Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Social psych > Lecture 3 - conformity > Flashcards

Lecture 3 - conformity Flashcards

1
Q

Social influence

A

A change in behavior caused by real or imagined pressure

  • Key = some form of bx change
  • intention may or may not play a role
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of social influence

A
  1. Conformity
  2. Compliance
  3. Obedience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conformity

A

Behavior change designed to match the behavior of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Compliance

A

Behavior change that occurs as a result of a direct request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Obedience

A

Compliance that occurs in response to a directive from an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do ppl conform?

A
  1. Informational Social Influence

2. Normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Informational social influence

A
  • due to a desire to gain information
  • Stronger and more enduring effect (people are internalizing these norms)
  • E.g., Fire alarm goes off – What do you do? You look to others to see what to do
    • Key = ambiguous situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Normative social influence

A
  • Social influence in which behavior is changed to conform to a social norm
  • Social influence due to a desire to gain rewards and/or avoid punishment
  • NOT ambiguous situation
  • May not internalize norms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2 factors in normative social infl

A
  1. Input from others serves as clue to nature of norm in effect
  2. Size and unanimity of majority informs strength of norm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sherif’s (1935) Study of the Development of Social Norms found

A
  • A social norm developed in each group
  • Once participants left the group, the norm continued to influence judgments
  • Conformity occurred even when others made extreme judgments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Autokinetic Effect

A

An optical illusion in which a stationary point of light appears to move in a dark room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Asch’s (1951) Study of Conformity: A Line Judgment Task

A
  • Participants conformed to the confederates’ judgments –> 76% conformed at least once
  • When alone - judgments 93% accurate
  • Easier to conform than dissent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Distortion of perception

A

Come to doubt your own senses; Maybe they really agreed with the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Distortion of judgment

A

Lacked confidence in their own assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Psychological reactance

A

When you feel as though your decision making ability is being threatened, you will react and buck the trend (why ~25% did not conform in Asch’s study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Greater conformity observed when:

A
  • Task is ambiguous
  • The majority is large (up to about 5)
  • The group is cohesive
  • The majority is unanimous (no “true partner”)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

True partner

A

Someone who violates the norm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Majority and Minority influence - 2-Process Model

A
  • Majority influence operates on public level - Works via pressure (Normative Social Influence)
  • Minority influence operates on private level
  • People think deeply about issues- (Informational Social Influence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Majority and Minority influence - 1 process model

A
  • Social Impact Theory
  • Influence = f(SIN)
  • Nonlinear model
20
Q

Social impact theory

A

Social influence is a function of strength, immediacy, and number of influential sources

21
Q

Cialdini’s (2001) Principles of Compliance

A 
LASCRASv
•	Reciprocation
•	Commitment/Consistency
•	Social Validation
•	Scarcity
•	Liking
•	Authority
22
Q

Reciprocation

A

People are willing to comply with requests from those who have provided something first

23
Q

Door-in-the-face Technique

A

Reciprocation -

- Start with large request (denied), which is then followed by a smaller request

24
Q

Perceptual Contrast

A

Reciprocation - why it works

- Because the first request was so large and the second so small, the second seems much smaller

25
Self-presentation explanation
Reciprocation - why it works | - You don’t want appear as though you will constantly reject someone
26
Commitment/consistency
People are willing to engage in a behavior if they see it as being consistent with an existing or previously made commitment
27
Foot-in-the-door Technique
Start with a small request and follow that with a larger request - People want to remain consistent with their response to their initial request
28
Why Foot in the door works
Self-perception theory perceptual contrast hypothesis Thoughts processes of recipients
29
Thoughts processes of recipients
Works better if people have a higher need for cognitive consistency
30
Lowball technique
After people agree to an initial request then there all these additional things that must be completed with the request
31
Social validation
- People are willing to engage in a behavior if they see evidence that others (particularly similar others) are engaging in the behavior E.g., Suicides (rates usually increase after a public suicide
32
Scarcity
- People find objects and opportunities attractive If they are scarce, rare, or dwindling in availability E.g., Advertisement (“Limited time offer”)
33
Liking/friendship
People prefer to say yes to people they know and like
34
Authority
People are willing to follow the directions or recommendations of someone they view as an authority
35
Destructive obedience
Obedience that results in behavior counter to accepted standards of moral behavior
36
Eichmann’s Fallacy
The belief that evil deeds are only done by evil people | - Milgram disproved this
37
4 roots of evil deeds
1. Instrumentality 2. Threatened Egotism 3. Idealism 4. Sadism
38
Instrumentality
→ Violence is used to achieve some end state
39
Threatened egoism
→ Violence is used to restore pride/honor
40
Idealism
→ Violence used to achieve good
41
Sadism
→ Violence is used because it is good
42
3 other roots
1. Difficult Life Conditions 2. Cultural and Personal Preconditions - Terror Management Theory 3. Social-Political Organization - Totalitarian/Authoritarian regimes that institute segregation
43
Stanley Milgram’s (1963) Study of Obedience
- Each time the learner gives an incorrect response, the teacher must give him a shock (increasing in 15 volt intervals – 15 to 450 volts) • Foot-In-The-Door Technique - Results --> No one exited the study before 300 volts, 65% of participants completed the study
44
Factors Affecting Obedience
1. Baseline (65%) 2. Proximity of Victim - - In same room (40%); - Touch victim (30%) 3. Location of Experiment - Run down office (48%) 4. Authority Figure - “Average Joe” experimenter (20%) - Proximity: Experimenter gives orders by phone (10%)
45
Why did so many people obey?
o Foot-in-the-Door Technique o Reciprocation (for money) o Experimenter claimed responsibility
46
Are Milgram’s Findings Generalizable?
- Conceptual replications Eg The Nurse Study (Hofling et al., 1966) - Cross-cultural replications - Stability of findings over time

Social psych (11 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions