Lecture 2 - Development ToM Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

What is the Theory of Mind

A

Insight people hold mental states and these govern behaviour (act according our perception reality)
Allows make sense social world - predict and explain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Desire-based ToM?

A

Desires are idiosyncratic (personal and subjective) constantly changing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Do children understand that other people may have desires that differ from theirs?

A

Repacholi and Gopbik 1997
18 month olds but not 14 month olds understood experimenters desired food differed from their own

Understanding desire is subjective mental state that differs from person to person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Belief Based ToM?

A

Distinction between mind and world
Requires notion person has representation of world, contents of which may be quite different from contents of world itself
Shift from situation based to representation based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are false belief tasks

A

Test whether child can represent what another person believes in contrast to their own beliefs or reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the FB Sally-Ann Task

A

One object is moved from one location to next without child watching
Sally puts ball in basket. Ann moves ball to box without Sally watching.
Child asked where Sally will look for ball

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the consequence of the Sally-Ann task?

A

Child has to inhibit own knowledge of ball in box and understand their is a FB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Maxi task of FB?

A

Maxi puts chocolate in his cupboard. Whilst he is out playing his mother puts it in fridge. Maxi comes back wanting his chocolate. Child asked where Maxi will look.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Results of Maxi FB task

A

Poor performance (failure understand FB) children under 5 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who investigated the Smartie Task of FB?

A

Perner 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the smartie task of FB?

A

Child shown smarties tube. Guess what is inside
Then shown pencils inside
Pencils put back in and sealed
Then asked what their friend would think is in the smarties tube
Age 3 poor performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Gopnik add to the Smartie Tube Test

A

Asked children when you first saw the tube what did you think was inside it
3-4 yrs old difficulty with this task

Can only consider current mental state not previous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Interpreting the findings of FB tasks

A

3 years old usually fail
4 years old usually pass
Around this age acquire ToM
Stage like development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Do FB tasks underestimate younger children’s ability?

A

Lack of story or question comprehension - question doesn’t make sense

Can younger children show better performance when tasks are simplified?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happens when we clarify the test question for FB tasks

A

Siegel and Beattie 1991
“Where will Maxi look first of all?”
Performance improves at 3 years but not significantly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who investigated the BIG DEBATE on development of children

A

Wellman at al 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Who are the 2 opposing sides of the BIG DEBATE

A

Boosters

Scoffers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What do the Boosters believe in the BIG DEBATE

A

Early onset view
Early competence masked by performance limitations
Task manipulations May enhance performance
3 year olds be able perform above Chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What do the Scoffers believe in the BIG DEBATE

A

Delayed onset view
Conceptual change in understanding
Developmental change on FB tasks reflect genuine conceptual change
Task demands/processing limitations should not account completely for performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Wellman, Cross and Watson 2001: meta analysis of 178 studies

A

Support substantial development over pre-school years

Below 3.5 years 80% incorrect systematically choosing own belief

4 years 50% correct

56 months 75% correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What variables improved performance on Wellmans et al meta analysis

A

Deceptive motive
Active participation
Salience if mental state improve performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Summary of Wellmans et al 2001 meta analysis

A

In line with conceptual change
In line with Scoffers account
Manipulating variables improved performance across all ages
None improved performance of 3 year olds above Chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What 2 factors contribute to ToM development?

A

Social experience

Biological maturation

24
Q

Outline social experience contributing to ToM development?

