Lecture 4: Stress and anxiety Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

Arousal

A
  • A general physiological and psychological activation varying on a continuum from deep sleep to intense excitement - Gould, Greenleaf and Krane, 2002
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is arousal determined by?

A

physiological processes such as emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

theories of arousal

A

drive theory

inverted U theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

drive theory

A

○ Hull 1943
○ Proportional linear relationship
○ More psyched up - better the performance
○ Increased drive (arousal) will increase likelihood of dominant response/most usual behaviour
○ Performance will be worse for poorer learnt or complex skills
○ Limited empirical support in sport for it
○ Increasing drive (arousal) - performers resort to previously learnt skills because they are dominant - but may be incorrect (novices, intermediates)
○ Even highly skilled players ‘choke’ in highly charged situations e.g. a penalty shoot out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

inverted-U hypothesis

A

○ Yerkes and Dodson, 1908
○ Predicts performance effectiveness will increase as arousal increases
§ Up to some optimal point
§ Further increases in arousal will produce a decrease in performance
○ Suggests behaviour is aroused and directed toward balance or optimal state
○ General notion is accepted - experience under arousal, optimal arousal, over arousal
○ Recent evidence support predictions on simple tasks (Landers and Arent, 2010)
○ Criticism (Gould and Udry, 1994; Hardy, 1990)
§ Optimal arousal at midpoint?
§ Nature of arousal itself?
○ Taken as far as can - explore other views

“ a catastrophe for sport psychology” (Hardy & Fazey, 1987)
“If… the inverted-U hypothesis reveals only that the motivated outperform the apathetic and the terrified, it should be consigned to the true-but-trivial category” (Neiss, 1988)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

anxiety

A
  • A negative emotional state with feelings of nervousness, worry and apprehension associated with activation or arousal - Weinberg and Gould, 2011
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

trait anxiety

A
  • Trait anxiety: aspect of personality - an individual with trait anxiety will experience anxiety regardless of the situation (how do you usually feel?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

state anxiety

A
  • State anxiety: how you feel right now (multidimensional)
    ○ Cognitive anxiety
    ○ Somatic anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

types of state anxiety

A

cognitive and somatic anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

relationship between trait and state anxiety

A
  • Individuals with high trait anxiety usually have high levels of state anxiety in highly competitive, evaluative situations.
    ○ High trait anxious individuals can learn coping skills to reduce state anxiety
    ○ Knowing a person’s level of trait anxiety
    § Useful in predicting how they will react to competition, evaluation and threatening situations
    § Weinberg and Gould, 2011
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

cognitive anxiety

A
○ Concerned with extent to which one worries or has negative thoughts
			§ Lack a sense of self confidence
			§ Disrupted attentions
			§ Sense of worry, fear, doubt, etc
			§ Worrisome expectation of failure
			§ Negative concerns about performance
			§ Impaired ability to concentrate
		○ Psychological responses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

somatic anxiety

A
○ Concerned with the moment-to-moment changes in one's perception of physiological activation
			§ Unusual feelings of nausea
			§ Increased respiration rates
			§ Increased blood pressure
			§ Increased muscle tension
			§ Increased perspiration
		○ Physiological responses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

components of anxiety

A

○ Multidimensional
○ Cognitive (mental)
§ Worry and have negative thoughts
○ Somatic (physical)
§ Nervousness and tension, increased perspiration, pounding heart
○ Behavioural (little research)
§ Tense facial expression, changes in communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

stress

A
  • A substantial imbalance between demand (physical and/or psychological) and response capability, under conditions where failure to meet that demand has important consequences - McGrath, 1970
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

fight or flight response

A
○ Increased heart rate
		○ Inhibits peristalsis
		○ Shivering/goose bumps
		○ Pupils dilate
		○ Increase perspiration
		○ Glycogen to glucose
		○ (Nor)adrenaline
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the stress process (McGrath, 1970)

A

stage 1: environmental demand (physical and psychological)

stage 2: individual’s perception of the environmental demand (amount of psychological or physical ‘threat’ perceived)

stage 3: stress response (physical and psychological)

  • arousal
  • state anxiety (cognitive and somatic)
  • muscle tension
  • attention changes

stage 4: behavioural consequences (performance or outcome)

This occurs in a cycle

17
Q

what causes stress and anxiety?

