Lecture 7: Bias and Confounding in Epidemiological Studies Flashcards

1
Q

How do you get from association to causation?

A

If bias, confounding, and random error have been ruled out as alternate explanations, then we can get causal inference.

Bias in Knowledge Use
Reporting and Publication Bias
Bias in Analysis and Inference
Information Bias
Selection Bias
Confounding
Random Error
Causal Effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of errors in epidemiological inference

A

Random Error and Systematic Error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Random Error

A
  • When a sample measurement is different from the true population value due to chance
  • Random Error cannot be eliminated but we can reduce the severity through large sample size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Major Sources of Random Error

A

Individual Biological Variation
Sampling Error
Measurement Error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Individual Biological Variation

A
  • there is a variation in the entity being studied
  • caused by intra-individual and inter-individual differences
  • ex. blood pressure
  • address this error through using repeated measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sampling Error

A
  • sample size is too small and not representative of the population
  • characteristics of the sample are different due to chance.
  • addressed by having a large population size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Measurement Error

A
  • Occurs when there is inaccuracy in instrument or person operating the instrument
  • error is due to chance because no measurement is perfectly accurate

Addressed by:
- using strict study protocols
- making sure investigators understand method being used
- making sure labs undergo quality control procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What to consider for sample size calculations?

A
  1. Level of statistical significance
  2. Acceptable Error
  3. Magnitude of Effect Under Investigation
  4. Prevalence of disease in the population
  5. Relative sizes of groups being compared
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sample size in case-controls

A
  • if disease is rare, select all cases of disease and sample of controls
  • need to achieve a 4 to 1 ratio (that is when the maximum power is reached)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Systematic Error

A
  • Error that is not due to chance
  • involved with something that the research has done in regard to the design and implementation of the study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bias

A

Systematic error that results in an incorrect/invalid measure of the association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Two major sources of systematic error

A

Selection Bias
Information/Measurement Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Selection Bias

A
  • Systematic differences between people included and not included in the study
  • cohort studies: error in selection of exposed and unexposed
  • volunteer bias and differential loss to follow up are main sources for prospective
  • case-controls: error in selection of cases and controls
  • inclusion of controls that are representative of the population for case-control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Selection bias may be due to..

A

Procedures used to select participants (healthy worker effect)
Factors that Influence continued participation in the study (long follow-up period)

Specific characteristics may affect motivation to participate and ability to participate:
- motivation to participate (worried about exposure)
- ability to participate (low SES, poor health)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Avoiding Selection Bias

A

Selecting into the study:
- in procedures used to select
- sampling strategy should target person representative of broader population
- incentive to participate

Continuing in the study:
- Keep participants engaged in the research
- ask participants to provide secondary contact
- use tracing method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Measurement Bias

A
  • individuals in the study are systematically placed in the wrong exposure or outcome group
  • flaw in measuring exposure, outcome, covariant which results in different information between comparison groups
  • Results from systematically imperfect definitions of study variables or data collection methods
17
Q

Major sources of measurement bias

A
  • recall bias
  • observer bias
18
Q

Recall Bias

A
  • subjects in the study have difficulty recalling information
  • mainly in case-controls since you are interviewing the cases about their past controls
  • can occur in cohort studies if asked about past exposures
19
Q

Avoiding Recall Bias

A
  • use objective markers of exposure
  • verify responses
  • use diseased controls in case-control study (case are more likely to remember information)
20
Q

Proxy Respondents

A
  • are not the subject themselves but someone close to the subject that can respond on their behalf
  • are not going to have the most accurate information as they are not that person
21
Q

Observation bias

A
  • interview might insert their subjective opinions
  • occur in case-control studies as knowledge of disease status might influence questions about exposure
  • can occur in cohort and experimental if they inquire about exposed and unexposed
22
Q

Avoiding Observation Bias

A
  • mask interviewers
  • conduct quality assurance activities with interviewers
  • test reliability of interviewers’ data
23
Q

Misclassification

A
  • error in the classification
  • non-differential: degree of misclassification is same for study groups
  • differential: degree of misclassification is different for study groups
24
Q

Confounding

A
  • there is a third variable that could be an explanation for the association between the variables under study
  • variable is a risk factor for the outcome
  • variable is association with the exposure
25
Q

Effect of confounder

A

Association may be induced, strengthened, weakened, or eliminated. Impact depends on:
- strength of association between confounder and outcome
- strength of association between confounder and exposure
- prevalence of confounder

26
Q

Controlling confounders in the study design

A
  • randomization
  • restriction
  • matching
27
Q

Limitations of randomization

A

only used in experimental studies

28
Q

Limitations of restriction

A
  • difficult to find study subjects
  • reduces generalizability
29
Q

Limitations of matching

A
  • can’t match on more than a few confounders
  • difficult to find appropriate controls
  • once a variable is matched for, it can no longer be evaluated
30
Q

Controlling confounders in an analysis design

A
  • stratification
  • statistical modeling
31
Q

Limitations for stratification

A
  • can only control for categorical confounders
  • sample sizes may be too small
32
Q

Limitations of statistical modelling

A
  • difficult for non-researchers to interpret
  • requires a large sample size
  • certain assumptions need to be met