A

Aiding understanding mental states

Arises from interactions from other people

25
Outline biological maturation contributing to ToM development?
Enables children to express their understanding of mental states arising from improvement in executive functioning
26
What does Harris 1999 see as the Role of Experience
Conversations crucial exposing children to other people’s perspectives Provide children with vocabulary needed discuss and reflect on mental states
27
What is the role of experience of ToM
Children with older siblings show earlier ToM - more exposure Older siblings talk about what they want Children whose parents talk about mental states more understanding FB earlier than other children
28
What is the Universality of Cross-Cultural Comparisons of ToM
Callaghan et al 2005 Peru, India, Canada, Thailand consistent findings of failure at 3 years old but could express understanding at 5 years Industrialised and rural societies show similar developmental shift between 3 and 5 years
29
Who created the ToM scale
Wellman and Liu 2004
30
What is the ToM scale
Diverse Desires Diverse Beliefs Knowledge Access False Belief Hidden Emotions
31
What are diverse desires and diverse beliefs
Diverse desires: people can have different desires for same thing Diverse beliefs: people can have different beliefs about same situation
32
What is knowledge access, false belief and hidden emotions
Knowledge Access: something can be true, but someone might not know that False Belief: something can be true, but someone may falsely believe something different Hidden Emotions: someone can feel one way but display a different emotion
33
What across Cross Cultural differences did Wellman et al 2006 find
Children in Western countries have diverse beliefs before understanding knowledge access Chinese and Iranian children had knowledge access before diverse beliefs
34
What can explain Wellman et als 2006 cross cultural differences
Differences in cultural values Collectivist - parents don’t tolerate children holding independent views vs Individualism
35
What is the role of executive functioning
Children’s failures on ToM tasks may stem not from pure conceptual limitations but rather from problems translating conceptual knowledge into successful action Critical role executive functions ability pass TM tasks
36
What are Executive Functions and what are the 3 main Executive functions
Set domain general cognitive abilities help us control and guide our attention and behaviour 1. Inhibition 2. Cognitive Flexibility 3. Working Memory
37
What is inhibition in executive functioning
Ignoring distracting info or suppressing unwanted responses Preventing reaching for bar chocolate Bear/Dragon Task. STROOP Impulsivity/Inhibition not developed by 3 years can’t inhibit in Maxi Task where they know where chocolate is
38
What is cognitive flexibility in executive functioning
Responding to same thing in different ways depending on context Multiple passwords Wisconsin card sorting task. Task switching paradigm
39
What is Working Memory in executive functioning
Holding important info or goal in mind Manipulating info in head Mental shopping list. Mental arithmetic. Digit span. Spatial span.
40
Role of Executive Functioning in FB tasks
Cognitive Inhibition/ disengage from salient real world attend to intangible abstract representation Response Inhibition: inhibit a prepotent or habitual way responding I.e. pointing to true location of object Working memory: indicate correct answer whilst holding in mind 2 different and conflicting representations
41
When do Executive Functions develop
Develop frontal lobes takes long time Important developments in inhibitory control take placed first 6 years life. Marked improvement between 3-6 - Diamond and Taylor 1996
42
Role of Executive Functioning in FB task of Bear/Dragon
Bear = good. Dragon = bad. Bear asks us to do something we do it. Dragon asks do something we do not. Development in inhibitory control and ToM May be related IC affects emergence and expression mental state knowledge of ToM development
43
Who investigated the Bear/Dragon Paradigm
Carlson and Moses 2001 Sabbagh et al 2007
44
Implicit understanding of FB Moll et al 2016
Investigated children’s facial expressions as indices of their belief understanding 3 years: aware conflict between persons belief and reality showing signs suspense - lip biting, brow furrowing when observing FB
45
Implicit understanding of FB Clements and Perner 1994
Period implicit understanding FB precedes onset of explicit Unexpected transfer task 86% over 2 years 11 months implicit measure of looking pattern was indicative FB understanding
46
Southgate, Senju and Csibra 2007 implicit measures FB
Anticipatory looking earlier FB understanding Bear puts something in box then women turns away and does not see bear moving it into another box Non-verbal prompt. Toy removed from scene avoid reality bias
47
Earlier FB understanding in infancy - Onishi and Baillargeon 2005
Nonverbal Task year implicit FB understanding in 15 month olds Violation of Expectancy method
48
Who investigate Violation of Expectancy method
Onishi and Baillargeon 2005
49
What is the Violation of Expectancy method telling us
If infant looks longer at inconsistent even taken as evidence that they are surprise Indicates some level knowledge about what should happen
50
Outline Onishi and Baillargeon 2005 study on looking time in 15 month olds
Woman puts toy in box. Toy is moved when woman not looking. Woman comes back and either searches in original location or where it actually is.
51
Outline results of Onishi and Baillargeon 2005
FB understanding look for longer when she looks in correct location = potion of Expectancy Infants expect searching be consistent with their beliefs about object location not objects reality ToM is innate?
52
What is Heyes 2014 criticism of FB tasks
Infants may represent events in these experiments as colours, shapes, and movements rather than as actions on objects by agents
53
Theory-Theory ToM Rules
Form and revise coherent set rules. Failure due to incorrect or misapplied rules. Initially relation between seeing and knowing. Rigidly follow: seeing/being told = knowing (Access rule)
54
Evidence of Access Rule
3-4yrs attribute knowledge to observer who sees or it told content of container. Ignorance oversteer with neither informational access
55
What is the No-Access rule
Overapplication Over extend rule to form rule that: not seeing or being told = ignorance I walk -> I walk-ed I run -> I run-ed
56
Evidence for No-Access Rule
Attribute ignorance observer who has not seen/being told even if observer some other source information about ever Ignore non-visual sources of info
57
Sodian and Wimmer 1987 study on Over Application of Rules
Child not shown contents container e.g. m&ms bag. Told they took something out bag and put it in box. Over 6yrs understand it was m&m. Asked if someone else same info know it was an m&m believed no = inference neglect Knowledge = inference without awareness