Lecture 7: Teams (Intra-Group Processes) Flashcards

1
Q

WHat does intra-group behaviour span?

A

Many subjects!

Ex:

Communication network, intragroup conflict, groupthink, group norms,

group cohesion, escalation of commitment, conformity, hidden profile,

leadership, minority influence, obediance, voice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain how teams require a multilevel perspective (2)

A
  1. Teams are a level of analysis, but also an empirical phenomenon
  2. They’re ultra social Multi-level: Indiv, Group, Organis, National, Global (cultures)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a group?

A

2 or more indiv who are connected by and within social relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give the 4 types of groups

A
  1. Primary groups
  2. Social groups
  3. Collectives
  4. Categories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Primary groups

A

Small long-term groups characterized by a high frequency of interaction, cohesiveness and member identification

Ex: families, close friends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social groups

A

Small groups of moderate duration and permeability characterized my moderate levels of interaction over an extended perioed of time, often goal-focused

Ex: coworkers, crews, teams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Collectives

A

Aggregations of indiv tha form spontaneously, last only a brief period of time and have very permeable boudaries

Ex: Audiences, bystanders, crowds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Categories

A

Aggregations of indiv who are similar to one another in some way

Ex: Asian, New Yorkers, women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a team?

A

A group collaborating towards achieving (organisational) goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are 5 characterics of groups

A

Interaction

Goals

Interdependence

Structure

Cohesion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain group interaction

A

Groups create, organize and sustain relationship + task interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain goals in groups

A

Have instrumental purposes to facilitate achievement aims + outcomes sought by members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain interdependence for groups (2)

A

Depend on one another
Influences and is influenced by each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain structure for groups

A

Organized: Each individual connected in pattern relationships, roles and norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain cohesion for groups

A

Unite in bonded network of interpersonal relations recognised by members inside and people out of group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Team VS Group (4)

A
  1. Goal: Collective performance VS share information
  2. Synergy: Positive VS Neutral (sometimes negative)
  3. Accountability: Individual and mutual VS individual
  4. Skills: Complementary VS random / varied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Teams: cost / benefit scenario (1:2:2)

A

Presence of others => evaluation of indiv effort (1) OR no eval indiv effort (2)

  1. Eval apprehension (arousal) => social facilitation
  2. No evaluation apprehension (less / no arousal) => social loafing

Yet:

  1. arouse tends promote dominant response
  2. arousal can interfere with highly complex task
18
Q

Tuckman: groups develop in stages (6)

A

Prestage 1

Stage 1: Forming → tentative comm + exchange background info

Stage 2: Storming → dissatisfaction, disagreement, leader and procedures challenges, cliques form

Stage 3: Norming → cohesiveness, agreement on procedures, standards + roles, improved communication

Stage 4: Performing → focus on work of group, task completion, decision making, cooperation

Stage 5: Adjourning → departures, withdrawal, decreased dependence, regret

19
Q

Temporary groups develop through..? (1)

A

Inertia and activity

20
Q

Why does Tuckman’s model have only partial applicability (2)

A
  1. rate progression across stages varies across groups
  2. transition across stages isn’t always clear
21
Q

Punctuated-equilibrium model (2:1)

A
  1. Applies to temporary groups with deadlines
  2. Describes phases of transition between inertia and activity

Direction set → Inertia → Accelerated activity → Inertia → Accelerated activity

22
Q

Social identity theory (1:2)

A

Groups develop as we form social identity

  1. When acting in groups, define ourselves in terms of group membership → Part of self-concept
  2. social identity is the individual’s portion of the self-concept derived from perceived membership of group
23
Q

Social identity processes are rooted in (2)

A
  1. Social categorization
  2. In-group favouritism
24
Q

Social norms (1:4)

A

Acceptable standards of behaviour within group + shared by members (Initially revealed by Hawthorne studies)

Ex:

  • Perform
  • Appear
  • Engage with others
  • Allocate resources
25
Q

Conformity

A

Tendency of individuals to adjust to group norms

26
Q

Asch’s experiment

A

Teams provide norms (experiment of saying right answer and then purposefully wrong to change answers of participant)

27
Q

What are 2 types of norms?

A
  1. Descriptive: perception what most people do as norm. (ex: trash cans)
  2. Injunctive: perception of what most people approve or disapprove → norms of “ought”
28
Q

Descriptive norms have what compared to injunctive norms

A

Stronger effect

Injunctive norm violations: people demonstrate they think ignoring the rule is fine.

29
Q

Role

A

Set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit

30
Q

Role ambiguity

A

situation where lack clarity about expected behaviour

31
Q

Role conflict

A

Situation where indiv. faces divergent role expectations

32
Q

Explain how very strong roles lead to deindividualisation

A

Roles provide very strong influence** on how people are expected to → behave according to the **role** → instead of according **individual characteristics

33
Q

GIve an example of deindividualisation

A

Zimbardo’s Prison experiment

My guess: cults?

34
Q

Milgram’s obedience experiments (1963)

A

Normal people can make horrible actions simply because given order, experiment

35
Q

What should be done to decrease the possibility of deviant workplace activities

A

Ensure group norms do not support antisocial behaviour

36
Q

Why pay attention to the status and power aspect of groups

A

People find it difficult to speak-up to power → increase psychological safety

37
Q

Hofling’s (1966) study of obedience in US healthcare (3:3)

A
  1. Nurses were phoned by “Dr Smith”: asking to give 20 mg dose of “Astroten”
  2. Broke several safety rules
    1. unlisted drugs
    2. instructions over phone
    3. safe medication dosages
      1. 21 / 22 nurses were prepared to give it
38
Q

Psychological safety

A

shared belief that is safe to engage in interpersonal risk taking

  • ensures organisational learning through creating environment where people can raise concers + ideas
  • varies at organisation, team and dyadic level
39
Q

dyadic

A

Explaisn relationship / relation between 2 things / entities

40
Q

Inclusive leadership

A

Inclusive leadership → psychological safety → engagement in quality improvement work