Lecture 7- Ototoxicity Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

How could you define ototoxic?

A

Any source of non-mechanical damage to the ear, including:

  • Several medications
  • Many solvents
  • Some heavy metals
  • Possibly select asphyxiants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are aminoglycoside antibiotics?

A
  • Among the most commonly used antibiotics worldwide
  • Sold OTC in some countries
  • Treatment for gram negative infections, including pseudomonas and mycobacterium tuberculosis
  • Side effects include ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some examples of aminoglycoside antibiotics?

A
  • Gentamicin
  • Neomycin
  • Kanamycin
  • Tobramycin
  • Amikacin
  • Streptomycin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How are aminoglycosides used today?

A
  • Tuberculosis
  • Gentamicin used to treat infections in neonates
  • Tobramycin used to treat respiratory infections in cystic fibrosis
  • Gentamicin used to treat endocarditis
  • Neomycin used prior to bowel surgery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How are aminoglycosides ototoxic?

A
  • Amikacin, tobramycin, and gentamicin about equally toxic
  • As many as 21% of children with CF have aminoglycoside ototoxicity
  • HL caused by death of sensory hair cells
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do aminoglycoside antibiotics cause HL?

A
  • Enter HC through mechano-electrical transduction channels
  • Once in HC, may not be readily cleared
  • High concentration –> off-target binding of ribosomes and inhibition of protein translation
  • Formation of reactive oxygen species in HC
  • Apoptopia death of HC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are audiologic manifestations of aminoglycoside ototoxicity?

A

Hearing Loss
 Bilateral, HFSN
 Onset of HL is often delayed days or weeks after onset of therapy
• Rapidity of hearing loss is dose-related
• Dependent on renal function
 Most often permanent
• Recovery may occur over a 1-6-month period
• Most likely if ototoxicity occurs early, hearing shift is <25 dB, and corrective measures are taken immediately
• Sx that present weeks after treatment are most likely permanent

Tinnitus
	Occurs before the onset of hearing loss 
	High pitched ringing
	Immediately following first treatment
	Weeks after d/c (discontinuation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are vestibular manifestations of aminoglycoside ototoxicity?

A
Acute Phase
	Headache may be the first Sx
	Nausea, vomiting, imbalance 1-2 weeks
	Vertigo in upright position
•	Sitting, standing
	Inability to perceive termination of movement
	Positive Romberg
Chronic Phase
	Sx of chronic labyrinthitis
•	Difficulty with sudden movements
•	Imbalance when walking
•	Lasts up to 2 months

Compensatory Phase
 Centrally mediated
 12-18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are antineoplastic drugs?

A

• Platinum Compounds
o Cisplatinum (CDDP)- cumulative cochleotoxicity
 Among the most widely used and effective of the anti-cancer drugs
 Most ototoxic drug in clinical use
o Carboplatin- less cochleotoxicity

  • Nitrogen mustard- cochleotoxic
  • Vincristine or vinblastine sulfate – rare reports of cochlear toxicity
  • Difluoromethylornithine- transient or permanent dose related cochlear toxicity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does cisplatin kill cancer cells?

A

o Cisplatin binds DNA and results in a kink in the DNA helix

o Damage to the DNA is recognized as irreversible damage to the cell and the cell proceeds to die

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is cisplatin ototoxicity?

A

o Typically, bilateral, symmetrical, sensory, permanent

o Appears first in the high frequencies
 Can progress to low frequencies with continued treatment, higher cumulative dose

o HL time course
 Gradual onset, progressive and cumulative, or sudden
 Evidence of progression years after cisplatin is d/c

o Prevalence
 HL in 7-71% in adults
 HL ~60-70% in children
 Tinnitus, with or without HL, ~60%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is carboplatinum toxicity?

A

o Less cochleotoxic than Cisplatinum

o Indications are similar to Cisplatinum
 Ovarian cancer data shows response rates similar to Cisplatinum

o Histopathology
 Destruction of IHC demonstrated in animal models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are loop diuretics?

A
  • Ethacrynic acid, furosemide (Lasix) butametanide
  • Drugs that inactivate the sodium-potassium pump at the loop of Henle in the kidney
  • Prevent reabsorption of sodium, potassium, chloride, and water – potent diuretics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the indications for loop diuretics?

A
o	Heart failure
o	Edema
o	Hypertension
o	Ascites (fluid accumulation in the gut) from liver failure
o	Bronchopulmonary dysplasia in neonates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is loop diuretic ototoxicity?

A

Tinnitus

Hearing loss
 Permanent with ethacrynic acid
 Usually reversible with furosemide
 Flat, SNHL, and reversible hearing loss with use of Lasix

Rare reports of vertigo

Toxicity related to
 Dosing: slow-low is best
 Concomitant aminoglycoside Rx
 Renal function/failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are chelating agents?

