Lecture 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Joe LeDoux

A

Joe LeDoux & his team published many influential studies on fear learning and fear circuits in rodents (he’s famous for his studies on the amygdala). More recently he has stopped using the word ‘fear’ or ‘emotion’ to describe his findings with non-human animals. He now talks about “survival behaviors” and “survival circuits”. It was a conscious deicision to avoid the usual sloppiness in how scientists use the term “emotion”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Questions to ask about emotions

A
  • What do emotions do?
  • What causes emotions?
  • What is caused by emotions?
    These questions try to help define emotion in terms of its functions. We need to be intentional in the way we define emotion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Emotions are functional states

A

Emotions are states of the brain (in that they can be implemented in the brain). But if we define emotions literally by their brain state, we need different definitions for humans, flies, octopus because they have completely different nervous systems. Emotion is a functional state but it’s still separable from the brain states associated with the emotion. A more abstract definition can be more useful and broadly applicable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to define emotions functionnally?

A

We need a functional account of emotions that defines emotions in terms of the stimuli that cause the brain state and the behaviours, etc., that are caused by the brain state. Functional definitions identify states by their causal relations (i.e. what does it do?) NOT by how they are constituted (i.e. what is it made of?). Functional definitions describe causal effects in an abstract manner that is independent of the physical way that that the state is implemented. Functional definitions are generalizable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How to define a clock?

A

“A device that measures time”. By defining a clock by its function (measuring time) we have a definition that is broadly applicable to a category. The definition we use influences how we categorize and differentiate things. Is a broken clock a clock? Is a computer clock (on which you can’t directly read the time, but makes your computer indicate the time) a clock?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Functional definition of mental states

A

We can define mental states in terms of their causal relations to inputs and outputs
* Emotions are functional states that are caused by sensory inputs and cause behavioural outputs
* Emotions can also be caused by and cause changes in other mental states (e.g. memory, perception, attention etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Architecture for emotions as functional states (Fan-in, fan-out structure)

A

Stimuli influence the central emotional state, which influences:
- Observed behavior (not always conscious)
- Subjective reports (always conscious)
- Psychophysiology
- Cognitive changes
- Somatic responses
Context and volitional control both have a moderating effect on the emotional state and the resulting behavior. This architecture provides foundation for neuroscientific research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Generalization (in the architecture for emotions as functional states)

A

A single emotional state can be elicited by many stimuli, and can elicit many different behaviors. Stimuli and behavior are indirect evidence of the emotional state. Stimuli can be external and/or internal: behavior can become a stimulus that influences the emotional state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The role of context in emotions

A

Context has a moderating effect on emotions. It can influence the stimuli we encounter and the effects of thos stimuli. This is proof of that emotion is not a reflex: a reflex will stay the same across contexts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Volitional control of emotion

A

Volitional control can inhibit emotion. We can influence our own emotional response. Volitional control can intervene in several different places/times of the process. It is conscious by nature, but there could also be some unconscious influences on emotional states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Architecture for emotions as functional states: example of fear research

A

Scientists will use a frightening stimulus (ex. a spider), and see the resulting processes (fear, survival behavior, etc.). Context is important: seeing a spider in an insectarium and in a bed will elicit different emotional states. Other cognitive states can also influence emotional states - for example knowing that the spider is harmless. Finally, volitional control can happen: you can try to control your fear response, and overcome the feeling of fear itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does an emotion “do”? What is its function?

A

We can also have a functional account in evolutionary terms that explains why an emotion is adaptive and what purpose it served in the evolutionary environment. Anything that evolved via natural selection is selected based on its functional effect for an organism in its given environment. The adpative functions of emotions may not be immediately clear. Ultimately, we need a fucntional explanation of emotion at the level of the entire organism and how it interacts with its environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The use of functional definitions

A

Functional definitions of emotion states are useful because they can generalizet, theoretically (e.g. to different animals, to robots). However, it is an empirical question whether emotions can be embodied in all brains or even in systems that are not brains is an empirical question. It may turn out that there are limits on the kinds of systems that can instantiate emotion, even once emotion is more fully understood. We don’t know the answer to this yet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Type identity

A

When you experience an instance of emotion e.g. joy, this corresponds to a pattern of brain activity and this is different from the pattern of activity when you experience another emotion e.g. fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Questions about type identity (ex. of fear)

A
  • Is the brain activity when you feel fear today the same as when you experienced fear last week?
  • Is it the same as when your friend experiences fear?
  • Is it similar to when your cat experiences fear?
  • How similar at the neurobiological level are different instances of fear?
  • How can we measure this similarity?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The problem of ‘type identity

A

Even though any instance of emotion is a brain state, it is less clear if a particular type of emotion (e.g. fear) corresponds to a type of brain state. This is the problem of ‘type
identity’ i.e. how does emotion state map to brain state (is it the same every time for a particular emotion? Is there some overlap? Is it completely different every time?)