A
situational sources
individual factors (Weiner and Gould, 2011)
18
Q

situational sources of stress and anxiety

A

○ Event importance: the more important the event, the more stressful it is likely to be; importance of the event to the individual
Expectations: too much pressure (from parents, coaches) can add to competitive anxiety; low expectations regarding performance can also invoke anxiety

19
Q

individual factors causing stress and anxiety

A

○ Trait anxiety: individuals high in trait anxiety are more likely to see competition as stressful (genetics, experience).
○ Performance concerns: perfectionism and over concern with image is associated with high anxiety.
○ Locus of control: the extent to which we believe that we are in control of our lives; low locus of control individuals are generally more susceptible to stress and anxiety.
○ Self-esteem: those with low self-esteem experience lower self-confidence and more state anxiety.
○ Social physique anxiety: the degree to which one becomes anxious when others observe their physiques.

20
Q

when can stress and anxiety be experienced in sport?

A

○ Days leading to competition
○ Immediately prior to competition
○ During competition
○ After competition

21
Q

relationship between cognitive and somatic anxiety and time to event (Martens et al., 1990)

A

○ CSAI-2 measured 48h, 24h, 2h and 5mins before
○ Cognitive anxiety stayed stable
○ Somatic anxiety increases prior to event onset

See physical flashcard

22
Q

individual differences in anxiety and performance

A

§ cognitive levels elevated but stable as competition approaches
§ Somatic anxiety levels low
□ Day prior to competition - somatic anxiety rises
§ On starting competition both cognitive and somatic anxiety decrease

23
Q

cognitive anxiety reduction strategies

A

○ Reducing the importance of the competition
○ Implementation of effective goal-setting programme
○ Pre-performance routines

24
Q

somatic anxiety reduction strategies

A

○ Breathing
○ Relaxation techniques
○ Parking

25
study on multidimensional state anxiety
○ Do anxious swimmer swim slower? (Burton, 1988) ○ Predicts different relationships between different components of anxiety and performance ○ Support for the 3 predictions in Burton's (1988) study of swimmers ○ Relationship strongest in short duration events ○ Relationships are generally weak ○ It doesn't account for interactive effects
26
study on anxiety in sport
- Meta-analysis of 48 studies investigating cognitive anxiety and self-confidence subscales - Effect sizes ○ Small: 0.2 ○ Medium: 0.5 ○ Large: 0.8 Quantitative measure of the magnitude of the experimental effect, the larger the effect size, the stronger the relationship between two variables. Effect sizes higher for men - suggests precompetitive cognitive anxiety and self confidence impact performance of men more than women. High-standard conditions produce more anxiety shown by larger effect sizes.
27
how does anxiety effect sport?
- Anxiety often impairs performance on 'difficult' tasks (Eysenck and Calvo, 1992) - But findings are complex and inconsistent… why? ○ Anxiety is complex ○ Pre-event assessment ○ Blunt performance measures ○ In-event coping ○ Task characteristics ○ Self-report measures “It is probably not very realistic for pre-performance measures of anxiety to predict actual performance to any great extent” (Jones et al., 1993)
28
theories linking to anxiety and arousal
- The drive theory - The inverted U hypothesis - The IZOF model - Catastrophe theory
29
individual zone of optimal functioning (IZOF)
- Optimal zone rather than optimal point | - Zone changes depending on sport depending on level of activation needed in that sport.
30
catastrophe theory
○ Focuses on the interactive effects of arousal, cognitive anxiety and performance Fazey and Hardy. 1991 - Implications for athletes ○ After a catastrophic decline in performance, the athlete must: A. Completely relax physically B. Cognitively restructure or eliminate worries and regain confidence and control, and C. Reactivate him/herself in a controlled manner to again reach an optimal level of functioning
31
directional anxiety
Directional anxiety (Jones, Swain and Hardy, 1993) - Limitation of measuring just anxiety intensity - Interpretation of symptoms important
32
cognitive methods of anxiety management
○ Imagery ○ Thought stopping ○ Positive self-talk ○ Rational thinking
33
somatic methods of anxiety management
○ Progressive muscular relaxation | ○ Biofeedback
34
when is catastrophe theory applicable?
under conditions of high cognitive anxiety