Lecture 4: Peptide-derived ligands Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

Can we already target all proteins with medication? Why yes or not?

A

No. There is only a portion of proteins related to diseases (~27%) - number will likely grow in the future
- from that only 3% are already targetted, and 7% seem to pose potential

  • The “undruggable” ones usually lack a distinctive binding pocket (very often happens if there is protein to protein binding, but some interaction sites can be targetted) or they are located inside the cell

NOTE: when proteins bind to one another they often rely on specific organization of secondary structures -> even small alterations of those can disrupt the binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Look at the Kinetics and Thermodynamics:

A

Research focuses on stabilizing the small peptide structure in the folded state (even though unfolded seems to be favoured)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Recap of protein states

A

Proteins usually exist in native states but have also other possible favoured states - often times tend to be unfolded
-> the larger structure gets the more likely it is to end up folded

  • There are also global minima that cannot go back (usually aggregates)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the “easiest” way to stabilize small peptides?

A
  • Adding a molecule that can bind to sides of the peptide that need to be kept in place for the secondary structure to fold = microcyclization
  • E.g. at the ends of a loop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by Peptidomimetics?

A

= small peptide molecules that can mimic the natural peptides
A) Slightly modified - only focus on altering amino acids
- do NOT efficiently penetrate the cells, but have high affinity
B) More changes - more minor alterations e.g. side chains
= both still peptidic

C) Molecules with small molecular core and only few small residues in peptidic form
D) Molecules that mimics actions e.g. bind to similar regions
- easier to get them inside a cell, BUT lack specificity, affinity to target

=> try to find the golden route between affinity and efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What kind of turns can we have?

A

Each of the turns has different position of H (they are defined by a hydrogen constrain)
E.g. H is placed in between carbonyl group at position i and NH group at position i+2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How can we mimic turns/loops?

A
  1. Microcyclization
  2. Induce a turn that wouldn’t have occured naturally
  3. Give preference to H that will form the desired bond
  4. Look for a scaffold that will bring the turns into correct position
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Look at examples of structural mimetics:

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can beta-sheets look like?

A

Parallel X anti-parallel (more stable) -> this is what will be pursued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can we stabilize the beta-sheets?

A

1) Find the turn to connect antiparallel ends
2) Include amino acids that will force a bond (and doesn’t occur normally)
3) Microcyclization between side-chains or between termini
4) Structural can mimic a single strand

NOTE: rarily do we use just one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Look at an example of turn mimetics of beta-sheets:

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Look at an example of enforcing amino acids in beta-sheet.

A

Replace natural amino acid -> support beta-sheet arrangement along the sheet but also with the opposing beta-sheet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Look at the microcyclization in beta-sheets.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Look at the structural mimetics in beta-sheets.

A

Very difficult as beta-strands don’t usually exist alone -> they can onlt form in relation to alpha helix or another beta strand to form beta sheet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What determines the nomenclature of helices?

A

There are different types of helices - they differ based on the placement of H bonding

Nomenclature is determined by
- the number of residues participating in one turn e.g. 3
- the number of atoms within the turn e.g. 10
=> but more often we just use names e.g. alpha helix, pi-helix

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do the helix mimetics look?

A

1) Pick 2 residues of the helix that are close to another -> constrain them with another molecule
2) Foldamers - amino acids that promote helical fold
3) N-terminal cap
4) Structural mimetics

17
Q

Look at example of class A helix mimetics.

A

Can also be switchable

18
Q

Look at example of class B helix mimetics.

19
Q

Look at example of class C (structural) helix mimetics.

20
Q

What are pseudomonas aeruginosa?

A
  • normally occuring bacterium
  • BUT if our immunity is compromised (e.g. in the hospital) -> it can induce infections of burn wounds, pheumonia, eye infection
21
Q

How does the bacterium function?

A

Bacterium injects ExoD enzyme into the host cell -> needs to associate to a human adaptor protein (14-3-3) -> only then can it, via internal pathway, change metabolic activity of the cell which could induce apoptosis

22
Q

Look at a close-up of the interaction.

A

Research focused on mimicking the ExoS sequence
- wouldn’t look like this in solutions -> needs stabilization
-> testing of different combinations

23
Q

What did they use in the end?

A

Utilized hydrophobic cross link - i.e. introduced non-natural amino acids -> close these and get rid of the double bonds

24
Q

Look at the resulting molecule.

A

High affinity molecule
- orange = new, grey = original
- structure constraint

25
How do thermodynamics fall into this.
= how does the overal energy change - Observing the thermodynamics -> determine parameters e.g. delta G - look at the profile of the wild type => determines affinity and stability - Now, the new one - greater delta G -> increase in affinity - entropic contribution is negative (constrained) -> beneficial hydrophobic effect (more favourable)
26
How do kinetics fall into this.
= how do the Kon (association) and Koff (dissociation) change - Wild peptide X new peptide - increase in Kon -> goes quicker into the binding pocket (ligand was already preorganized, while the wild needs to still change into the correct one) - decrease in Koff -> once bound the ligand stays for longer