identity fosters a strong in-group identity among members, enhancing solidarity and collective efficacy.
- Normative influence: a shared identity creates in-group norms that encourage normative behaviour, as individuals feel compelled to conform to the values of their group.
- Cognitive reframing: participation in collective actions can shift individuals’ self-concepts, helping people view themselves as agents of change, which enhances their commitment.
- Emotional engagement: collective events often evoke strong emotions, reinforcing participants’ connections to the cause and motivating sustained engagement.
I-frame vs s-frame vs g-frame
For every problem, you can think of these three approaches.
You can combine two or three approaches.
Need for relatedness
Social identity connects to the relatedness of the self-determination theory.
It is an evolutionary need, in humans and animals, because not being in a group is dangerous.
This is also why people really dislike being excluded/ostracized.
Being excluded is something that causes real physical pain (shown in brain research).
Grooming
This is an example of feeling relatedness/belongingness.
Monkeys groom 20% of the time. Humans also spend 20% of their time on social contacts. Of that, 60% is spent on the 5 most important contacts.
Instead of grooming, we have alternatives that also give endorphins, which helps with relaxations, bonding with others and is a natural painkiller.
What do non-grooming animals do?
- Laugh together, dance, make music, sport, synchronize, etc.
- These all give a feeling that we belong somewhere.
- Synchronizing is something that is naturally pleasurable to us.
The relationship between faith and happiness
This is an example of feeling relatedness/belongingness.
In rich countries there is no relationship between faith and happiness. However, in poor countries, believers are a little happier but this is especially the case when this has the function of creating a community. So it is important to share faith with others.
Magh Kumbh Mela
This is an example of feeling relatedness/belongingness.
Huge religious event in India
The biggest event in the world
It is every 12 years
Research shows that people who go there experience a heightened well-being for at least a month after going.