lecture 2) visual dev cont and motor deev Flashcards
do infants show a prerence to new or familiar stim
familiar stim
what will causee infants to. shift their preference to a novel stim
prolongued or repeated exposure
true or false: prolongued or reepeated exposure to a sttim wil lcause infants tto shift their preeference to a novel stim
true
what determines whether an infant will show a familiar or novelty preference
lenght of exposure
short exposure = what type of prefernce
familiarity
long exposure = what type of prefernce
novelty
what is the main implication for the familiary vs novelty preference
exposure time in lab induced preference produces need to be long enough for the baby to become familiar with the stimulis but short enough so that they dont get bored (habituation)
what is the trial and duration of preference procedures
there is usually only one familiarzation trial that is brief
what is the trial and duration of the habituation paradigm
they need to repeat the preesentation of a stimulus enough times to ensure that the infant is bored
(many trials)
what is the definition of boredom
usually indexed as 50% reduction in looking time for 3 trials in a row compared to intial trials
what is perceptual constancy
the perception of objects as being constant in size, shape, colour etc in spite of physical differences in retinal image of the object
give an example of perceptual constancy in adults
when door is opening and closing the shape changes but we are sttill have to perceive the door as rectabgle rgardless
in the study about perceptual constancy in fancts what were they testing
if perceptual constancy preseent from birth
in the study about perceptual constancy in infants, what paradigm did theey use
habituation paradigm
explain tthe habitation for the perceptual constancy experiment
repeadly show infant a small cube
cube shown at diff distances at each trial (causing retinal image to changee from trial to trial)
= do infants perceive these as the same object or as diff objects
explain tthe test for the perceptual constancy experiment
show infant the orinal (smaller cube) and an identical larger cube but the larger one was further away so that both cubes projected the same size retinal image
if baby had perceptual constancy (understand that distance does not physically change tthe object), what would their reaction be to the cubes
they sbould look att the larger cube longer since they are used tio tge smaller cube
if baby did not have perceptual constancy (understand that distance does not physically change tthe object), what would their reaction be to the cubes
they will look ewually at botth cubes
if infants looked longer at the larger. but further away cube in the perceptual constancy test, what does this indiicate
that they see the large cube as different in size from the original smaller cube (even if it seems the same size)
=means that infants saw the repeated presentations of the original, small cube as a single object of small consttant size, even though the retinal image varied
what did tthe results of the perceptual constancy in infantst suggest
that perceptual consatncy is present from birth
what is object segregation
the ability to identigy tthat objects are seperate from each other
what is the most important cue for infancts in terms of object segregated
movement
(seperate objects move independantly of each other)
what was the question of study for oobject segregation in infatnts
if object segreation present from birth
is perceptual constnactt present from birth
yes