17
Q

Observing emotions

A

Observing an organism’s behavior (in its natural environment) reveals whatemotions do and so what type of emotion a brain mechanism might implement. Behavioral readouts are necessary to interpret brain states. To be able to see the similarities in brain states related to emotions, we need behavioral readouts.

18
Q

Emotions and the brain

A

How to assign physical brain states to functional categories of specific emotions is an empirical question. It may be that even a single human brain can implement emotion in many different ways (like Lisa Feldman
Barret says). Or there may be only one way to implement emotion by a particular circuit architecture. The truth is likely somwhere in between. It is plausible that evolution arrived at several different mechanisms for implementing an overlapping set of computational functions that work together to coordinate an emotion state. Neurobiology (analysis of brain functions) and behavioral research could help us define emotions.

19
Q

Malfunction and psychiatric disorder

A

Understanding the proper function of emotion also leads to the study of when emotions ‘malfunction’ and are not serving an evolved adaptive function. We can conceptualize disorders as an inappropriate application of emotion (ex. PTSD, depression…). For example, a
clock could be used for other reasons than for measuring time (ex. a hammer, a paperweight…)

20
Q

PTSD and adaptation

A

Adaptation is relative to context. Emotions
may not be adaptive in these contexts. For example, fear in post traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD). Symptoms of PTSD could be adaptive in the context of immediate threat (e.g. a warzone) but become maladaptive in another context (e.g. in a safe home environment). Affective neuroscience can help us understand how to restore the adaptive function of emotion.

21
Q

Feelings

A

The conscious experience of emotions. They are often considered the defining feature of an emotion (because they’re so salient to us), but feelings are just one aspect of emotion.

22
Q

Problems with studying feelings

A

Explaining feelings requires explaining consciousness (which is extremely hard). This also limits the ability to study emotions in animals. It influences how we study emotions across people from different cultures who may describe their feelings differently. So, consciousness and feelings are a problem left to cognitive scientists, while neuroscientists study emotions (functionnally). Functional definitions can eventually be used to study feelings, but feelings and the words we use to describe emotion are unlikely to be a reliable starting point.

23
Q

Our conscious experience is not veridical

A

Feelings are a kind of conscious experience, meaning it’s not a reliable source of evidence. Our brains construct our conscious experience. This conscious ‘reality’ is not infallible and selectively presents
elements of some external (or internal) reality.

24
Q

Vision and beliefs

A

Conscious visual experience is constructed. What we experience as vision is an incomplete representation of the external visual world (ex. because of cognitive restraints, receptor restraints, etc.). We have the sense that we are consciously aware of everything in our visual field yet experiments and day to day experiences disprove this. We need to be attentive to what we want to see - attention is necessary for conscious perception.

25
Q

Other problems with feelings

A

Equating emotions with feelings raises the problem of attributing conscious experience to animals. This is part of Joe LeDoux’s concerns about talking about emotion in non-human animals. If an animal has feelings then they have consciousness. But how can we know about the conscious experience of emotions in non-human animals? Or even in other humans?

26
Q

Separating the study of emotions from the study of conscious experience

A

We need to define “emotion” in a scientific way, as something separate from conscious experience. Just like vision scientists study vision using behavioral measures without studying visual consciousness. Conscious experience can be separated from behavior and other functional measures

27
Q

Blindsight

A

There are anecdotal reports of people with blindsight avoiding obstacles without consciously knowing that there were some. This demonstrates that indeed, conscious experience can be separated from behavior and other functional measures.

28
Q

So, how to study emotions?

A
  • Use behavior, and neurobiology as a
    foundation, not self-reported feelings
  • There is still room for studying
    feelings as one aspect of emotion
  • The starting point should operationalize emotion in a way that allows for a science of emotion across different kinds of data and scientific disciplines e.g. ethologist studying animal behaviour, psychologists studying the mind, and neurobiologists recording the activity of the brain
  • None of these pursuits require consciousness.
29
Q

Lecture 1 key points

A
  • We need a functional approach to understanding emotions: define emotions by what they do, not how they are physically implemented
  • A functional approach to emotions also implies the possibility of ‘malfunctions’ when emotional behavior is not adaptive in the context
  • Feelings are not the same as emotions.We can study emotion without tackling consciousness.