A

Deferoxamine (desferal) and desferasirox (exjade, jadenu)
o Chelating agent used to treat iron overload
o Beta thalassemia
o Diamond Blackman anemia
o Sickle cell disease

Deferoxamine alone or in combination: HL in 32%

Desferasirox alone: not ototoxic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the indications of ototopic agents?

A

o Suppurative otitis media
o Otorrhea following myringotomy and tube placement
o Draining mastoid cavities
o Otitis externa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why do audiologists monitor for ototoxicity?

A

• Ensure early identification of hearing loss
• Prevent functional hearing loss
o Treatment alternatives
o Smaller or less frequent doses
o Interruption of suspension of treatment
• Care and support of patient and family
o Assist in re/habilitation, as indicated
o Ensure informed decision making
• Evaluate drug safety
o Known efficacious drugs
o Research using new or experimental treatments
o Criteria for clinical trials

19
Q

What are considerations for ototoxicity monitoring?

A
  • Patient age and medical status – will this change over time?
  • Underlying diagnosis – can this affect hearing?
  • Purpose of monitoring – are there alternatives?
  • How will a change in hearing be defined and reported?
20
Q

Why are ototoxicity grading scales beneficial?

A

o Consistency
o Objective
o Approachable numbers to the non-audiologist
o Defined parameters; operational definition
o Rank or grade the degree of hearing loss
o Provide government agencies with data to judge drug safety
o Assess effectiveness of otoprotective interventions
o Assess genetic susceptibility to ototoxicity

21
Q

What are the ASHA Ototoxicity criteria (Binary yes/no)?

A

> 20 dB decrease in pure-tone threshold at one test frequency OR

> 10 dB decrease at two adjacent test frequencies OR

Loss of response at 3 consecutive test frequencies where responses were previously attained

Threshold change confirmed on retest

22
Q

What are the advantages/disadvantages of the ASHA ototoxicity?

A

Advantage
- Provides early detection of ototoxicity

Disadvantage:

  • Does not assign a grade; binary yes/no
  • Patient serves as their own control
23
Q

What are the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)?

A

o Grading of adverse events, hearing change, and/or therapeutic needs
o Hearing only graded up to Grade 4
o Graded on a scale of 0-5
 No adverse event

Grade 1: Mild Adverse Event

Grade 2: Moderate Adverse

Grade 3: Severe Adverse Event

Grade 4: Life Threatening Adverse Event

Grade 5: Fatal Adverse Event

24
Q

What is the Monitoring for FDA Approval of drugs?

A

Phase 1: safety

Phase 2: efficacy – optimum dose-response

Phase 3: large scale study to detect side effects not identified in first 2 phases

Phase 4: further evaluation on subpopulations such as children, pregnant women and the elderly

25
What is the Brock Criteria (grading of hearing loss at the end of the trial)?
o Grade 0: Hearing thresholds less than 40 dB HL at all frequencies o Grade 1: Thresholds 40 dB HL or greater at 8000 Hz o Grade 2: Thresholds of 40 dB HL or greater at 4000-8000 Hz o Grade 3: Thresholds of 40 dB HL or greater at 2000-8000 Hz o Grade 4: Thresholds of 40 dB or greater at 1000-8000 Hz
26
What is the Boston SIOP grading of hearing loss?
Based on sensorineural hearing thresholds in dB HL (bone conduction or air conduction with a normal tympanogram) Grade 0: <20 dB HL at all frequencies Grade 1: >20 dB HL SNHL above 4000 Hz Grade 2: >20 dB HL SNHL at 4000 Hz and above Grade 3: >20 dB HL SNHL at 2000 or 3000 Hz and above Grade 4: >40 dB HL SNHL at 2000 Hz and above
27
Why are neonates administered aminoglycosides?
o Broad spectrum specificity toward organisms commonly encountered in neonatal sepsis o Considered clinically essential despite known ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity
28
Why is rate of HL in NICU higher?
o Etiology largely unknown | o Aminoglycoside use is one common risk factor
29
What are factors potentiating aminoglycoside ototoxicity?
Concurrent medications  Glycopeptide antibiotic – vancomycin  Neuromuscular blocking agents- pancuronium bromine and vecuronium bromide  Loop diuretics- Lasix Inflammatory status  Host-induced inflammatory response to infection or bacterial immunogens  Systemic inflammation 2o abdominal irradiation Genetics  Mitochondrial DNA variant, A1555G  ACMG recommends screening for this variant Noise levels in NICU  Sustained noise may potentiate ototoxicity of aminoglycosides
30
What are approaches to monitoring neonates for ototoxicity?
JCIH recommendations regarding ototoxicity  If aminoglycosides >5 days, diagnostic audiologic follow up by 9 months of age unless there has been a toxic-level (not defined) or there is a known genetic susceptibility to aminoglycosides How do we typically test for ototoxicity?  Behavioral pure-tone thresholds in children  Baseline test followed by monitoring tests What are we looking for?  Changes in the high frequencies  Early detection No specific screening and monitoring protocol for ototoxicity in neonates
31
What are some challenges in monitoring neonates for ototoxicity?
Timing and feasibility of test  Ototoxicity monitoring protocols recommend baseline test  80% of NICU admissions receive prophylactic or empiric treatment with aminoglycosides Focus of test  NBHS protocols looking for mild to moderate loss in mid frequencies • Do not test above 4kHz (Oae) • Broadband click (aABR)  Ototoxicity monitoring requires higher frequencies • DPOAE at 10 kHz or above not available on clinical equipment Serial ABR or OAE  Labor intensive  Difficult to interpret in premature infants (<34 weeks) Noise from medically necessary interventions  Mechanical ventilation  Acoustic and electrical artifact
32
What are clinical issues specific to monitoring ototoxicity in neonates?
Some neonates spend several months in the NICU  Screening if often delayed until just prior to d/c  If HL is identified, may not have intervention by 6 months of age  May increase risk for neurodevelopmental delays Increased noise floors interfering with testing --> false positive screening and/or need for rescreening --> unduly stress parents
33
What are recommendations for ototoxicity prevention in neonates?
o Minimize use of aminoglycosides o Monitor level of ambient noise in NICU and take steps to mitigate o Prenatal testing for genetic risk factors o Education of parents and NICU staff regarding the risk of progressive or late onset HL and importance of follow-up
34
What are some childhood cancers treated with platinum chemotherapy?
``` o Osteosarcoma o Germ cell tumors o Hepatoblastoma o Medulloblastoma o Neuroblastoma o Pontine glioma ```
35
What are cisplatin ototoxicity risk factors?
Younger age Effect of dose Cranial radiation Use of other ototoxins during treatment Genetic predisposition
36
What are the impacts of cisplatin ototoxicity in children?
o Reduces utility of cisplatin therapy by limiting dose escalation o Precludes investigation of novel strategies to enhance cisplatin cytotoxicity o Infants and young children at critical stage of development  Speech language development  Literacy o Older children and adolescents  Educational achievement  Social-emotional development  Quality of life
37
What are the impacts of minimal SNHL in children?
Educational performance  Lower performance as compared to normal hearing peers (grade 3) (CTBS/4) • Reading vocabulary, language mechanics, word analysis, science, spelling  Teacher perception (SIFTER) • 66% difficulty with academics • 48% reduced attention • 79% problems with communication  Retention rates • Overall 37% as compared to 3% in normal hearing peers
38
What are the most common cancers in adults?
o Men: lung, prostate, colorectal | o Women: breast, colorectal, lung
39
What are some cancers treated with platinum-based chemotherapy?
``` o Head and neck o Lung o Colorectal o Bladder o Germ cell o Ovarian o Testicular ```
40
What are the goals of OMP?
o Use of standard definition of threshold shift | o Pre-treatment counseling regarding potential ototoxicity
41
What are the advantages and limitations of obtaining extended high frequencies thresholds?
Advantages: o Monitoring above 8000 Hz more sensitive to ototoxic changes than monitoring standard test frequency range o Intrasubject variability is within standard test-retest criteria Limitations: o Requires “add-on” of extended high frequencies to audiometer o EHF plus standard frequencies make for a long test session
42
What are the service delivery gaps for OMP?
Inconsistent referrals • Self-referral and physician referral after treatment • Multiple staff shifts and rotating residents made in-service training difficult • Insufficient lead time prior to treatment • Solutions: o Participation in oncology multidisciplinary team clinics o Referrals from pharmacy Scheduling limitations Location and space limitations Staffing limitations Logistical Barriers • Patient schedules and compliance with audiology visits • Audiology not near the oncology or infectious disease locations • Other appointments running late • Number of schedules, booths, and audiologists • Solutions: o Dedicated appointment slots/rooms/staff o Creative scheduling
43
What are the advantages and limitations of ABR monitoring for ototoxicity?
``` Advantages:  Reliable, portable, objective  Greater dB range than OAE  May capture pre-clinical changes  Helpful in cases when patient is very ill and/or uncooperative ``` Limitations  Lengthy  Lacks frequency specificity at high stimulus levels  High frequency stimuli may not be available  May require sedation
44
What are the advantages and limitations of OAE monitoring for ototoxicity?
Advantages:  Efficient, portable, and reliable objective tool  May capture pre-clinical changes  Helpful in cases when patient is very ill and/or uncooperative ``` Limitations  Limited ability to assess the higher frequencies  No widely accepted standard for change  Limited dB range  Obscured by ME disease  Require careful measurement ```